It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Stop Defending Trumps treatment of Women.

page: 26
109
<< 23  24  25    27  28  29 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 30 2017 @ 07:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
a reply to: TruMcCarthy

I think what you're missing is that for some people there are deal breakers.


Deal breakers for what? We should just give up on the country then? Hand it over to the socialists, communists and anti-American forces? (who by the way have just as many perverts as any group). If Trump has done something that leads to an impeachment or imprisonment, that is in the jurisdiction of the law. You can't just throw a President out of office because you don't like him personally. You can disapprove of Trump's personal behavior, and still support his political policies. At this point, that is the only option. I'm not going to change my political beliefs because Trump is a sex fiend.
edit on 30-10-2017 by TruMcCarthy because: (no reason given)




posted on Oct, 30 2017 @ 07:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
a reply to: TruMcCarthy

I think what you're missing is that for some people there are deal breakers. When Trump sexualizes kids, or brags about sexual assault, and exhibits all of this disturbing behavior, and then 16 women come out and accuse him of what he's already admitted to... It's too much. it's a deal breaker.

Trump Supporters try to normalize this... So what kind of people will that attract?


The only one sexualizing children is you by bringing us false or absolutely unsubstantiated charges. People have the right to be tried in a Court of law for their crimes. Slandering a person you hate is not how to win neutrals either.


I'm not slandering anything. His words. Recorded.

I think you agree with him.



posted on Oct, 30 2017 @ 07:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: windword

Did you happen to miss the other two times this case was attempted even after the Eppstein conviction?


U.S. District Court Judge Dolly Gee dismissed that case in May, ruling that Johnson's complaint didn't raise valid claims under federal law. Gee, an appointee of President Barack Obama, noted that the suit cited a criminal statute that doesn't give rise to civil damages and that the civil statute Johnson cited only applies to actions based on "race-based or class-based animus." Another version of the suit was filed in federal court in June, but withdrawn in September after apparently never being served on the defendants. The case was refiled later that month. The second and third iterations of the complaint accused Trump of only a single act of rape, but said he had "sexual contact" with the accuser on three other occasions. A declaration from an anonymous witness attached to the later suits continued to accuse Trump of four acts of rape or sexual assault.


www.politico.com...


Why would a Rape victim drop a case without compensation who was 13 year old? If it is true, justice for all.


This case was brought 3 different times. The latest lawyer for the alleged victim just happened to be the daughter of a DNC delegate.

As I stated (I did a whole thread on this) then, let her bring her case. If it's political BS, it only hurts the thousands of women whom have or may have legitimate cases.


It appears that hate makes these people grasp at straws to bring the Trump down no matter the lies and spin they have to use to get it done. Rats running from the Wienstien ship should be a clue for the people when trying to equivocate anything we have currently seen about the POTUS. Other movie producers and actors are being exposed every few hours now for their behavior that would make Trump blush.



posted on Oct, 30 2017 @ 07:56 PM
link   
This may be the mudpit, and certain rules are a bit laxer here than elsewhere on the boards,

That, however, does not not excuse attacks of a personal nature!

That stops now.

Do Not Respond To This Post.



posted on Oct, 30 2017 @ 07:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: TruMcCarthy

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
a reply to: TruMcCarthy

I think what you're missing is that for some people there are deal breakers.


Deal breakers for what? We should just give up on the country then? Hand it over to the socialists, communists and anti-American forces? (who by the way have just as many perverts as any group). If Trump has done something that leads to an impeachment or imprisonment, that is in the jurisdiction of the law. You can't just throw a President out of office because you don't like him personally. You can disapprove of Trump's personal behavior, and still support his political policies. At this point, that is the only option. I'm not going to change my political beliefs because Trump is a sex fiend.


Yoour choices are not incest/pedo/sex predator OR the socialist--- which by the way, if that was your only choice, you're still crazy not to pick the socialist--- but good news, you don't have to vote and support the guy who sexualizes kids every chance he gets. You don't have to support the guy who wants to bang his own daughter. There are other Republican... I assume some are good people.



posted on Oct, 30 2017 @ 08:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: spiritualzombie

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
a reply to: TruMcCarthy

I think what you're missing is that for some people there are deal breakers. When Trump sexualizes kids, or brags about sexual assault, and exhibits all of this disturbing behavior, and then 16 women come out and accuse him of what he's already admitted to... It's too much. it's a deal breaker.

Trump Supporters try to normalize this... So what kind of people will that attract?


The only one sexualizing children is you by bringing us false or absolutely unsubstantiated charges. People have the right to be tried in a Court of law for their crimes. Slandering a person you hate is not how to win neutrals either.


I'm not slandering anything. His words. Recorded.

I think you agree with him.


I think i have a sister who was a victim of one of those monsters you creepy leftist!!!!

He went to prison.

So, Don't you dare tell me one of your fantasy's and slander my name. You must be a sick evil person pretending to care about children to make political hay.

