posted on Nov, 7 2017 @ 07:35 AM
This is very sensationalist and is basically saying
If you convert matter and anti-matter into energy via annihilation... you get more energy than fusion... which is obvious
The other part is a statement about, if you create a charmed baryon, the process of it decaying releases more energy than fusion... which again is
The issue and statement in regard to its non practicality is that you have to put loads of energy into making the baryons, you do not get more energy
out than is required to make them, so its a good 'on paper' exercise, but no, isn't really that useful. Weaponization? Seriously, just making a
weaponized particle beam is something that hasn't been done yet... weaponizing this? no, just no.
edit on 7-11-2017 by ErosA433 because: (no