12 sealed indictments now.....

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Vasa Croe

No idea but I'm hoping it rips a gaping hole between the perceived political spectrum.

Six of each would do quite nicely.

I've seen on Twitter that its actually up to 22 sealed indictments now after the Clerk's office closed today.

originally posted by: tigertatzen

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Vasa Croe

No idea but I'm hoping it rips a gaping hole between the perceived political spectrum.

Six of each would do quite nicely.

Oh, jeez. 6 in one, half dozen in the other!

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Doesn't matter who's names are on the indictments.

If the broke the law then they deserve to be brought to justice.

a reply to: trb71

I won't be surprised if they are not all Trump people, Muller is as guilty or more than hellary. But we have a fox in the hen house, Christopher Wray, the new FBI director, and this kind of stuff is his specialty...

originally posted by: judydawg
a reply to: trb71

I won't be surprised if they are not all Trump people, Muller is as guilty or more than hellary. But we have a fox in the hen house, Christopher Wray, the new FBI director, and this kind of stuff is his specialty...

If only republicans or trump associates are prosecuted while democrats / dem supporters are given immunity the backlash is going to be nasty.

Is there a chance Mueller didn't want any more indictments to come out one way or another before the voting today?

originally posted by: Grambler
Is there a chance Mueller didn't want any more indictments to come out one way or another before the voting today?

That's my thought. It would be a repeat of Comey if he had. He would be accused of trying to sway an election.

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: judydawg
a reply to: trb71

I won't be surprised if they are not all Trump people, Muller is as guilty or more than hellary. But we have a fox in the hen house, Christopher Wray, the new FBI director, and this kind of stuff is his specialty...

If only republicans or trump associates are prosecuted while democrats / dem supporters are given immunity the backlash is going to be nasty.

More tiki-torch marches?

K~

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: Grambler
Is there a chance Mueller didn't want any more indictments to come out one way or another before the voting today?

That's my thought. It would be a repeat of Comey if he had. He would be accused of trying to sway an election.

If that was his thinking, I approve of that.

Unless the indictment is for some reason ridiculously time sensitive, I don't think it would have been fair to the candidates today to have been lumped in with this baggage by members of their party.

a reply to: Grambler

Gee I hope we don't have to wait until Xmas to open them and there better not be a best before date on those suckers .

originally posted by: Grambler
Is there a chance Mueller didn't want any more indictments to come out one way or another before the voting today?

The issue with that is it only applies to candidates. The people running arent linked to the investigation and holding indictments for people who arent attached to a candidate again is going to create a nasty backlash.

Personally I think it has more to do with wanting to round everyone up at once so no evidence is destroyed and so people targeted dont flee the country. I still think, if all the indictments are related to Mueller's investigation, we will wake up with the morning news reporting on the feds taking everyone into custody at once.

originally posted by: aethertek

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: judydawg
a reply to: trb71

I won't be surprised if they are not all Trump people, Muller is as guilty or more than hellary. But we have a fox in the hen house, Christopher Wray, the new FBI director, and this kind of stuff is his specialty...

If only republicans or trump associates are prosecuted while democrats / dem supporters are given immunity the backlash is going to be nasty.

More tiki-torch marches?

K~

No I cant see Soros creating an issue using them again. That seemed to of blown up in Democrats faces.

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: Grambler
Is there a chance Mueller didn't want any more indictments to come out one way or another before the voting today?

The issue with that is it only applies to candidates. The people running arent linked to the investigation and holding indictments for people who arent attached to a candidate again is going to create a nasty backlash.

Personally I think it has more to do with wanting to round everyone up at once so no evidence is destroyed and so people targeted dont flee the country. I still think, if all the indictments are related to Mueller's investigation, we will wake up with the morning news reporting on the feds taking everyone into custody at once.

You are probably right.

However, I think for the record of a candidate has a sealed indictment against them, it's probably better to enforce it before an election than after it.

a reply to: Xcathdra

There were hints in Q's latest that Obama is somewhere ??? What ever that means

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: Grambler
Is there a chance Mueller didn't want any more indictments to come out one way or another before the voting today?

The issue with that is it only applies to candidates. The people running arent linked to the investigation and holding indictments for people who arent attached to a candidate again is going to create a nasty backlash.

Personally I think it has more to do with wanting to round everyone up at once so no evidence is destroyed and so people targeted dont flee the country. I still think, if all the indictments are related to Mueller's investigation, we will wake up with the morning news reporting on the feds taking everyone into custody at once.

You are probably right.

However, I think for the record of a candidate has a sealed indictment against them, it's probably better to enforce it before an election than after it.

In that instance the Hatch Act prevents federal law enforcement from taking action until after the election.

Personally I think the hatch act should go away however I keep coming back to a scenario where law enforcement announces a candidate is under investigation for killing children and feeding them to illegal immigrants and when the election happens and the candidate "under investigation" loses they announce no evidence to support charges.

originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: Xcathdra

There were hints in Q's latest that Obama is somewhere ??? What ever that means

I believe the only criminal cases that could be brought against politicians and stick would be financial crimes. They create a paper trail that can be followed.

A present to ATS:

Q and WhiteHouse Anon are the same person, Steven Miller. Who is also tied up in all of this legal trouble lol.

I

originally posted by: TheOneElectric
A present to ATS:

Q and WhiteHouse Anon are the same person, Steven Miller. Who is also tied up in all of this legal trouble lol.

I

Got a link / source?

a reply to: TheOneElectric

How do you know?