It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Leaked Las Vegas SWAT Audio Indicates Police Gunned Down Stephen Paddock in Hotel

page: 2
47
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 24 2017 @ 07:16 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen


Assuming this is real, why would the police want to hide it ?


Indeed. Who would fault anyone for opening fire upon entering the room on someone who had just fired a couple thousand rounds on unsuspecting, unarmed and defenseless people??? It'd be a badge of honor.

And especially because the sound of a gunshot (singular) was always part of the audio and transcripts -- so they denied what was already noted.

Having said that, this doesn't really tell us anything the headline wants us to believe. We have no idea how many shots were fired, where those shots were aimed -- could have been fired at the billowing curtain startling the officer. And even if it was fired at "Paddock," we still don't know that it actually killed him. He could have been dead already.

I hope there's a youtube soon.
edit on 24-10-2017 by Boadicea because: "could" to "couple"




posted on Oct, 24 2017 @ 07:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen I fear many things are being covered up with the entire affair.


not half.



posted on Oct, 24 2017 @ 07:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: xuenchen


Assuming this is real, why would the police want to hide it ?


Indeed. Who would fault anyone for opening fire upon entering the room on someone who had just fired a could thousand rounds on unsuspecting, unarmed and defenseless people??? It'd be a badge of honor.

And especially because the sound of a gunshot (singular) was always part of the audio and transcripts -- so they denied what was already noted.

Having said that, this doesn't really tell us anything the headline wants us to believe. We have no idea how many shots were fired, where those shots were aimed -- could have been fired at the billowing curtain startling the officer. And even if it was fired at "Paddock," we still don't know that it actually killed him. He could have been dead already.

I hope there's a youtube soon.

Agreed.
In cases like this , "he who hesitates is dead"

Anyone ever think this is still an investigation ?



posted on Oct, 24 2017 @ 07:27 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

We can eliminate that possibility. He wouldn't have been within a country mile of the SWAT team doing their business.



posted on Oct, 24 2017 @ 07:32 PM
link   
a reply to: Gothmog


Agreed.
In cases like this , "he who hesitates is dead"


Exactly. Of all the things I take objection to in this atrocity, that sure as hell ain't gonna be one of 'em!


Anyone ever think this is still an investigation ?


The only investigation left is for those of us trying to investigate their sorry stories!!!



posted on Oct, 24 2017 @ 07:39 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

I am actually getting sick of this story.


It is truly quite obvious that there is a cover up going on most possibly due to a Federal agency being involved and they are covering ass.

I doubt we will even get an "official" report due to fear of being exposed later.
edit on 24-10-2017 by infolurker because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 24 2017 @ 07:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Aliensun
a reply to: IAMTAT

We can eliminate that possibility. He wouldn't have been within a country mile of the SWAT team doing their business.

Not if he was there before the team arrived on 32?

If Campos was the "officer" that shot Paddock ...in order to keep the 'suicide' narrative alive, Campos (who was already observed on 32 by the maintenance guy) would have to be recast as an unarmed hotel security guy to explain his presence.



posted on Oct, 24 2017 @ 07:41 PM
link   
a reply to: olaru12

The shooter wasn't Paddock. Paddock was probably "offed" before the shooting started. Paddock is a convenient patsy, the fall guy. This shooting looks more and more like a MIC "Corporate" hit with multiple players in a coordinated attack. The real question is the motive. I'd guess this thing was carried out by "Contractors" along the lines of Black Water. The real question is who hired them and why.



posted on Oct, 24 2017 @ 07:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: olaru12

The shooter wasn't Paddock. Paddock was probably "offed" before the shooting started. Paddock is a convenient patsy, the fall guy. This shooting looks more and more like a MIC "Corporate" hit with multiple players in a coordinated attack. The real question is the motive. I'd guess this thing was carried out by "Contractors" along the lines of Black Water. The real question is who hired them and why.


Or, "Paddock" only exists in the MSM fantasy world.

The "dead body" in the leaked photos could simply be a stage prop dummie.

