It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

UFO Stalks Mars Rover Caught On Camera

page: 2
10
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 1 2017 @ 11:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: Skywatcher2011

originally posted by: SlowNail
a reply to: Skywatcher2011

On Mars?
you have proof otherwise that life doesn't exist on Mars?


Do you have proof that it does?




posted on Nov, 1 2017 @ 11:59 AM
link   
a reply to: Xzavior

Which sols?



posted on Nov, 1 2017 @ 11:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: CraftBuilder
This and other particulate matter that is blowing around on mars has been stalking the rover for years.
the rocks in mars have also been following the rover around for years as well



posted on Nov, 1 2017 @ 11:59 AM
link   
a reply to: Skywatcher2011

No, of course not.

You got proof it's a Martian bird?



posted on Nov, 1 2017 @ 12:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: odzeandennz

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Xzavior

originally posted by: luke1212
a reply to: Xzavior

All I see is what looks to be a small rocky hill or montainy terrain top left and right. Don't see any ufo. Or anything at all flying for that matter.


Loot at center left to see UFO


You mean the thing that stationary for 2 frames?

What makes you think it’s a, a ufo and b, stalking the rover?


the voices...aka wishful thought of it being true


I wish I had million in my bank account.

*holds breath, crosses fingers, wishes really hard*

Damn. Didn’t work



posted on Nov, 1 2017 @ 12:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Skywatcher2011

originally posted by: SlowNail
a reply to: Skywatcher2011

On Mars?
you have proof otherwise that life doesn't exist on Mars?


Do you have proof that it does?
no...but scientists have said in past that life may exist on Mars. What life they don't know. So I introduce the probability it could be a bird or fly.



posted on Nov, 1 2017 @ 12:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: Skywatcher2011

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Skywatcher2011

originally posted by: SlowNail
a reply to: Skywatcher2011

On Mars?
you have proof otherwise that life doesn't exist on Mars?


Do you have proof that it does?
no...but scientists have said in past that life may exist on Mars. What life they don't know. So I introduce the probability it could be a bird or fly.


Ok. By that logic it could be Aladdin, a black unicorn or god poo.



posted on Nov, 1 2017 @ 12:02 PM
link   
a reply to: Deaf Alien

Actually, that's a good question. Who knows?

Hardly the "probable" explanation for what's going on in the image, mind.



posted on Nov, 1 2017 @ 12:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Skywatcher2011

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Skywatcher2011

originally posted by: SlowNail
a reply to: Skywatcher2011

On Mars?
you have proof otherwise that life doesn't exist on Mars?


Do you have proof that it does?
no...but scientists have said in past that life may exist on Mars. What life they don't know. So I introduce the probability it could be a bird or fly.


Ok. By that logic it could be Aladdin, a black unicorn or god poo.
the probability of a flying organism can still be 0%. I was not speaking logic. That is childish thinking you have. If you have ever taking a statistics course like I have then you would agree that I am 100% right.



posted on Nov, 1 2017 @ 12:05 PM
link   
a reply to: Xzavior

i see the 'ufo' in 2 frames of the gif but obviously is far too small to study in any detail.
i'd like to see the original images of which the gif is made. do you have links to these?



posted on Nov, 1 2017 @ 12:08 PM
link   
It doesn't seem that the gif frames are in any particular order. The two frames that shows a black mark at top right could be anything, but is more likely debris on the same camera.



posted on Nov, 1 2017 @ 12:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: CraftBuilder
This and other particulate matter that is blowing around on mars has been stalking the rover for years. These take to regularly suctioning themselves to the camera optics via mysterious quantum forces.








Unless outright faked, I'd say particulate matter as well
edit on 11/1/2017 by vlawde because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 1 2017 @ 12:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Skywatcher2011

Show me the statistics that would make you 100% right.

Or are you on about the likelyhood that, because in other “UFO” images and videos it’s been a bird or a bug, so (somehow) it must be one on Mars too?



posted on Nov, 1 2017 @ 12:13 PM
link   
Left camera:


Right camera:


Debunked.

mars.nasa.gov...



posted on Nov, 1 2017 @ 12:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Skywatcher2011

Show me the statistics that would make you 100% right.

Or are you on about the likelyhood that, because in other “UFO” images and videos it’s been a bird or a bug, so (somehow) it must be one on Mars too?
if you want me to draw up a probability model for you I can. You just have to pay me for my time doing it. How about you research statistics courses and then we talk. The theory behind me speaks for itself.



posted on Nov, 1 2017 @ 12:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Skywatcher2011

Just because EARTH based images have been birds or bugs, doesn’t mean MARS based images are.

Your “statistics” are flawed.



posted on Nov, 1 2017 @ 12:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Skywatcher2011

Just because EARTH based images have been birds or bugs, doesn’t mean MARS based images are.

Your “statistics” are flawed.
P(Bird or Fly) = P(bird) + P(fly) - P(bird and fly)
= P(0) + P(0) - P(0) = 0
edit on 1-11-2017 by Skywatcher2011 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 1 2017 @ 12:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Skywatcher2011

The most complicated method you could have used to say, "It's not a bird or fly".



posted on Nov, 1 2017 @ 12:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Skywatcher2011

Just because EARTH based images have been birds or bugs, doesn’t mean MARS based images are.

Your “statistics” are flawed.
post note...spoken like someone who hasn't taken post secondary mathematics and probability theory course in statistics. I will pat you on the head.
edit on 1-11-2017 by Skywatcher2011 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 1 2017 @ 12:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: SlowNail
a reply to: Skywatcher2011

The most complicated method you could have used to say, "It's not a bird or fly".
that is also correct and the probability of that could still be 0!!!! Yay we are finally learning probability theory here



new topics

top topics



 
10
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join