It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by StarBreather
Look what happened to Iraq. An advanced country in the middle east, on its way to democracy, now wrecked and destroyed.
Originally posted by Amuk
Originally posted by StarBreather
Look what happened to Iraq. An advanced country in the middle east, on its way to democracy, now wrecked and destroyed.
Saddam was a Democratic ruler?
Please explain how Saddam was moving them toward Democracy before we attacked?
Originally posted by StarBreather
"On its way to democracy" is an external observation of the evolution of the nation-state, as conditions of life improve.
With or without Saddam, Iraq was way more advanced than Saudi Arabia, in every aspect. Sooner or later, the people of Iraq would demand democracy.
In this context, American intervention has been a setback, until now totally destructive, with no positive points (besides ending dictatorship, so what?).
This is true but dated. In the late 70s Iraqi was the economic and intellectual hub of Arab civilization. They were on the brink of (more blablablah)
Originally posted by StarBreather
I was referring to Iran, not Iraq.
Look what happened to Iraq. An advanced country in the middle east, on its way to democracy, now wrecked and destroyed.
The monarchicrule of the Shah Reza Pahlavi had American support, until he was deposed by revolutionaries (like Khomeini).
Khomeini was not only an "Islamic radical" but also a strong nationalist. Not at all like Saddam (a regular politician turned dictator), but a planner for the long term.
Because this turn of events didn't please Washington, they have since been wary of any act of self-determination coming from Iran. Here is something they can't control.
Iran is a sovereign country, Iran can do as it pleases.
Saddam was nothing if not a nationalist, and I don't know how you call somebody a "regular politician" when he comes up as an interrogator and secret police boss, then assumes power by placing his president under house arrest.
Saddam was also a great planner. What makes Saddam stand out among Arab leaders, according to his biographer, is that he was organized and a planner. So where is the difference?
lets not forget the oppression of young Iranians who are against the theocratic government. They get their butts kicked by mobs of stick-wielding zealots every time they open their mouth. You do remember that don't you, or do I have to dig up old news articles?
Economically it can. According to the UN though it is not lawful for them to persue nukes unless they are on the security council.
Then there are human rights to consider. No amount of sovreignity justifies Iran's treatment of women and pro-democracy students.
Originally posted by SiberianTiger
Once again I gotta prove you ( Spliff 4020 ) wrong AGAIN about YOUR constitution, so I'll shut it DOWN RIGHTNOW, NO WHERE, NOWHERE!! in the U.S. constitution do your founding Father's EVER, EVER EVER, EVER use the word Democratic Republic, DEMOCRATIC, nor DEMOCRACY, NOT ONE TIME , NOT EVEN ONE TIME, ANY WHERE in the 1. Declaration of Independance, 2. The Constitution, 3. The Bill Of Rights, nor 4. The Federalist Papers, not ONCE and to ALL, AND I MEAN ALL YOU AMERICANS who are reading this I Infinetly DARE ANY of YOU to Pick up YOUR Constitution and TRY and PROVE me wrong ONCE AND FOR AAAAALLLLLLL !!
[edit on 13-2-2005 by SiberianTiger]
Originally posted by firestarter666
u know what....america has a really bad attitude toward those in the middle east, asia and even europe.....
north korea already has nukes china is close and iran is workin on it....
when that day comes that the u.s. makes someone really mad we are goin to me crushed....too many enimes in too many places.....i cant wait for the day when the u.s. to go up in smoke
Originally posted by SiberianTiger
No moving in any direction from me, back on topic, so what do you have to say about the Democracy thing hu?
Originally posted by SiberianTiger
No moving in any direction from me, back on topic, so what do you have to say about the Democracy thing hu?
Originally posted by SiberianTiger
keep quiet cuz I'm talking to SPLIFF 4020.
Originally posted by SiberianTiger
keep quiet cuz I'm talking to SPLIFF 4020.
Our constitution lays the foundation for a democratically elected republican form of government. The use of the words is completely irrelevant. Suppose I wrote a contract in which I agreed to pay somebody for causing you to die, but didn't use the word "hitman"- the person I hired would still be a hitman. Same with our constitution. The contents of the document clearly overwhelm any attempt to argue over the wording.