It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Willtell
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Blaine91555
Do we really have free expression, can we honestly call it free expression if it's okay to punish people for what they say?
If it’s the government doing it then we got a problem
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Blaine91555
Do we really have free expression, can we honestly call it free expression if it's okay to punish people for what they say?
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: MotherMayEye
Don't call me a cretin, again.
(I've done nothing to you and said nothing to warrant that!)
Sorry about that MotherMayEye, I had you confused with someone in another thread.
Too many irons in the fire tonight. Beyond the cretin remark I stand by my other remarks.
Bill of rights isn't considered law anymore anyway, except to save face in official statements.
That why police can search and seize your property without due process.
Thats why cops gun down an unarmed person and get away with it.
Thats why this gubment violates other nations rights like sovereignty and self determination with impunity.
Because of 'law and order' crowd that insist they know the law better than them.
Who bothers wth old bill of rights?
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: Willtell
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Blaine91555
Do we really have free expression, can we honestly call it free expression if it's okay to punish people for what they say?
If it’s the government doing it then we got a problem
If it's society doing it, we still have the same problem.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: MotherMayEye
The fear of punishment could be considered an inhibitor or an infringement of free expression.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: MotherMayEye
I'm not saying that it was illegal (what was done to the woman) all I'm saying is that it was not right.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: intrptr
I already did: Link
You are talking about corruption, injustice, and haven't figured in states' rights/laws.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: intrptr
I am not trying to dodge anything.
I am trying to sincerely discuss this.
You raised good points about corruption, injustice and you really haven't recognized states' rights. There are a couple of states that actually protect employee political speech.
Geez. I don't know why I am even bothering.
Politics and religion are not part of the workplace. Neither is soliciting or gambling. Girl Scout cookies and fund raisers for schools are by sign-up sheets in the break room.
Nothing in the U.S. Constitution prohibits the state of Virginia from passing a law prohibiting an employer from directing their employees' political activities by creating policies to that end and enforcing them.
originally posted by: intrptr
A company cannot enforce 'policies' (love that euphemism) that violate the constitution or bill of rights.
Why don't you just present your scenario instead of beating around the bush?