posted on Nov, 7 2017 @ 09:11 PM
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
I literally can imagaine no scenerio where the government “comes for the guns..”
No elected democrat has ever said they wanted to do it..
No law enforcement body nor the military would be willing to enforce it...
So what is the most realistic scenerio where a nation wide ban and confiscation is passed in the 3 branches, and then implemented???
How would it be implemented??
Who would do it??
How would the neutralize the citizenry, law enforcement and military so they could do it??
It wasn't on the docket for any country that did do it.
My guess is it would happen very different here in the US though...
Start with a voluntary buyback, move to mandatory then move to forced because there would be holdouts. First try at taking them would be widely
publicized and skewed toward government fighting radicals and extremists to pit the anti versus pro even more. This would lead to similar tactics as
in Nazi Germany where anti was encouraged to tell on those that they think have guns and are holding out.
Divide and conquer really. It is the way anything is forcefully done. If you think a law being passed is going to make people give up guns when
they've done nothing wrong then passing a law stating they have to immediately puts them on the wrong side of the law, therefore making them
This is the scenario, but the scenario would never happen. There are way more private gun owners than military and if anyone got wind of a massive
grab, constitutionally they could defend themselves and I guarantee plenty would.
It would be a huge fail for the government.
If you read and truly think about what I'm saying, you'll realize the reason people want them, and why it was in the constitution....
Cold dead hands here...no other way.