It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Isn't it funny how precedent is being set and no one realizes it?
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Isn't it funny how precedent is being set and no one realizes it?
Sheeeeeeit.
Perpetually upping the bar of hypocrisy surrounding precedents of voodoo ethics is the basis of the partisan hackery credo's from every stripe out there.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Isn't it funny how precedent is being set and no one realizes it?
Sheeeeeeit.
Perpetually upping the bar of hypocrisy surrounding precedents of voodoo ethics is the basis of the partisan hackery credo's from every stripe out there.
Just look at how hard some (not all) of them are trying to legitimize it.
"But it was only an american firm they paid, but some of the info in the dossier may have been true, but Trump is bad!"
It is unbelievable how someone can twist to defend even the most authoritarian abuses if it helps their side.
originally posted by: JinMI
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Isn't it funny how precedent is being set and no one realizes it?
Sheeeeeeit.
Perpetually upping the bar of hypocrisy surrounding precedents of voodoo ethics is the basis of the partisan hackery credo's from every stripe out there.
Just look at how hard some (not all) of them are trying to legitimize it.
"But it was only an american firm they paid, but some of the info in the dossier may have been true, but Trump is bad!"
It is unbelievable how someone can twist to defend even the most authoritarian abuses if it helps their side.
Just curious, why do you seem surprised?
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Isn't it funny how precedent is being set and no one realizes it?
Sheeeeeeit.
Perpetually upping the bar of hypocrisy surrounding precedents of voodoo ethics is the basis of the partisan hackery credo's from every stripe out there.
Just look at how hard some (not all) of them are trying to legitimize it.
"But it was only an american firm they paid, but some of the info in the dossier may have been true, but Trump is bad!"
It is unbelievable how someone can twist to defend even the most authoritarian abuses if it helps their side.
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Isn't it funny how precedent is being set and no one realizes it?
Sheeeeeeit.
Perpetually upping the bar of hypocrisy surrounding precedents of voodoo ethics is the basis of the partisan hackery credo's from every stripe out there.
Just look at how hard some (not all) of them are trying to legitimize it.
"But it was only an american firm they paid, but some of the info in the dossier may have been true, but Trump is bad!"
It is unbelievable how someone can twist to defend even the most authoritarian abuses if it helps their side.
It is amazing the lack of self retrospective that comes with statements like this.
originally posted by: pavil
Probably because Fusion bank records will show that Fusion had that Female Russian Lawyer on their payroll. The one who visited Donald Jr. and Manafort.
link
If that's the case, it's game over.
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
Since when does the FBI outsource an investigation anyway?
originally posted by: pavil
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
Since when does the FBI outsource an investigation anyway?
When it involves supposed Russian hacking of DNC servers. You know, because having the FBI actually examining the Servers is soooo hard.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: pavil
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
Since when does the FBI outsource an investigation anyway?
When it involves supposed Russian hacking of DNC servers. You know, because having the FBI actually examining the Servers is soooo hard.
Yep just listen to the dems. Russian influence is the most serious possible thing, we dust fight it in the hardest possible terms.
So we will have the fbi, one of the greatest investigative bodies the world has ever seen....
Outsource the investigation of the server and getting dirt on trump from Russian agents to people being paid by the dnc!
You couldn't make this up if you tried.
originally posted by: spiritualzombie
I bet i know the answer to the question posed in the title... wouldn’t be Trump or Russia or this investigation into possible collusion... must be.... Hillary?
Can’t be the content of the report and what’s true or not true... we’re not interested in any of that.... must be... Hillary?
In other words, the DNC was colluding with Russia, in an attempt to prove russian collusion.
originally posted by: derfreebie
In other words, the DNC was colluding with Russia, in an attempt to prove russian collusion.
...with a Republican: facilitated by the incumbent
Dem POTUS and All the King's Men. [s]No Biggie.[/s]
I'd offer you a beer, Grambler.. but my recent thirst
has generated a taste for something a lot stronger.
And tomorrow's maybe PayDay, big time. With the
proviso that no lefty is going to want to spin this gi-
GANTIC spherical turd on any weekend T.H. S#t shows.
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: introvert
Is it ok to get dirt from russians on your political opponent?
If its not, is it ok to pay an american company to pay someone to get dirt from russians on your pollitical opponent?