It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

REPORT: Barack Obama Paid Nearly $1 Million To Firm That Created Fake Trump Dossier

page: 11
92
<< 8  9  10    12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 31 2017 @ 08:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: MOMof3
The rich have a lot of money to spend. Let's give them more, with the biggest tax cut in history!


Absolutely !!

I know I would sleep better knowing the rich are not mad a me.





posted on Oct, 31 2017 @ 10:29 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

I'm sure the Obama's didn't know you cared.



posted on Oct, 31 2017 @ 10:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: spiritualzombie

The fact this thread refers to it as ‘fake’ dossier qualifies it for the hoax bin (along with most threads by this OP)


You do know that there is an alert function to notify the administration of this site if a thread is false or a post otherwise violates the T&C if you feel that strongly about a particular thread or post, right?

Anything to say on the topic of the thread?

 


There are multiple connections between Obama and Fusion GPS:

NYT Reporter: MY Sources Say Rinat Akhmetshin Worked With Fusion GPS Founder For Years

Breaking: Russia Lawyer Veselnitskaya Worked with Obama's Ambassador to Russia?

Will probably be doing a thread on them some time soon.



posted on Oct, 31 2017 @ 11:17 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen
Lol biased much?
How do you know it's fake and how do you know the money was for the dossier? You don't.
The Trump dossier was created by an ex British spook as opposition research for an "unknown"(most likely jeb) republican primary candidate. The opposition research was then passed on to Hillary's campaign, where they didn't use the information because they didn't have proof.

Lmfao isn't that hilarious? Not using something on Trump just because you don't have proof. Democrats need to stop caring about facts if they ever want to win again lol.



posted on Oct, 31 2017 @ 11:22 AM
link   
IRONIC how many "patriotic" and freedom-loving Americans willingly pass along the propaganda headlines of a foreign government.

"I love 'Murica! Here's some JUICY headlines and memes from Russian trolls..."

Strange times, indeed.



posted on Oct, 31 2017 @ 11:26 AM
link   
a reply to: jadedANDcynical
Lmfao almost every post on ATS is false or misleading. A LOT of misleading, not quite lying, more like omitting certain facts so that the story reflects their fragile world views.

If we started taking false posts down this whole website would be empty lol. It's a conspiracy website. You can call it alternative news, but most of the people on here that aren't long time conspiracy buffs are just peddling fake news that makes them feel safer or outraged at whoever they perceive as their enemy.



posted on Oct, 31 2017 @ 11:34 AM
link   
a reply to: DanteGaland
Infowars has been using RT news as their source for information for years, they've also been regular guests of the state sponsored Russian propaganda machine.

Foreign Russian news to support their local American ideals, weird indeed.

But then again infowars and Alex Jones are a sham. They have a specific demographic of gullible people and they squeeze as much money out of them as possible.

Alex Jones under oath in court admitted he was playing a character. Basically saying he's an entertainer not a newsman. Kinda like Colbert from the Colbert Report, except Alex Jones' viewers take him seriously XD



posted on Oct, 31 2017 @ 11:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: GokuVsSuperman0
a reply to: xuenchen
Lol biased much?
How do you know it's fake and how do you know the money was for the dossier? You don't.
The Trump dossier was created by an ex British spook as opposition research for an "unknown"(most likely jeb) republican primary candidate. The opposition research was then passed on to Hillary's campaign, where they didn't use the information because they didn't have proof.

Lmfao isn't that hilarious? Not using something on Trump just because you don't have proof. Democrats need to stop caring about facts if they ever want to win again lol.
How did you know it was created by a British spook for the GOP then handed off to the Clintons who just sat on it cause they're so moral??? Lmao



posted on Oct, 31 2017 @ 11:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: GokuVsSuperman0
a reply to: jadedANDcynical
Lmfao almost every post on ATS is false or misleading. A LOT of misleading, not quite lying, more like omitting certain facts so that the story reflects their fragile world views.

If we started taking false posts down this whole website would be empty lol. It's a conspiracy website. You can call it alternative news, but most of the people on here that aren't long time conspiracy buffs are just peddling fake news that makes them feel safer or outraged at whoever they perceive as their enemy.

