It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

November 2004 off the coast of Calif. Nimitz Battle group and UFO

page: 1
16
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 23 2017 @ 01:57 AM
link   
Tonight George Knapp is on C2C talking about the encounter the USS Nimitz battle group had with what they are calling a Tic Tac UFO.. Evidently there is gun camera and infrared military video of the incident.. I am posting this for those who might want to follow up as this information is just being released today 10/23/2017



Date
Sunday - October 22, 2017
Host
George Knapp
Guests
Jeremy Corbell, Leslie Kean

On a sunny day in 2004 off the coast of San Diego, the USS Nimitz battle group encountered a technology beyond anything known on earth. It was a mystery aircraft shaped like a 46-foot long Tic Tac that hovered and maneuvered for hours and defied the F-18's sent to intercept (related report). UFO researcher Jeremy Corbell joins George Knapp to discuss how an investigation by the US Navy was hushed up and the only public mention was in a little known aviation magazine read by pilots. First hour guest, UFO researcher and author Leslie Kean talks about the Tom DeLonge announcement and involvement of a former DOD official. Related articles: one | two.

www.coasttocoastam.com...




posted on Oct, 23 2017 @ 02:18 AM
link   
more likely the news is published from mummies basement,

Or, otherwise similar to “black hawk down” you know, try to coverup an embarrassment.



edit on 23-10-2017 by Pandaram because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 23 2017 @ 04:41 AM
link   
a reply to: 727Sky

Following the info back here's a link to the original story referenced by C2C.

fightersweep.com...

The alleged Naval Document
drive.google.com...

C2C is using a post from FB as it's source, which is a FB group called Scientific Coalition for Ufology, they reposted the info based on a post at another FB group called Gavas Dot Com. The excerpt I included is from Gavas Dot Com and the name Jeremy Corbell was left out of the original FB post that C2C picked up.

www.facebook.com...



Of these three documents, the one that I find the strongest is the story by the naval aviator. The Navy Event Summary and the F-18 video support the story but more was needed. The question in my mind then became---could I support this information from another source. In December of 2016 I submitted nine FOIAs to various departments of the Navy and Marines to try and verify this event. In Part II of this series, I will share the information on the FOIAs that I submitted.
Jeremy Corbell


Since not everyone will go searching on FB I hauled the links an such here to make this easier. I have no clue who Corbell is but it would seem relevant? I also don't know how respected, if at all, Fighter Sweep is as a aero publication. Hoping some more knowledgeable people can shed some light on it?



posted on Oct, 23 2017 @ 04:50 AM
link   
OK it would seem JEREMY KENYON LOCKYER CORBELL is an investigative filmmaker, the same one who brought us the following film. IIRC there was a few threads here on ATS about it.

www.extraordinarybeliefs.com...#/anonymous-interview/



posted on Oct, 23 2017 @ 06:34 AM
link   
a reply to: 727Sky

But for the unofficial release of the video of this event, this whole affair would never see the light of day. Undoubtedly, there have been tens of thousands of such experiences witnessed by competent service personal and their equipment since the UFOs began their current siege during World War Two.

It must be one Hellofva shock to be flying or operating our best equipment and find that you are not even in the game.
Such is part of the hard-hitting drama that the whole world faces across all of its aspect be they civilian, military or government.

That the observed data is almost incomprehensible by current standards of thought and technology should be enough for sleepless nights of rethinking our position in the cosmos. And if you want to believe and pretend that your government knows nothing of ETI activity on our planet, then you haven't been paying attention, only accepting what you are told to believe.
edit on 23-10-2017 by Aliensun because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 23 2017 @ 07:02 AM
link   
a reply to: Caver78

The alleged Naval Document - is meant to look like a standard military signal format. But it's gibberish. Contained within the first few lines is ADEX which stands for Air Defence Exercise which clearly the report is not about. I didn't continue reading after that.



posted on Oct, 23 2017 @ 07:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: vonspurter
a reply to: Caver78

The alleged Naval Document - is meant to look like a standard military signal format. But it's gibberish. Contained within the first few lines is ADEX which stands for Air Defence Exercise which clearly the report is not about. I didn't continue reading after that.




