It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Southern Guardian
Oh for gods sake!
If people want to serve and they are able to serve, then they should be free to serve.
This is a stupid move on Trumps part.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: SlapMonkey
Thank you for that excellent post. When it comes to protecting our nation, political correctness and emotion should always take a back seat to logic Effectiveness and efficiency.
I was thinking the same thing. Talk about a manic Monday.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
He is not having a good start to his week is he?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
He is not having a good start to his week is he?
Has he had a good start to ANY of his weeks?
originally posted by: strongfp
There wasn't an issue with transgender people in the military before.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: FissionSurplus
If the individual is mentally capable and physically capable of doing the job, then they should be able to do the job.
In my opinion.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: FissionSurplus
If the individual is mentally capable and physically capable of doing the job, then they should be able to do the job.
In my opinion.
How does the military know if you weren't born the sex you enlist with?
originally posted by: Hazardous1408
No demographic should be banned from killing innocent people and becoming cannon fodder for the elite.
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
The Judge was appointed by Bill Clinton.
More resistance bs. It will get appealed until it gets to a Judge that is not a Clinton stooge.
originally posted by: musicismagic
originally posted by: Hazardous1408
No demographic should be banned from killing innocent people and becoming cannon fodder for the elite.
Yes, its only a matter a time now that people with mental disabilities are allowed into the military, then people that are in wheelchairs, then people that are over the age of 32 able to join, then people that need their parents to hold their hands while in boot camp. And the list can go on and on...
I trust you mean commander in chief.
originally posted by: craterman
Trump is the commander and chief, he is above the generals and the judicial has no role to play whatsoever.
Got a link to back that statement up? My guess is it was a "Don't ask don't tell" sort of situation. I'll bet there have been transgenders serving throughout this countries military history but nobody talked about it and nobody really cared.
WTF? They were outright banned from the military for the entire history of this country's military
I agree yet this is a far cry from your first claim. So which is it, there was an outright ban or there wasn't a ban?
It would be far more accurate to say there wasn't an issue with banning them before the pandering began.
So what is the role of the US courts? Obey Trump or the constitution?
As for the OP, once again a US court forgets it's role and bench activism bites America in the ass.
originally posted by: Southern Guardian
a reply to: carewemust
Personally I think if they're willing to put their lives on the line, risk their welfare, then they deserve coverage for reassignment surgery. Also, what percentage of the budget does reassignment surgery take out of the military? My guess, next to nothing.
Further to the above, why ban transgendered person(s) as a whole for this single benefit? Why not ban the benefit itself? Why target an entire class of people joining and serving the military?
It's just not making logical sense you know?
So, with just these two notes pointed out, we have a situation where a KNOWN personality issue that can warrant clinical diagnoses and administrative discharges exists in people who want to join the military (or are currently serving). Why in the world would we want to invest so much money and time into individuals who are basically ready to be "chaptered" out of the military?
1952: "Ex-GI becomes blonde beauty!" screamed one headline as newspapers in the United States broke the news.
George Jorgensen, a quiet New Yorker, shocked a nation by returning from a trip to Denmark transformed into the glamorous Christine.
Chris Beck was a fearless Navy SEAL, one could even say reckless. “Come out motherf—er!” he would shout to the Taliban as he charged into the caves of Afghanistan. But there was a reason for this. He had been suppressing who he wanted to be for years, which sometimes made him run headlong towards a possible death.
Kristin Beck, a transgender retired Navy SEAL who used to be named Chris, made a splash in the media Wednesday after President Donald Trump announced he would bar transgender people from serving in the military.
A former gun-toting U.S. Marine who weighed 240lbs and drove a muscle car has revealed how she had a sex change to become a woman after admitting she had been running from her real identity.
Sona Avedian, 33, said she had been suppressing her true self by seizing on dangerous deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan as a way of 'overcompensating'.
Ms Avedian, previously Matthew, even married and fathered a child before coming to terms with her identity in 2012 and undergoing a huge transformation.
The American Psychological Association questions the reasoning behind President Trump’s call to bar transgender people from the military. We’ve seen no scientific evidence that allowing transgender people to serve in the armed forces has had an adverse impact on our military readiness or unit cohesion. Therefore, we ask that transgender individuals continue to be allowed to serve their country,” said APA President Antonio E. Puente, PhD.
I'm not saying that all transgender people are unfit for service,
I cannot go in to MEPS, knowing that I'm a schizophrenic, and expect to be hired by the military, or to be able to hide the symptoms that may inhibit my ability to do my job. Instead, the military is unwilling to invest the time and money into me, so they would bar me outright from enlistment.
A June 2016 study from the RAND Corporation estimated that there were between 1,320 and 6,630 transgender active-duty service members — out of 1.3 million service members in total — and noted that not all of them would seek treatment related to gender transitioning. The study also estimated that the cost associated with medical care for gender transition would only increase military health care expenditures by between $2.4 million and $8.4 million each year — an increase of between 0.04 and 0.13 percent.
I understand how non-PC it is to discuss gender dysphoria as being a mental condition,
The military is not a Walmart
The Pentagon said Thursday it was ending the ban on transgender people being able to serve openly in the U.S. military.