Las Vegas Shooting - Guard In MGM Room

originally posted by: Xcathdra

Shaping the story in their favor is a definite possibility.

The other side of that is the Casino knows they are going to be sued by those injured and the families of those killed. If the security officer gives interviews it can open up the liability floodgates. While the security officer was involved in a very small but critical point of the events, it wont stop the media from filling in the blanks themselves if they ask a question the officer cant answer completely.

I hadn't considered this before. Has Jesus only been invented to protect the Casino, do you think?

It would stand to reason that, if Jesus Was taken out of the equation, it might take longer for officers to work out where he was (I.e. would still be going room to room in floors below even after the time that Jesus allegedly alerted everyone, as they were). It also stands to reason that, if Campos wasn't there at all, then none of the MGM Staff were able to locate the shooter, would this fact alone be enough to be sued by victims and families of the dead?

originally posted by: djz3ro

originally posted by: Xcathdra

Shaping the story in their favor is a definite possibility.

The other side of that is the Casino knows they are going to be sued by those injured and the families of those killed. If the security officer gives interviews it can open up the liability floodgates. While the security officer was involved in a very small but critical point of the events, it wont stop the media from filling in the blanks themselves if they ask a question the officer cant answer completely.

I hadn't considered this before. Has Jesus only been invented to protect the Casino, do you think?

It would stand to reason that, if Jesus Was taken out of the equation, it might take longer for officers to work out where he was (I.e. would still be going room to room in floors below even after the time that Jesus allegedly alerted everyone, as they were). It also stands to reason that, if Campos wasn't there at all, then none of the MGM Staff were able to locate the shooter, would this fact alone be enough to be sued by victims and families of the dead?

That’s quite possible, however there are multiple cameras at the roof level on the outside fascia of the Mandalay Bay. Plus other exterior cameras of there’s, which would’ve helped triangulate the location where the gunfire was originating from. For instance, the ones directly above the room of the shooter(‘s), at the roof level outside of the MB, as well as the ones on the exterior lower roof/Perimeter of the valet drive-thru/grand entrance of the MB, facing north/northwest. Those two locations of exterior MB cameras would be all they’d need to have been able to triangulate an approximate location of the shooter(s).

a reply to: djz3ro

I am not sure to be honest. I guess it could be plausible. I do remember someone pointing out the SSN Campos used is linked to another name that is also Hispanic sounding.

Thanks for the contributions all of you. I really don't have anything more to say without going into speculation - which is what we all have been doing for a month now - except I just don't buy the story they have given us so far. What little of a story they have given us has almost no facts that seem legit and it's a month later and still nothing has come out.

All we can do right now is guess and guessing without facts has already been done over the last month.