We would appreciate your dissection of the entire piece to show that it made up entirely of whole cloth. Barring that from you I would have to call your dismissal as an attempt to deny the case in total which is SOP from those blindly skeptical or charged with a particular duty.



posted on Oct, 23 2017 @ 08:04 AM
link   
There is good information within the links and videos, and running a search on tic tac UFO leads to another George Knapp video clip that discusses most of the same things, but also a bit more. Obviously this is a case that has much more material to back it up as a true unknown technology that was pretty much putting on a display for US military forces, and it toyed with them as a show of extreme superiority, but was not hostile. It seems most of the aircraft during the encounter were not loaded out with any fire power at the time which is interesting when reflecting on what the unknown object was doing.



posted on Oct, 23 2017 @ 08:27 AM
link   
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

Need we ponder if it would have been wise to fire any weapon upon superior technology?
That they have been here for decades, at least, should be proof in itself that they are not here for lunch.
This thread is probably doomed to die from indifference for some strange reason by the usual aviation participants.



posted on Oct, 23 2017 @ 10:38 AM
link   
This allegedly highly classified UFO sighting was fully explained and detailed in some guy's blog that's been freely avaiable on the Internet for several years. Yeah, okay.



posted on Oct, 23 2017 @ 10:46 AM
link   
It's strange to see this get recycled back to ATS after all these years.

For the first discussion of the UFO
test.abovetopsecret.com...

And this post where the video was originally shared.
test.abovetopsecret.com...
Later in the second thread is the alleged document.



posted on Oct, 23 2017 @ 12:48 PM
link   
a reply to: CardDown

www.abovetopsecret.com...

You posted the test for some reason.

use the regular site.



posted on Oct, 23 2017 @ 03:13 PM
link   
Cornell was actually on Myterious Universe the other night talking about this. He was basically saying that one of the solid names in Tom Delonge's new group was leaking out the link to the website for a reason. Apparently this was the night of letting the public know what this new group was going to be about.

ReDing some of the responses it doesn't seem like it is all that unknown as it was being presented to be. For any MU listeners this was from the latest show plus edition.

Cornell has also just released a new documentary about Patient 17, for anyone interested



posted on Oct, 23 2017 @ 03:24 PM
link   
a reply to: vonspurter

I disagree. The ADEX is the exercise they were doing for workups. When I was planning CompTuEx's, we would use the formal designation of events (ADEX, BombEx, CAPEX, etc) on the air plan and for debriefs, as we were training the entire network, from Intel, to execution, to debriefing.

So, if this was JTFX or C2X, the ADEX code would be used. I don't think this invalidates the document at all.



posted on Oct, 23 2017 @ 04:07 PM
link   
Has anybody managed to download the actual video and can upload to YouTube? The Google drive is overloaded.



posted on Oct, 23 2017 @ 04:53 PM
link   
still waiting for Delonge to release the government footage, radar and infrared captures of this event as was promised..



posted on Oct, 23 2017 @ 05:25 PM
link   
a reply to: njord

Yes. It should be good. F18 with 2004 tech.

Would be kind of ironic, though, if it turns out to be the same video ATS mostly rejected ten years ago.
Now released "officially.

That's why I wanted to see the original one.



posted on Oct, 23 2017 @ 10:39 PM
link   


This was just uploaded today.

I never saw the originally posted vid, so can't say if it's the same one.
Looks like crappy CGI to me.



posted on Oct, 24 2017 @ 01:43 AM
link   
a reply to: Iridomyrmex

Thanks. Maybe someone else, who might have seen the one from the 2007 thread can chip in if it is the same.

We shall have to wait for the official video to compare, perhaps.



posted on Oct, 24 2017 @ 03:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: Iridomyrmex


This was just uploaded today.

I never saw the originally posted vid, so can't say if it's the same one.
Looks like crappy CGI to me.


How did you stumble across this....was it linked somewhere else or did you have it set up on YT alerts??



new topics

top topics



 
16
<<   2 >>

log in

join