It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

It's Manafort and It's From 2012 or Earlier.

page: 3
36
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 29 2017 @ 12:47 PM
link   
a reply to: Dudemo5

The problem is, manafort doesn't have anything to turn over. He worked for trump for like 3 months.




posted on Oct, 29 2017 @ 12:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
I think it could be a Trump.

Not say the Donald.

But I think that it really could be someone whose last name is Trump.

If its not then yeah, probably Manafort.

Definitely not Flynn, I think Flynn might be the guy who is going to be a witness to the whole sorry affair.



Well, I would say Kushner, trump JR, Flynn, For my top pics. I see you disagree on Flynn, and that's okay, we will find out tomorrow, finally. This is only the first indictment, I am sure there will be more.


So much for trump and his "Witch Hunt".







posted on Oct, 29 2017 @ 12:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: kurthall

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
I think it could be a Trump.

Not say the Donald.

But I think that it really could be someone whose last name is Trump.

If its not then yeah, probably Manafort.

Definitely not Flynn, I think Flynn might be the guy who is going to be a witness to the whole sorry affair.



Well, I would say Kushner, trump JR, Flynn, For my top pics. I see you disagree on Flynn, and that's okay, we will find out tomorrow, finally. This is only the first indictment, I am sure there will be more.


So much for trump and his "Witch Hunt".






And Stone is as sleazy as Manafort and should be on your list. And let's not forget Bannon.....

This is just the beginning....

edit on 29-10-2017 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 29 2017 @ 12:58 PM
link   
a reply to: kurthall


So much for trump and his "Witch Hunt".


Actually this indictment proves that it was, in fact, a witch hunt.



posted on Oct, 29 2017 @ 12:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: kurthall

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
I think it could be a Trump.

Not say the Donald.

But I think that it really could be someone whose last name is Trump.

If its not then yeah, probably Manafort.

Definitely not Flynn, I think Flynn might be the guy who is going to be a witness to the whole sorry affair.



Well, I would say Kushner, trump JR, Flynn, For my top pics. I see you disagree on Flynn, and that's okay, we will find out tomorrow, finally. This is only the first indictment, I am sure there will be more.


So much for trump and his "Witch Hunt".






yup nice to see some justice.

I just want to sit back and watch the Trumpstars try to defend this.



posted on Oct, 29 2017 @ 12:59 PM
link   
Fist off, at this point everything is rumor, so I will believe it when I see it.

Second, just because it may be on crimes in 2013, this is not proof that Trump is not going to be in some sort of trouble. It certainly doesn't prove he is in trouble either. As I have been saying, both sides will spin it to their benefit if its manafort, but it does not prove which way the investigation is heading.

Lastly, even if its manafort from 2013, that still doesn't let trump off the hook for having bad judgement in hiring him. It may not be a crime, but it makes trump look damn foolish.



posted on Oct, 29 2017 @ 01:04 PM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite

Yep. Your supposition does match the time line better than my memory served.



posted on Oct, 29 2017 @ 01:06 PM
link   
it will be manafort podesta



posted on Oct, 29 2017 @ 01:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: kurthall
a reply to: Dfairlite



Seems to me you have 0 to back this up, so until tomorrow, this post is a big "nothingburger" . trump is on a rampage right now, attacking everyone and everything on twitter. He always does that to deflect, so you alt right have something to focus on other than him.









Hey, it is a nothingburger deluxe. Don't be discounting this thread even though there is no official verification that it is true. We will find out tomorrow what is happening, this thread is sort of a prediction.
edit on 29-10-2017 by rickymouse because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 29 2017 @ 01:27 PM
link   
I feel that we are all going to be dissappointed when we find out who was charged and what they were being charged with. Maybe there might be just minor charges being levied. Just something to try to show that they are actually doing something for all that money they are getting.



posted on Oct, 29 2017 @ 01:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: windword

Now wait a minute. Wasn't it hillary that was working with the Ukrainians?


That's how you answer the question "Who are your sources"?


You have zero credibility!



posted on Oct, 29 2017 @ 01:40 PM
link   
We will probably simply hear the sound of some unknown person being thrown under the bus...(with a press conference to follow explaining the convoluted way this individual was nailed.)

Remember....

Mueller was there during Uranium One.
Mueller was there during Fast and Furious.
Mueller is James Comey's friend and mentor.



posted on Oct, 29 2017 @ 01:45 PM
link   
ah yes, well do i remember the outrage from conservatives when ken starr spent time upon time trying to come up with something on whitewater, and ended up having to go with blowjob lies to appease his base in such a cowardly move...

oh wait, i don't remember that at all


besides, if it's manafort and for older crimes, it's just so they can squeeze him and flip him to get to the real dirt.

i mean, duh?



posted on Oct, 29 2017 @ 02:14 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

I'm not sure I understand this line of thinking. It took a special counsel 10 months to have enough evidence for an indictment (not conviction, yet) and yet trump was supposed to know about this when he hired him for three and a half months?



posted on Oct, 29 2017 @ 02:15 PM
link   
a reply to: windword

You weren't talking to me. You were addressing BurnsE



posted on Oct, 29 2017 @ 02:21 PM
link   
a reply to: fiverx313

What real dirt do you think there is? Manafort and trump worked together for three or four months....



posted on Oct, 29 2017 @ 02:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: fiverx313

What real dirt do you think there is? Manafort and trump worked together for three or four months....


fortune.com...



posted on Oct, 29 2017 @ 02:31 PM
link   
a reply to: fiverx313

I'm not sure what you think that said, but I don't see any dirt.



posted on Oct, 29 2017 @ 02:34 PM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite


You still haven't answered the question.



posted on Oct, 29 2017 @ 02:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: fiverx313

I'm not sure what you think that said, but I don't see any dirt.


if you could see the dirt from here, why would they need a special prosecutor?



new topics

top topics



 
36
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join