It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

12 sealed indictments now.....

page: 40
133
<< 37  38  39    41  42  43 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 06:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: purplemer

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: Sillyolme
So what happened with these sealed indictments?
Are they still sealed or were they unsealed and had nothing to do with Muellers investigation?

Why is this being allowed to fade away? What happened to all the righteous conviction?


Where is Tony Podesta?
Where is John Podesta?


I have been locking an unable to locate them for a while now. Have you got any info.



Did you try looking them up in the yellow pages and going to their office? No? Then why the insinuation that they have somehow "disappeared?" If they were arrested in connection with #pizzagate it would lead on Fox News. If there were warrants out against them they could not flee the country. Most likely they are skiing in Aspen or wintering in Bermuda. What's it to you?




posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 07:40 AM
link   
I bet that new EO will start multiplying the indictments.

I just watched this and was blown away at the potential.




In a quiet Executive Order signed a week ago, Trump targeted specific individuals with connections to the Clintons & Clinton Foundation for confiscation of assets of those engaged in corruption and human rights violations. It looks like a RICO style confiscation of the assets of organized crime as a precursor to coming after the people running the racket.


This guy David Knight seems pretty good. He goes through the list of the 13 names.

30 mins. worth a watch.






posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 08:36 AM
link   
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Provided by whom? the research team of Azarel50, Avonsalze??? Buildthewall?

Vasacroe, who are those people??? Sounds more than a bit impromptu to me.

Where are the original twelve you wrote about? You don't really seem to be able to provide too much information but you're loaded with innuendo.
What were those case numbers and what is their status right now? A
How many actually have to do with the Mueller investigation into donald trump and his campaign?



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 08:42 AM
link   
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Because you're sure not going to right? When you can't back up claims you make in a thread it's time for that thread to go in hoax or lol or skunk works. Or just post lies and qualify it with the phrase "If true". That seems to override the terms and conditions just fine these days.



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 08:48 AM
link   
a reply to: pheonix358

Thank you. Clinton was a Yale graduate and a senator and Secretary of state and a presidential candidate twice so there sure wouldn't be any shame in that resume so again thank you.

edit on 122018 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 01:21 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

No its the common sense line.

I look forward to your response when Clinton and company are indicted.
edit on 2-1-2018 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 01:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: pheonix358

Thank you. Clinton was a Yale graduate and a senator and Secretary of state and a presidential candidate twice so there sure wouldn't be any shame in that resume so again thank you.


Good to know how low our standards were...she did all of these things yet still doesn't know what a classified document looks like and has no idea what wiping a server means...

Glad she didn't win...she may have just sent all top secret docs to our enemies...dodged a bullet here.

7 more years....7 more years...7 more years.



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 01:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: pheonix358

Thank you. Clinton was a Yale graduate and a senator and Secretary of state and a presidential candidate twice so there sure wouldn't be any shame in that resume.


She lost 3 times. Maybe 4?



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 01:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Because you're sure not going to right? When you can't back up claims you make in a thread it's time for that thread to go in hoax or lol or skunk works. Or just post lies and qualify it with the phrase "If true". That seems to override the terms and conditions just fine these days.


Like I've said. I did sign up. You're welcome to do so as well. Not going to do your research for you.

Feel free to shoot any of it down with something other than your personal opinion. I provided the indictments as well as the original study from 2009 stating the numbers of sealed indictments for a year.

Now all you have to do is search ATS. Not that I expect you to, but pretty sure my threads and posts are far more qualified and researched than the one liner ignorance seen here.

7 more years...7 more years...7 more years.



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 03:57 PM
link   
For everyone doubting the large number of sealed indictments, here is a new article on the very subject:


Since late October, more than 9,000 sealed indictments have been filed in districts across the United States. Sealed indictments are typically used in prosecuting individuals or criminal networks in cases where revealing names could lead individuals to flee or destroy evidence.

As of Dec. 22, 2017, there were 9,294 sealed indictments, according to data collected by researchers and gathered from the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) service of the federal judiciary. This includes 1,224 in the central district of California, which includes Los Angeles; 194 in Washington; and 248 in the southern district of New York.

The number of indictments filed in less than three months is in stark contrast to previous years. According to a 2009 report from the Federal Judicial Center, in all of 2006, there were only 1,077 sealed indictments, and these were about 0.96 percent of all criminal cases that year.


The two links in the above referenced article are the very same items that have been linked in this thread and questioned as being valid.

The Epoch Times article goes on:


Ruskin said that among the causes mentioned for the surge of sealed indictments, the most plausible, he believes, is that it is related to human trafficking.

...

This would also fall in line with recent actions of President Donald Trump, who on Dec. 21, 2017, signed an executive order declaring a national emergency over human rights abuses and corruption. Trump declared January 2018 as National Slavery and Human Trafficking Prevention Month.


Both of the above linked items have also been discussed on these boards within the context of the sealed indictments. So either Epoch Times has reporters lurking here or we are hitting the nails right on their heads; perhaps a bit of both.



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 04:12 PM
link   
Ruskin is current before the bar and was an ADA before his 27 year career as a Special Agent.



