It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: mzinga
a reply to: Xcathdra
It sure as hell has more credence than the dribble you morons are posting about q, a storm and indictments.
originally posted by: mzinga
a reply to: Vasa Croe
Please tell me one shred of proof front, indictments or this loon of a storm coming?
FBI and Justice Department officials have told congressional investigators in recent days that they have not been able to verify or corroborate the substantive allegations of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign outlined in the Trump dossier.
The FBI received the first installment of the dossier in July 2016. It received later installments as they were written at the height of the presidential campaign, which means the bureau has had more than a year to investigate the allegations in the document. The dossier was financed by the Hillary Clinton campaign and compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele.
An August 24, 2017 subpoena from the House Intelligence Committee to the FBI and Justice Department asked for information on the bureau's efforts to validate the dossier. Specifically, the subpoena demanded "any documents, if they exist, that memorialize DOJ and/or FBI efforts to corroborate, validate, or evaluate information provided by Mr. Steele and/or sub-sources and/or contained in the 'Trump Dossier.'"
According to sources familiar with the matter, neither the FBI nor the Justice Department has provided documents in response to that part of the committee's subpoena. But in face-to-face briefings with congressional staff, according to those sources, FBI and DOJ officials have said they cannot verify the dossier's charges of a conspiracy between the Russian government and the Trump campaign.
H. A. Goodman @HAGOODMANAUTHOR
47m47 minutes ago
MUELLER CONFIRMS TRUMP NOT UNDER INVESTIGATION: Sends Request To DOJ But... youtu.be... via @YouTube
originally posted by: liveandlearn
a reply to: Vasa Croe
Tony Podesta
Huma Abedin
Hillary
Pelosi
McCain
as all were mentioned by Q
And probably others found on Awan's computer or elsewhere.
Think about it NSA has all this info
Q asked " how many agencies had directors replaced...all but one.
Answer was only NSA was not replaced run by Mike Rogers.
Mike Rogers met with Trump after his election and didn't let Obama or anyone know.
Other ex NSA folks began calling for Rogers replacement
originally posted by: Truthturtlehead
originally posted by: liveandlearn
a reply to: Vasa Croe
Tony Podesta
Huma Abedin
Hillary
Pelosi
McCain
as all were mentioned by Q
And probably others found on Awan's computer or elsewhere.
Think about it NSA has all this info
Q asked " how many agencies had directors replaced...all but one.
Answer was only NSA was not replaced run by Mike Rogers.
Mike Rogers met with Trump after his election and didn't let Obama or anyone know.
Other ex NSA folks began calling for Rogers replacement
Because all those people were secretly working to help the Russians get Trump elected lmao