It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Robert Mueller Has Enough Evidence to Charge Michael Flynn, NBC News Reports

page: 17
70
<< 14  15  16    18  19 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 6 2017 @ 07:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
ancient history...


Still factual.




posted on Nov, 6 2017 @ 07:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: soberbacchus
a reply to: aethertek

More to the point. Flynn could have been charged months ago.

The question is why he has gone "dark" and why hasn't he or his son been charged?

I highly suspect the answer is that Flynn & Co are cooperating with Mueller.



Woosley tied the bows for Manafort on Flynn, what he has could bury Flynn & his idiot offspring, so if they have any sense their talking up a storm.

K~



posted on Nov, 6 2017 @ 07:42 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I guess it would depend on how pissed the American people get. It would look like obstruction for a second time and people already are seeing him as not quite truthful to put it kindly. His trust level is low right now as it is.



posted on Nov, 6 2017 @ 07:45 PM
link   
a reply to: aethertek

What it is is a toe in the door. The guy wore a wire. Since July. Maybe he didn't get anything or anyone. Maybe he did. Mueller plays close to the vest.



posted on Nov, 6 2017 @ 07:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
I guess it would depend on how pissed the American people get.


I think far too many people went all in at this point.



posted on Nov, 6 2017 @ 08:01 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

And what do you think that means? How many of those have a respondent with the last name trump? Or Kushner? Or other staff members like Spicer or Scaramucci or even Priebus? Or maybe Bannon?



posted on Nov, 6 2017 @ 08:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: aethertek

What it is is a toe in the door. The guy wore a wire. Since July. Maybe he didn't get anything or anyone. Maybe he did. Mueller plays close to the vest.



So leaking everything you possibly can about your investigation is playing close to the chest??

The sheer amount of leaks coming out of Muellers investigation are staggering...

Close to the chest..... lmao

Back to the OP.... if mueller has enough charge him already.. what is he doing taking a page out of Tom Delonge’s book?


edit on 6-11-2017 by GuidedKill because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 6 2017 @ 08:22 PM
link   
a reply to: aethertek

LOL ! ALL OF THE EVIDENCE...points to the Clintons and the democrats as the ones who were in collusion with the Russians. You libtards can continue to hold onto your ridiculous thread of dire hope that Trump was in collusion but it's not happening.

Here is what will happen.

Trump will continue to be your president until the end of 2020. During that time frame there will be a lot of democrats exposed for the sell out liars they are. Chief among them will be Hillary Clinton.

Time to go wipe some more servers, smash cell phones with hammers, meet on tarmacs with AGs, rig primaries, and pay for more false dossiers. LOL!

GO TRUMP !!!

edit on 6-11-2017 by Outlier13 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 6 2017 @ 08:26 PM
link   
a reply to: GuidedKill


So true GK, however half the BS they peddle didn't come from anywhere near the investigation - it is either made up or their personal opinion being paraded around as facts.

This whole Russia narrative has been blasted to hell in the last few weeks, and the agitprop narrative adjustments have been staggering. Notice they focus much, much less on words like "Russia collusion" or "Trump/Russia conspiracy" and instead appear to be grasping for any combination of half-truths to make it appear that POTUS is under investigation for something.

Like I said from the get-go, this whole thing is MSM spin. POTUS was never the target of any investigation. I call BS on that entire MSM/pop culture driven narrative, and just want to have it in black & white so I can reference back to this post after the investigation concludes.




posted on Nov, 6 2017 @ 08:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: GuidedKill


So true GK, however half the BS they peddle didn't come from anywhere near the investigation - it is either made up or their personal opinion being paraded around as facts.

This whole Russia narrative has been blasted to hell in the last few weeks, and the agitprop narrative adjustments have been staggering. Notice they focus much, much less on words like "Russia collusion" or "Trump/Russia conspiracy" and instead appear to be grasping for any combination of half-truths to make it appear that POTUS is under investigation for something.

Like I said from the get-go, this whole thing is MSM spin. POTUS was never the target of any investigation. I call BS on that entire MSM/pop culture driven narrative, and just want to have it in black & white so I can reference back to this post after the investigation concludes.



All very valid points that a normal level headed person could understand and see in all this. Problem is ATS has a lot of not so level headed people.

They are too busy contributing the dreaded DC propaganda and MSM spin cycle... you know the routine, if the wash didn’t stick the first time throw it all back in the machine, spin it up and try again.






posted on Nov, 6 2017 @ 08:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

And what do you think that means? How many of those have a respondent with the last name trump? Or Kushner? Or other staff members like Spicer or Scaramucci or even Priebus? Or maybe Bannon?




posted on Nov, 6 2017 @ 08:36 PM
link   
a reply to: GuidedKill


I certainly thought so GK!

