It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Clinton Pattern - From Uranium One to Saudi and Qatar

page: 1
81
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+51 more 
posted on Oct, 28 2017 @ 06:25 PM
link   
When reading the Uranium One story, i couldn't help but think the story seemed vaguely familiar.

Here is a thread on what has came out this week.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

In short, we now know that the FBI had an informant that was looking into some of the players in the Uranium one deal for Bribery and such in 2009, before the Uranium One deal was voted on. This informant claimed that the russians were attempting to bribe the Clintons. We also know that the Clinton Foundation did indeed get large amounts of money from players in the deal. We also now know that Bill clinton personally meant with Putin around this time, and recieved a speaking fee weeks later in of 500 thousand dollars.

Then comes the Podesta Group, which is founded by the campaign chair of Hillary, and ran by her brother. See this thread.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

It turns out that Manafort, was working with the Podestas to help lobby on russias behalf on things like Uranium One. We also know that the Podesta group lobbied for Russia on other policies, like removing sanctions.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

So why did this sound familiar.

A controversial policy, Bill Clinton directly talking with leaders, the Podesta group then working for the leaders Bill met with?

And then I remembered this.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

From that thread, which was based on a wilileaks email.

"So on August 17 2014 Hillary is writing that she knows that Saudi is a state sponsor of ISIS, and says we should pressure them. The next Month, Bill meets with the Saudis, and two weeks later, the Podesta Group that is connected to the Clintons is hired to represent the Saudis."

And just like in the uranium one issue, it just so happens the Clinton foundation and Bill clinton and the Podesta group ended up getting tons of money from the Saudis.

So their is a controversy with saudis, Bill meets the leader of the saudis, the podesta group starts lobbying for them, the controversy goes away, and the podesta group Bill and the foundation get tons of money.

Its the same pattern as Uranium One.

But wait, there is more.

Notice in that thread its not just the Saudis sponsoring Isis, but also Qatar.


Clinton sent the email on August 17, 2014 to Podesta. It was an eight-point plan to defeat ISIS in Iraq and Syria. Clinton’s email said that the United States should support Kurdish forces on the ground with U.S. military advisers and avoid the use of a conventional ground operation.

“While this military/para-military operation is moving forward, we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region,” Clinton wrote.


dailycaller.com...

Now news from today.

The former prime minister of Qatar admitted that they worked with the US and others to fund rebels that were groups like al nursa (an al Qaeda affiliate).


In an interview with Qatari TV Wednesday, bin Jaber al-Thani revealed that his country, alongside Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and the United States, began shipping weapons to jihadists from the very moment events "first started" (in 2011).

Al-Thani even likened the covert operation to "hunting prey" - the prey being President Assad and his supporters - "prey" which he admits got away (as Assad is still in power; he used a Gulf Arabic dialect word, "al-sayda", which implies hunting animals or prey for sport). Though Thani denied credible allegations of support for ISIS, the former prime minister's words implied direct Gulf and US support for al-Qaeda in Syria (al-Nusra Front) from the earliest years of the war, and even said Qatar has "full documents" and records proving that the war was planned to effect regime change.


www.zerohedge.com...

And who was Secretary of State at the time in the US, that would have been intentionally funding al nursa in Syria; Hillary Clinton!

And as the thread on the saudis showed, Qatar too gave the Clinton Foundation money.

And then there is this.


The Clinton Foundation has said it accepted a $1 million gift from the Qatari government without notifying the State Department that it had done so, an apparent violation of an ethics agreement Hillary Clinton signed when she became Secretary of State in 2009.

Under the terms of the agreement, Clinton promised the foundation would notify the State Department's ethics official if a new foreign government wished to donate or if a current foreign donor wished to "increase materially" its contributions.

Qatari officials pledged the money in 2011 to mark former President Bill Clinton's 65th birthday. The following April, Amitabh Desai, the Clinton Foundation's foreign policy director, emailed several of his colleagues to say that the Qataris wanted to meet Bill Clinton "'for five minutes' in NYC to present [the] check." Hillary Clinton served as secretary of state until Feb. 1, 2013.


www.foxnews.com...

Thats right, again Bill Clinton was personally involved!

And the Podesta group? Well they werent hired by Qatar, and that was apparently a mistake. Because now the Podesta group is working with the Saudis to blame Qatar for sponsoring terrorism.



The Podesta Group has registered as a foreign agent for a U.S.-based Saudi group that has been running advertisements attacking Qatar for its alleged terrorism ties.


thehill.com...

This shows more questionable policies followed by meetings with Bill clinton and donations to the clinton foundation

And independent of that, it shows the entire Obama stance in the Syria conflict were a lie; Assad was fighting terroist funded by the US from the get go. This on its own is an outrage.



So not once, not twice, but three times we see this pattern; a controversial policy involving foreign countries shows up, Bill clinton has a meeting with leaders in that country, twice the Podesta group is hired by that country, the clinton Foundation gets tons of money from that country, and then the country gets the policy they wanted that Hillary iss connected to.

It seems too much to just be coincidence







edit on 28-10-2017 by Grambler because: (no reason given)



+19 more 
posted on Oct, 28 2017 @ 06:35 PM
link   
It’s just mind blowing how corrupt politics has become.

The swamp needs to be drained.

