Punk Bible

Right so, joint rolled, a can of Blackthorns Dark Fruit cider in one hand "The punk Bible by vincent Guppi - " in the other ... it begins...
No not yet let me put on Joe Smooth's Promised land up loud on the stereo..
www.youtube.com...
need a big soundtrack for this one - 24 divergent Gospels told directly by the Angels and Devils themselves --this is going to be interesting...
It begins
"People of Earth, we came in peace but brought enmity and war instead. You could say that the Devil made this world and it was truly paradise before him. There were other times this story was told. The Manichaeans of the 3rd Century Ad were as powerful as the Jews and Christians but had a religion based on the Book of Enoch, A 300BC Jewish account of the First 200 angels on earth and how that let to the flood. In 325AD the first Council of Nicaea banned Enoch to only the Ethiopian Bible, and the Gnostic Jewish and Christian believers were outlawed as heretics. INterest in the book surfaced again after the Dead Sea Scrolls, in which there were lacunae. Then in 1945 the Nag-Hammadi library was discovered, paving the way for a renewed interest
in extant Gospels until finally, we arrive here. There were many times our story was almost not told, some decided at the end of a gun's barrell. May humanity read and know forever where we are from and where we are going"

Bless us and save us what reading delight have I let myself in for..the story of how Angels and Devils "helped "shape this planet and it's inhabitants -- you could'nt make the truth up. Time for another joint and Liquid"s - Sweet Harmony
www.youtube.com...

Luv old skool nice tunes amigo will hava a read also at Vincent guppi ..

a reply to: DpatC


Yes of course lets blame the fact that mankind ignored the 6th commandment by declaring those who disagree with the "creed" or were of a different color. were declared subhuman.

How about punk BS attitude that transcends any particular ideology including yours.

The Book of Enoch is an apocryphal and pseudepigraphic text. It is falsely ascribed to Enoch. Produced probably sometime during the second and first centuries B.C.E., it is a collection of extravagant and unhistorical Jewish myths, evidently the product of exegetical elaborations on the brief Genesis reference to Enoch. This alone is sufficient for lovers of God’s inspired Word to dismiss it. Especially the bolded parts are an issue for me. Lovers of truth have no need to falsely ascribe a book to someone who didn't write it. Enoch already died centuries before that. This fits the pattern of behaviour of the God of lies, mysteries and confusion: Satan.

a reply to: whereislogic

Enoch didn't die