I mean, Director Mueller isn't pulling any punches here. If there was ANY evidence to suggest wrongdoing on POTUS' behalf, Mueller would've listed him as an "unindicted co-conspirator" in order to prevent executive interference. The fact that he isn't listed as such means there is no evidence of any such conspiracy, which is echoed by the charges that were unsealed against several long-term DC insiders/political operatives (not a single one involved any collusion/conspiracy/etc charge).

None of the charges were related to POTUS whatsoever, with ~90+% taking place throughout a time prior to Trump's candidacy. Since they started so early (what was it? 2006? earlier?), this de facto proves this was not Trump related.

Without evidence, this is a mcNothing-burger with extra bull# and sleeze.
edit on 11/6/2017 by JBurns because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 6 2017 @ 09:11 PM
link   
a reply to: aethertek

More bad news for #CultHillary crowd.

DEEP corruption inside Robert Mueller’s office as it’s revealed his top lawyers secretly signed off on the Uranium One deal




attorneys who worked for Mueller as head of the FBI during the Uranium One deal signed off on it despite the fact that the bureau had uncovered massive evidence of criminality involving Russian and American figures, up to and including then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

edit on 6-11-2017 by thepixelpusher because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 6 2017 @ 09:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: aethertek

More bad news for #CultHillary crowd.

DEEP corruption inside Robert Mueller’s office as it’s revealed his top lawyers secretly signed off on the Uranium One deal




attorneys who worked for Mueller as head of the FBI during the Uranium One deal signed off on it despite the fact that the bureau had uncovered massive evidence of criminality involving Russian and American figures, up to and including then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.


This has been known for some time.

As of now, it's nothing more than a bat# Right Wing conspiracy, hoping to discredit the current investigation by connecting it with some concocted conspiracy involving Obama, Hillary and Russia.
edit on 6-11-2017 by introvert because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 6 2017 @ 09:44 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert


These allegations were around well before the 2016 election. There is certainly enough suspicion to warrant an investigation. Any chance of corruption/collusion needs to be fully investigated, right?



posted on Nov, 6 2017 @ 09:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: introvert


These allegations were around well before the 2016 election. There is certainly enough suspicion to warrant an investigation. Any chance of corruption/collusion needs to be fully investigated, right?


It was investigated and went to trial.

The corruption came in the form of the head of a US transportation company acting as a subsidiary of Rosatom pushing a no-bid contract in which kickbacks were received.

The FBI knew all about it.



posted on Nov, 6 2017 @ 09:57 PM
link   
Anybody else picking up the rumors about the Podestas being hauled in to be arraigned and that Hillary is next on the chopping block? All this pedophile and sexual predator stuff coming from Hollywood is related, something is coming. Hillary is already being separated from the DC herd. And the Saudi Arabia situation has to factor in. They are tight with the deep state and human trafficking is big in that circle.



posted on Nov, 6 2017 @ 10:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dutchowl
Anybody else picking up the rumors about the Podestas being hauled in to be arraigned and that Hillary is next on the chopping block? All this pedophile and sexual predator stuff coming from Hollywood is related, something is coming. Hillary is already being separated from the DC herd. And the Saudi Arabia situation has to factor in. They are tight with the deep state and human trafficking is big in that circle.


Yes. There was a thread on that created and it was sent to the LOL forum.

It was a hoax.

www.abovetopsecret.com...
edit on 6-11-2017 by introvert because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 6 2017 @ 11:56 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

Man with some of these freaking bizarre stories I'm beginning to think they're just getting punked by their "resources".

They must be pushing the pizza play again.

K~



posted on Nov, 7 2017 @ 12:14 AM
link   
a reply to: aethertek


If by resources you mean taking names (like company B) out of official indictments to postulate on Clinton's connections to those implicated (like the Podesta group, which Tony abruptly resigned from? why again?) then you'd be mistaken. Just taking a page out of your playbook.

Why not?

Why did Tony Podesta resign again? Didn't you all also have Donna Brazile and E. Warren randomly come out about Clinton's defrauding Bernie donors (into thinking their candidate had a chance to win)? It wasn't random. They're abandoning ship, before the Trump force hurricane starts.

But, you know, all of the criminal allegations against Hillary Clinton by Dir. Comey was RWNJ lies. Right? Heh.

Seems you should take care of your own house before worrying about ours.

As usual,
to your extremely biased, extremist, arrogant and snobbish postings. And you probably wonder why so many people have called you out for your virulent bigotry also, huh?
edit on 11/7/2017 by JBurns because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
70
<< 14  15  16    18  19 >>

log in

join