Term Limits

No lobby groups whatsoever

Jail time for corrupt politicians



posted on Oct, 28 2017 @ 06:35 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 28 2017 @ 06:38 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 28 2017 @ 06:40 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 


+10 more 
posted on Oct, 28 2017 @ 06:41 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler


It seems too much to just be coincidence


That's because it's no coincidence (and a no-brainer) that dodgy Clinton(s) have engaged in corruption to further their own personal agenda. George Soros does the same thing all the time - money talks and BS walks and the easiest way to gain power and control in the Capitalist society of the USA is to play into the very-real human desires to have lots and lots of money so as to live the life of Riley.

The pattern is 'dodgy' and it is very obvious to even blind Freddy that Hillary Clinton is the dodgiest person god has ever pumped breath into so it stands to reason that her entire conduct is questionable (aka: dodgy)



posted on Oct, 28 2017 @ 06:43 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 28 2017 @ 06:45 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 28 2017 @ 06:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Kettu

All according to "a book" and a CNN interview.

the old "disinfo-info-disinfo" routine.




posted on Oct, 28 2017 @ 06:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: whywhynot
a reply to: Kettu

Why attack and make it about the OP? This isn’t the mud pit.


The topic, content of the topic, and the entire premise of the topic are being promoted by the Russian government.

Don't you wonder why the Russian government is paying young Russians to sit in St. Petersburg office buildings promoting this narrative?



posted on Oct, 28 2017 @ 06:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Kettu

Russia has played many sides to make people question the government.

So far it's working. But that doesn't constitute picking and choosing which side you want to acknowledge slipping.

Are you implying uraniumone was a kosher deal?


+10 more 
posted on Oct, 28 2017 @ 06:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kettu

originally posted by: whywhynot
a reply to: Kettu

Why attack and make it about the OP? This isn’t the mud pit.


The topic, content of the topic, and the entire premise of the topic are being promoted by the Russian government.

Don't you wonder why the Russian government is paying young Russians to sit in St. Petersburg office buildings promoting this narrative?



What I was wondering was why you cannot offer comments without swiping at the OP.



posted on Oct, 28 2017 @ 06:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Kettu

All according to "a book" and a CNN interview.

the old "disinfo-info-disinfo" routine.





Next thing you know there will be a video that stirs its audience to violence


+5 more 
posted on Oct, 28 2017 @ 06:56 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

You know, it's funny that there is no hashtag anywhere in your OP and the only criticism that can be levied against you is a man of straw.

The Clintons learned a lot when they were running the same scams in Arkansas. The Clinton Foundation is just their old standby Arkansas Development Finance Authority souped up and on an international level.


+10 more 
posted on Oct, 28 2017 @ 06:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kettu

originally posted by: whywhynot
a reply to: Kettu

Why attack and make it about the OP? This isn’t the mud pit.


The topic, content of the topic, and the entire premise of the topic are being promoted by the Russian government.

Don't you wonder why the Russian government is paying young Russians to sit in St. Petersburg office buildings promoting this narrative?



Dont you wonder why the Kremlin had their officials spread the dirt on trump in the dossier that you peddle in the first place?

Oh, and russians say Isis is a problem that we need to fight, so I guess we cant believe that argument either.

Seriously, this is a ridiculous argument.

Rejecting facts because someone you dont like is saying them is not a reasonable argument.



posted on Oct, 28 2017 @ 06:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

What we see and are able to see are state actors of the puppet masters behind the IC . Nothing that is done escapes their prying eyes and they get to make sure their instructions are carried out . Politicians know when they get the job its not to serve us plebs and they have to walk a type rope to look to appease the electorate while fulfilling the wishes of their masters . The masters could care less if they lie and cheat their way to the top ,in fact I think they actually prefer it that way ...
edit on 28-10-2017 by the2ofusr1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 28 2017 @ 07:15 PM
link   
OK, That'll be quite enough.

Let's now try the topic, shall we? Actually, no shall we about it. The topic, or don't post.

This is not the mud pit.


+5 more 
posted on Oct, 28 2017 @ 07:19 PM
link   
Damn nice detective work Grambler!
The Clintons sure do leave a wide mark in their path.
Usually littered with money and blood.
It's time they got prosecuted for their crimes.
I hope that's part of the storm Trump was talking about.

The Clintons are the figureheads of the mafia behind PROMIS software.
That was their tool to find dirt on opponents and gain political leverage.
No wonder they've gotten away with so many crimes for so long, they knew they could always take someone else down with them.
edit on 28-10-2017 by Asktheanimals because: (no reason given)


+7 more 
posted on Oct, 28 2017 @ 07:20 PM
link   
There's a reason Obama didn't appoint a permanent IG for Hillary's state department. I have a feeling he was getting some under the table, too.



posted on Oct, 28 2017 @ 07:27 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler


First off, I'd like to say how much I admire the level you have taken this. Way beyond anything I can work.

Many, many of us, function more on instinct, or perhaps intuitively. At any rate, your work is appreciated!

Here's a few points I'd like to make. Regarding your pattern, many have commented on the 'change' of views by Hillary and Co. over the years following speaking engagements by Bile err Bill. I have zero doubt if one had the access, time and funds, one could document and collate those events almost from day one.

In fact, it's safe to assume it has been done. Perhaps by many. Yet nothing has been done with it or about it. That's the crux of it. Both sides of the aisle? A few occupying both sides? This cannot, by any logic, have gone on as long as it has without far more backing than even the Clintons are capable of.

I am at a loss what can be done about it, if it does go well beyond the Clintons and it IS likely that it does.

In any event, WATCH YOUR SIX...take care.




top topics



 
81
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join