All those pictures could have easily been created before the night of the shootings.




posted on Oct, 24 2017 @ 08:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: olaru12

The shooter wasn't Paddock. Paddock was probably "offed" before the shooting started. Paddock is a convenient patsy, the fall guy. This shooting looks more and more like a MIC "Corporate" hit with multiple players in a coordinated attack. The real question is the motive. I'd guess this thing was carried out by "Contractors" along the lines of Black Water. The real question is who hired them and why.


Or, "Paddock" only exists in the MSM fantasy world.

The "dead body" in the leaked photos could simply be a stage prop dummie.

All those pictures could have easily been created before the night of the shootings.



I don't understand this logic.

If this crime scene is a staged crime scene, why not make it authentic?

Ah, I forgot, random internet posters have thorough forensic backgrounds lol...



posted on Oct, 24 2017 @ 08:04 PM
link   
a reply to: RomeByFire

Well there's no videos showing flashes from the broken window areas.

Yet the videos we do see have audio of gunshots and no flashes coming from the window areas.

If somebody can figure that out maybe it would make sense.

And some videos actually have 40 watt light bulbs in other rooms showing.




posted on Oct, 24 2017 @ 08:13 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Could be, though I doubt it. They used Paddock as a cover for their operation, at least thats my take. I have worked in the criminal justice system; they would have serious problems with the Medical Examiners office, i.e., they couldn't produce a dummy to the ME's office, better to just deliver Paddock and that way, all eyes are on Paddock as the "lone shooter".

You know.......the REAL question in my mind is how did this go so horribly wrong for the perpetrators and their handlers, or the people who orchestrated this? By "wrong" I mean that within 24 hours of the shooting, the programmed and planned narrative was placed in serious question. They couldn't reconcile the timeline; they refuse to address the acousticle data, (sorry I can't spell tonight). The simply deny the multiple shooters, all the while we have seen eyewitnesses go missing or toes up.

My little theory is that what went wrong is that they didn't put the County Sheriffs department into the loop BEFORE this went down. They had control of LVMPD, but not County. That somewhat explains the discrepensies of the information revealed by the Police radio logs. I think that explains the extreme nervousness of the County Sheriff in the interviews and the reason he doesn't speak in public without the FBI guy standing right next to him.

It reeks of a false flag that went all wrong. I'd guess the Sheriff has been told, "you toe the line or you will end up like the other witnesses who came forward".

I would guess the best way to get to the truth would be to bribe the Casino Security details to tell what they really saw and heard.



posted on Oct, 24 2017 @ 08:27 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

None of the after story supports him being a serious part of the police effort. He was even on that day-time TV show.



posted on Oct, 24 2017 @ 08:31 PM
link   
DP


edit on 27.06.08 by spy66 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 24 2017 @ 08:32 PM
link   
a reply to: TonyS

I've heard nothing about a sniper on the ground or other tall building being a part of the action. I would have gotten a sniper to fire on the guy to keep him ducking as door entry was done. Yes, that could have been dangerous if there was not direct communication between the sniper and the entry unit, but that is the way things are done by pros. Which may explain why, I heard that the team waited 24 minutes before storming the door. But I admit this is armchair analysis on sketchy info.



posted on Oct, 24 2017 @ 08:33 PM
link   
The SWAT dident breach Paddocks room before 70+ minutes after the shooting started?

Paddocks stoppes shooting after 11 or 12 min. What did Paddocks do for about 60 min?

Have a coffibreak??

No....Paddocks was dead.



posted on Oct, 24 2017 @ 10:07 PM
link   
I never thought he killed himself, even BEFORE I saw the picture of him dead with a chest wound.



posted on Oct, 24 2017 @ 10:09 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen


I saw no bullet holes in the corpse's clothing.



posted on Oct, 24 2017 @ 10:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: KansasGirl
I never thought he killed himself, even BEFORE I saw the picture of him dead with a chest wound.


Why would the police want to hide that they killed Paddock? For religious reasons?



posted on Oct, 24 2017 @ 10:14 PM
link   
Sheriff Lombardo, IF he ever addresses this audio, will just say that an officer fired but didn't hit Paddock and that he was dead already...he will stick to the story.
edit on 24-10-2017 by KansasGirl because: Autocorrect. What else?




top topics



 
47
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join