You have no right.



posted on Oct, 30 2017 @ 08:02 PM
link   
a reply to: Justoneman

If that's the case I'm not sure why you seem to be supporting a guy who is so predatory toward women, who sexualizes every girl no matter what age.



posted on Oct, 30 2017 @ 08:02 PM
link   
a reply to: Justoneman

It's all they have. Other arguments don't stand up to the scrutiny of factual information. So, what's one to do but go after anyone perceived as to support the action they already concluded in their minds as guilt.

It's how we got here, it's how Trump actually became a candidate. Stupidity got us here.



posted on Oct, 30 2017 @ 08:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: spiritualzombie

originally posted by: TruMcCarthy

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
a reply to: TruMcCarthy

I think what you're missing is that for some people there are deal breakers.


Deal breakers for what? We should just give up on the country then? Hand it over to the socialists, communists and anti-American forces? (who by the way have just as many perverts as any group). If Trump has done something that leads to an impeachment or imprisonment, that is in the jurisdiction of the law. You can't just throw a President out of office because you don't like him personally. You can disapprove of Trump's personal behavior, and still support his political policies. At this point, that is the only option. I'm not going to change my political beliefs because Trump is a sex fiend.


Yoour choices are not incest/pedo/sex predator OR the socialist--- which by the way, if that was your only choice, you're still crazy not to pick the socialist--- but good news, you don't have to vote and support the guy who sexualizes kids every chance he gets. You don't have to support the guy who wants to bang his own daughter. There are other Republican... I assume some are good people.



Well, someone who likes incest isn't going to steal my money and give it to his cronies, or people who don't want to work, so no I don't think I will be supporting a socialist anytime soon, sorry. It's 2017, the next election isn't until 2020 lol. Unless legal processes take over, in fact Trump is our only choice. Wasting 3 years isn't an option, supporting Trump's political policies, while not supporting his personal behavior, is the only option.



posted on Oct, 30 2017 @ 08:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
a reply to: Justoneman

If that's the case I'm not sure why you seem to be supporting a guy who is so predatory toward women, who sexualizes every girl no matter what age.



Case and point, your accusations don't stand on fact, so you have to go to make it personal. It's the same thing everytime.


edit on 30-10-2017 by JinMI because: Spellink



posted on Oct, 30 2017 @ 08:07 PM
link   
a reply to: JinMI

I can't help you if you're incapable of reading, listening or watching video because I've been referencing Trump's own words.



posted on Oct, 30 2017 @ 08:08 PM
link   
a reply to: spiritualzombie

Predatory? Guy is worth billions. He could order 17 5k a night call girls if he wanted. Who cares. It is almost as if some of you are jealous almost that you cannot do the same things you are accusing him of.

The sick thing is some of you bringing 'kids' into this. Of course, it is the line....If Ivanka was my daughter I would date her.

How is thats saying he wants to bang his own daughter? He is complimenting how attractive she is. If you think it is creepy you should truly check your own 'urges' because a normal person does not see anything predatory about saying their daughter is attractive.

I support a platform that he ran on. I have not seen ANY evidence that he did anything wrong. The Billy Bush tape? That is a guy talking to another guy about chasing women. Not little kids. Not his daughter. Saying that being rich and popular puts you around a bunch of women. Do you REALLY think there are not women who threw themselves at him he turned away? There is no pay to play like Weinstein that someone mentioned earlier. Has a Miss USA Or Miss Universe come forward to say she slept with him for a win? Nope.



posted on Oct, 30 2017 @ 08:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
a reply to: JinMI

I can't help you if you're incapable of reading, listening or watching video because I've been referencing Trump's own words.




Despite common believe, being an a-hole with proof to the concept is not illegal. Nor does it make anyone supporting him for reasons public and not, make them sexual predators.



posted on Oct, 30 2017 @ 08:12 PM
link   
Here is the thing. Some members in here want to claim that just because President Trump has been accused he must have been guilty... Despite the fact that rich people have been accused of similar things, yet it doesn't make them guilty...

BTW, why is it that so many people in the left still see Clinton as an idol, and a "defender of women" when she has defended her husband's behaviour and sexual attacks on women, and she has attacked and threatened women who accused him?...

So Clinton has not only defended her husband, but she has called women who accused him as "bimbos", "narcissistic loony toon", "bimbo eruptions", "trailer trash" "I would crucify her". Not to mention the fact that she defended a rapist of a 12 year old, and she admitted she knew the man was guilty when she said she had him take a polygraph test, and when he passed it, it destroyed her belief in polygraph tests, and then she laughs about it... Not to mention her comments about "we have to destroy her story" when saying what to do about women who have accused her husband of rape or sexual assault.

So, why is it that "supporters of Hillary" want to give her a pass and don't want to comment how it reflects on them for supporting her and claiming "she is all in favor of women's rights" yet you want to use anything and everything said by Trump, or accusations against Trump as some sort of evidence against Trump supporters?...




edit on 30-10-2017 by ElectricUniverse because: correct comment.



posted on Oct, 30 2017 @ 08:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: TruMcCarthy

originally posted by: spiritualzombie

originally posted by: TruMcCarthy

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
a reply to: TruMcCarthy

I think what you're missing is that for some people there are deal breakers.


