12 sealed indictments now.....

a reply to: Sillyolme

And the same methods had Hillary Clinton a 99% winner.

It's all in the "Page 5" chronicles.

And of course, the chances of Steele being a liar and a crackpot maniac are at 100%.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
Where oh where are all those arrests?

MS-13 got nailed hard today.

a reply to: shooterbrody

The percentage was stated by Steele dude . It's not part of their scale the scale is confidence levels for intelligence. Which you apparently think don't exist. Stop pretending to be stupid.

What's the worry anyway? If it's all made up ?

a reply to: Sillyolme

Here is the actual report your article is based upon, please find me the ranges you're insisting upon in that report.

a reply to: Sillyolme

You posted statistics that you have no source for.
You gave three links that in no way said what you posted.
As usual you come here to post whatever falsehoods morning joe tells you.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Ok. Using your metric, Steel is 100% confident that 10-30% of the dossier is not credible and inaccurate.

100% is bigly confident in the world of espionage(1).

***
Sources:
1. See page 5.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

"No you just don't understand the glamorous life of a retired espionage agent and the scales of veracity that are employed by such clandestine analysis players. He told us what level of verification we could expect to see on his highly accurate and unsourcable "STEELE SCALE". It was sited on page 5 and I do not have time right now to resource the entire 29 pages that have followed. Follow along dude!"

Considering the dossier now comes with warranty disclaimers by the 2 intel agencies I would say its officially debunked... again.

originally posted by: Xcathdra
Considering the dossier now comes with warranty disclaimers by the 2 intel agencies I would say its officially debunked... again.

Seconded

a reply to: Xcathdra

That article is dated Feb 2015. Did you mean to link to it?

Something is happening.

Something big and wicked !!

Something sinister.



Be afraid
Be very afraid

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Xcathdra

That article is dated Feb 2015. Did you mean to link to it?

Yeah it just popped on my twitter feed.

my bad and apologies.

a reply to: Xcathdra

Twitter. It's a butthole sometimes!

a reply to: xuenchen

To you but not to the people that will matter in this investigation. He served as MI6for over twenty yesrs.
He thinks his information is pretty accurate. Not 100% which I understand is the standard you require for validity but we don't always get perfection.

Guess we'll see how much stock Mueller puts in it.
Steele is pretty confident he will be validated at the end of the day.

a reply to: xuenchen


That thread was put in the hoax forum. This lady is a nut. Please please tell me you are joking.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen


Please please tell me you are joking.

OK

"You are joking".

a reply to: Sillyolme

So say the MSM

a reply to: Xcathdra

It sure as hell has more credence than the dribble you morons are posting about q, a storm and indictments.