How do you know what's misleading and what's not? Our own Deep State is probably worse than Russia and probably at least as bad as the old Pravda propaganda arm of the communist party.



posted on Oct, 31 2017 @ 11:47 AM
link   
a reply to: GokuVsSuperman0

Ive met conservatives that THOUGHT Colbert (when on Comedy Central) was a REAL conservative pundit.




posted on Oct, 31 2017 @ 11:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: smurfy

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: xuenchen

What in the heII though? There is writing up the left side of the photo in one passport...the other doesn't have that and has a blue USA watermark at the top of the pic in that same font we have on our currency. One photo is more tightly cropped than the other.

I need to figure out the difference in the two passports being passed off as one. The stamps shown in the video are on a 'Visa' stamp page...BUT later in the video and further back, in the alleged *one-&-only passport* for Barack Obama, there is a stamp that I think is from France.

Going to keep digging. I feel like the truth about Obama is yet to be known.

Don't mean to derail...just to add....




There may be several passports for all we know, they only last ten years. Obama had to get a new one, anyway..as president, and probably a new picture as well.
After all, the Obama family are involved with CIA



posted on Oct, 31 2017 @ 11:54 AM
link   
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus
Because the British spook said he did it. And it wouldn't make sense for Obama or Clinton to fund opposition research on 1 of 14 or so republican primary candidates. Especially the one no one thought would get the nomination.

Ah logic

Hillary didn't do anything with the dossier because she was still playing the old ways of politics. In hindsight, bad idea. Not necessarily out of some moral decision, probably more a logistics decision. They can't prove it and it might backfire, so better to just not use it.
edit on 31-10-2017 by GokuVsSuperman0 because: Stuff n things



posted on Oct, 31 2017 @ 01:13 PM
link   
a reply to: GokuVsSuperman0

It wouldn't really? Even if both parties are in cahoots with the people in power like Soros and the Rothschild? Is that not just a little naive ? Or is it an excuse on the Democrats behalf ?



posted on Oct, 31 2017 @ 01:14 PM
link   
More lies from the left and the media which propagates them...



posted on Oct, 31 2017 @ 01:22 PM
link   
a reply to: GokuVsSuperman0

But the "dossier" wasn't "exposed" until after the election.




posted on Oct, 31 2017 @ 01:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: GokuVsSuperman0

But the "dossier" wasn't "exposed" until after the election.



exactly.... why would the GOP used it against Trump in the primary to promote Jeb? And then give it to the Clintons who sit on it till it's over. Makes no sense whatever.



posted on Oct, 31 2017 @ 01:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: GokuVsSuperman0
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus
Because the British spook said he did it. And it wouldn't make sense for Obama or Clinton to fund opposition research on 1 of 14 or so republican primary candidates. Especially the one no one thought would get the nomination.

Ah logic

Hillary didn't do anything with the dossier because she was still playing the old ways of politics. In hindsight, bad idea. Not necessarily out of some moral decision, probably more a logistics decision. They can't prove it and it might backfire, so better to just not use it.
Of course .... British spook more truthful than CIA . .... some people really believe it's only America ....how silly. I always like to remind people the most powerful people invited to the Bilderbergs are from around the world.



posted on Oct, 31 2017 @ 01:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: GokuVsSuperman0
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus
Because the British spook said he did it. And it wouldn't make sense for Obama or Clinton to fund opposition research on 1 of 14 or so republican primary candidates. Especially the one no one thought would get the nomination.

Ah logic

Hillary didn't do anything with the dossier because she was still playing the old ways of politics. In hindsight, bad idea. Not necessarily out of some moral decision, probably more a logistics decision. They can't prove it and it might backfire, so better to just not use it.
oh better not to
Use it till there were no other plays left in the book....and even then there's still no basis to it.
edit on 31-10-2017 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 31 2017 @ 02:20 PM
link   



posted on Oct, 31 2017 @ 02:24 PM
link   
a reply to: Steak

Madame president and speaker of the house?



new topics

top topics



 
92
<< 8  9  10    12 >>

log in

join