Deal breakers for what? We should just give up on the country then? Hand it over to the socialists, communists and anti-American forces? (who by the way have just as many perverts as any group). If Trump has done something that leads to an impeachment or imprisonment, that is in the jurisdiction of the law. You can't just throw a President out of office because you don't like him personally. You can disapprove of Trump's personal behavior, and still support his political policies. At this point, that is the only option. I'm not going to change my political beliefs because Trump is a sex fiend.


Yoour choices are not incest/pedo/sex predator OR the socialist--- which by the way, if that was your only choice, you're still crazy not to pick the socialist--- but good news, you don't have to vote and support the guy who sexualizes kids every chance he gets. You don't have to support the guy who wants to bang his own daughter. There are other Republican... I assume some are good people.




Well, someone who likes incest isn't going to steal my money and give it to his cronies, or people who don't want to work, so no I don't think I will be supporting a socialist anytime soon, sorry. It's 2017, the next election isn't until 2020 lol. Unless legal processes take over, in fact Trump is our only choice. Wasting 3 years isn't an option, supporting Trump's political policies, while not supporting his personal behavior, is the only option.


I see, so you may not agree with it, but you go with it anyway. You stay quiet and you take it because there's something you hope to get out of it, even though it means surrending your principles. So you're basically letting Trump grab you by the p*ssy. And for the next 3 years you're going to defend him. So you're one of the enablers. Got it.



posted on Oct, 30 2017 @ 08:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: spiritualzombie

Predatory? Guy is worth billions. He could order 17 5k a night call girls if he wanted.


Yep, he could, but apparently he prefers to spend that money on furniture so he can f*ck a married woman.

Clearly there is a factor of power in what he prefers. Of course he can pay for it... But he seems to prefer his entitlement to just take what he wants.



posted on Oct, 30 2017 @ 08:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: spiritualzombie

originally posted by: TruMcCarthy

originally posted by: spiritualzombie

originally posted by: TruMcCarthy

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
a reply to: TruMcCarthy

I think what you're missing is that for some people there are deal breakers.


Deal breakers for what? We should just give up on the country then? Hand it over to the socialists, communists and anti-American forces? (who by the way have just as many perverts as any group). If Trump has done something that leads to an impeachment or imprisonment, that is in the jurisdiction of the law. You can't just throw a President out of office because you don't like him personally. You can disapprove of Trump's personal behavior, and still support his political policies. At this point, that is the only option. I'm not going to change my political beliefs because Trump is a sex fiend.


Yoour choices are not incest/pedo/sex predator OR the socialist--- which by the way, if that was your only choice, you're still crazy not to pick the socialist--- but good news, you don't have to vote and support the guy who sexualizes kids every chance he gets. You don't have to support the guy who wants to bang his own daughter. There are other Republican... I assume some are good people.




Well, someone who likes incest isn't going to steal my money and give it to his cronies, or people who don't want to work, so no I don't think I will be supporting a socialist anytime soon, sorry. It's 2017, the next election isn't until 2020 lol. Unless legal processes take over, in fact Trump is our only choice. Wasting 3 years isn't an option, supporting Trump's political policies, while not supporting his personal behavior, is the only option.


I see, so you may not agree with it, but you go with it anyway. You stay quiet and you take it because there's something you hope to get out of it, even though it means surrending your principles. So you're basically letting Trump grab you by the p*ssy. And for the next 3 years you're going to defend him. So you're one of the enablers. Got it.


Well, if I did let Trump grab me by the P, that isn't sexual assault, since I am letting him. There goes 1 fake talking point of the Left about Trump being a sexual predator. And secondly, I have said I disagree with Trump's personal behavior, ok now what? I can't get the President kicked out of office because I don't like his personal behavior. There's nothing more I can do in regards to that. I do like Trump's political policies, and so I will support them. As I said, I'm not going to change my political beliefs because of someone's sexual proclivities. Should people hate JFK's policies because he was a whore-monger? I will support what I feel is best for America, with or without Trump.



posted on Oct, 30 2017 @ 08:21 PM
link   
Donald Trump has been making disturbing comments about young girls for years

This isn’t the first time Trump has said something like this, as the examples below prove. And that’s troubling on a number of levels, said Dani Bostick, a counselor and advocate who specializes in child abuse, sexual assault, domestic violence, and trauma counseling.

Bostick feels Trump’s comments rise to the level of sexualizing children. “The kind of language he uses to describe children in sexual ways is very dangerous,” she said.

Bostick emphasized that she couldn’t speculate on whether Trump could actually be a pedophile, noting that “not all people who sexualize children are pedophiles, but all pedophiles sexualize children.” So when public figures talk this way about children, she said, it definitely enables people who are pedophiles. And that puts children at real risk of harm.


I just don't see how this is okay.



posted on Oct, 30 2017 @ 08:24 PM
link   
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

What about Hilary's treatment of women. Specifically hiring thugs to terrorize them? Trump doesn't even come close.



posted on Oct, 30 2017 @ 08:24 PM
link   
a reply to: spiritualzombie

She asked to get the furniture. Like she did not know what was going on....please...



new topics

top topics



 
109
<< 23  24  25    27  28  29 >>

log in

join