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 04:50 PM
link   
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Pretty sure we get gleaned for info here by different sources. Looking forward to the sealed indictments being unsealed over time.

Funny that some think its about Russian collusion. 10k indictments....even if half of that, pretty sure Trump doesn't have 5K people he was colluding with...LOL!

The number alone suggests a MUCH larger target than Trump or his associates could ever amount to.



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 04:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Vasa Croe

The thing is that the number really reflects sealed-filings, not indictments. There could be three or four or more filings associated with one indictment.

It's still an unusually large number of filings/indictments.



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 06:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: pheonix358

Thank you. Clinton was a Yale graduate and a senator and Secretary of state and a presidential candidate twice so there sure wouldn't be any shame in that resume so again thank you.


And didn't work a day in her life for any of it. It was all handed to her on a silver platter. Just like Obama.



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 06:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Pretty sure we get gleaned for info here by different sources. Looking forward to the sealed indictments being unsealed over time.

Funny that some think its about Russian collusion. 10k indictments....even if half of that, pretty sure Trump doesn't have 5K people he was colluding with...LOL!

The number alone suggests a MUCH larger target than Trump or his associates could ever amount to.


It suggests many agencies and multiple cases. That's far too many for a single case, and they would group people together rather than appear at court for the same charges a hundred times.

I suspect that most of them will be unrelated and very few will be from Mueller at this point.


edit on 2-1-2018 by Byrd because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 06:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: Byrd

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Pretty sure we get gleaned for info here by different sources. Looking forward to the sealed indictments being unsealed over time.

Funny that some think its about Russian collusion. 10k indictments....even if half of that, pretty sure Trump doesn't have 5K people he was colluding with...LOL!

The number alone suggests a MUCH larger target than Trump or his associates could ever amount to.


It suggests many agencies and multiple cases. That's far too many for a single case, and they would group people together rather than appear at court for the same charges a hundred times.

I suspect that most of them will be unrelated and very few will be from Mueller at this point.



I disagree...these are federal court cases...not state. That's a LOT of Federal cases popping up in many districts at the same time...all within a 2 month period.



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 07:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Byrd

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Pretty sure we get gleaned for info here by different sources. Looking forward to the sealed indictments being unsealed over time.

Funny that some think its about Russian collusion. 10k indictments....even if half of that, pretty sure Trump doesn't have 5K people he was colluding with...LOL!

The number alone suggests a MUCH larger target than Trump or his associates could ever amount to.


It suggests many agencies and multiple cases. That's far too many for a single case, and they would group people together rather than appear at court for the same charges a hundred times.

I suspect that most of them will be unrelated and very few will be from Mueller at this point.



Doubt they all stem directly from the Mueller investigation, but they could be rolling up something big. Again, all the filings don't have to be indictments. You can get all sorts of things sealed. Even search warrants. Ex Mr. X is indicted for ABC. In connection to the investigation, Mr.X makes statements matching other evidence that Messrs. Y and Z may also be involved in the crime or series of crimes. The dockett may show MrX's search warrant, indictment, and arrest warrant followed by search warrants for Messrs.Y and Z (and maybe others). Any or all of those could be sealed. And the tree can branch out gradually or suddenly to even more.
You can also indict someone for one thing, and then indict them for another later as more facts pop up, so Mr. X shows up more than once.
If there sealed warrants in the group, you'll know within six months max because they generally unseal the minute when the defense asks the state (or feds, in this case) to demonstrate probable cause.



posted on Jan, 4 2018 @ 05:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: RadioRobert
a reply to: Vasa Croe

The thing is that the number really reflects sealed-filings, not indictments. There could be three or four or more filings associated with one indictment.

It's still an unusually large number of filings/indictments.


Sealed filings can also be search warrants.



posted on Jan, 4 2018 @ 06:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: RadioRobert
a reply to: Vasa Croe

The thing is that the number really reflects sealed-filings, not indictments. There could be three or four or more filings associated with one indictment.

It's still an unusually large number of filings/indictments.


Sealed filings can also be search warrants.


Donald Trump has over a hundred shell corporations registered in the state of Delaware. Obtaining their books and other records could account for a large number of warrants.



posted on Jan, 4 2018 @ 06:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: RadioRobert
a reply to: Vasa Croe

The thing is that the number really reflects sealed-filings, not indictments. There could be three or four or more filings associated with one indictment.

It's still an unusually large number of filings/indictments.


Sealed filings can also be search warrants.


Donald Trump has over a hundred shell corporations registered in the state of Delaware. Obtaining their books and other records could account for a large number of warrants.




Breaking: FBI and DOJ Announce They Will FINALLY Deliver Subpoenaed Docs on Phony Dossier to Congress


House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-CA) is tired of waiting for Deep State to turn over subpoenaed documents.

Nunes and GOP lawmakers on the Intel Committee gave the Department of Justice and FBI until Wednesday to turn over requested documents on the phony Trump dossier.


click link for article / video.

You also need to read this thread -
www.abovetopsecret.com...

IF the dossier was what was used to obtain the FISA warrants then this whole thing is done/
edit on 4-1-2018 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)







 
133
<< 37  38  39    41  42  43 >>

log in

join