Conservatives Introduce Bill Demanding Robert Mueller's Resignation

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Mach2

Who? name them. Be sure to use sources too.

Matt Gaetz
Andy Biggs
Louie Gohmert

For example. You can google it if you want sources. WSJ, Bloomberg, Washington Times, New York Post have all done stories on it.

a reply to: introvert

Such hyperbole.

What is going on with the Democrats?

Democrat Fury At Report Of Hillary Clinton Rigging Primary Election

a reply to: burntheships

Such hyperbole.

I think it's the truth.

The Right Wing mainstream now incorporates paranoia and conspiracy in to their political agenda.

Benghazi is a great example.

It's that sort of mindset that gave way to Trump being elected.

We let the nuts take over control of the WH.

What is going on with the Democrats?

What does that have to do with what I said?

At least you are direct with your deflections.

a reply to: burntheships

If he is too compromised, which it appears he is he should be replaced immediately!

I think they all ready looked at how to do that and the best option was that Trump could fire him without just cause . Or he could step down himself ... Once again I say that Comey who started all this could just take one for the team and throw himself under the bus ...

a reply to: introvert

Congress has the responsibility to uphold the process of law.
When The FBI becomes politicized it must be investigated.

There is nothing conspiratorial about holding Special Counsel
accountable. Just look at what James Ceomey did as the FBI
director when he thought Leretta Lynch was compromised!

He took matters into his own hands. Did you a problem with that?
Was Comey a right wing nut?

This is a legal process, introduced to Congress by way of measure.
There is no abuse of power here...

a reply to: the2ofusr1

Trump could.

I think the better option is to replace him,
and agree with De Santis that he needs a limited scope
of investigation....

originally posted by: Dudemo5

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: RazorV66

They are very nervous.

I think perhaps they have lost control of the narrative and are
running out of time to scheme.

More like the alt-right fake news factory is pumping nonsense into those who want to believe. Uranium One was a blatantly obvious attempt to draw the media (and ESPECIALLY THE REPUBLICAN BASE) away from the obvious implications of the Manafort indictment.

They've got to keep you guys in a constant state of rage against the opposition, or you'll get discouraged and tune out of the political process. And then you won't show up to support your guy at the booth. Which of course they can't abide.

The good news for them is that you guys have proven over and over that you'll literally believe any stupid thing they print.

Well, maybe not anything. But they know your triggers. Ever wonder why Hillary keeps coming up? No, it's not because she pops up making speeches or giving interviews every now and then. It's because you guys hate her. And the alt-right propaganda factory knows damned well you'll eagerly suck up any salacious tidbit damning her.

Hey they are playing your song......

a reply to: burntheships

Congress has the responsibility to uphold the process of law. When The FBI becomes politicized it must be investigated.

There is nothing conspiratorial about holding Special Counsel
accountable. Just look at what James Ceomey did as the FBI
director when he thought Leretta Lynch was compromised!

Accountable for what? Unfounded conspiracies claiming he has been compromised?

He took matters into his won hands. Did you a problem with that? Was Comey a right wing nut?

His decision was based on the idea that her meeting with Bill could compromise the perceived integrity of the FBI and did not want to want the FBI's work to be considered "tainted" by her actions.

This is a legal process, introduced to Congress by way of measure. There is no abuse of power here...,

I did not say there was an abuse of power here.

I thought Mueller was going after Clinton and Obama.

a reply to: introvert

The accusations of Mueller's conflict of interest and
being compromised are founded in facts.

They are facts you do not like to talk about.
Was he, or was he not FBI director during the
Uranium One Investigation?

a reply to: burntheships

They are facts you do not like to talk about. Was he, or was he not FBI director during the Uranium One Investigation?

He was, but it appears the accusations being made surrounding the U1 issue are paranoid conspiracies.

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: introvert

The accusations of Mueller's conflict of interest and
being compromised are founded in facts.

They are facts you do not like to talk about.
Was he, or was he not FBI director during the
Uranium One Investigation?

would you be happier if mueller just dropped everything against trump and his cronies?

a reply to: burntheships

I think the better option is to replace him

Seeing as SC does not have any oversight who could replace him ? legally ?

a reply to: introvert

Your certainly entitled to your opinion.
Even if it is unfounded.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: seeker1963

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: carewemust

A basket of deplorable crooks are running the country, why do you think there are so many scandals under this administration so far?

We're not even a year in so far and it's already this bad. Trump has no idea how to run a country. At all, and he's picking swamp monsters left and right for key positions.

He has been blocked from doing everything from the establishment crooks from both parties.

It's insane that people let Trump get away with convincing them of this idiocy. EVERY other President had to accept blame for not getting things done, but when it happens to Trump it's everyone else's fault. Remind me again where the buck is supposed to stop.

You say "EVERY". Remind me again about how often Obama blamed his predecessor? Oh yeah, six years into his term at least.

Wanna provide a source for this "EVERY" claim?

a reply to: the2ofusr1

I don't know, I suppose it would fall to the DOJ again?

I personally think Mueller should resign. If they do not have
a way to replace him, that might be all the better.

or, alternatively, Congress can cut his budget, or not approve of it.

Congress can get rid of Mueller any time it pleases. So can Trump but he won't do it because of optics, why should an innocent man fire his accuser when Congress can do it.

a reply to: TinfoilTP

Agree 100%.

You said it better than I.

originally posted by: burntheships

a reply to: introvert

Your certainly entitled to your opinion.
Even if it is unfounded.

The accusation surrounding U1 are unfounded.

a reply to: burntheships

I don't know, I suppose it would fall to the DOJ again?

Sessions reused himself ... There is a long debate that took place over this very subject and it boiled down to a lesser of bad ideas .Its a catch 22 situation as far as I can understand it .