It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

CRIMINAL Investigation Into OBAMA Admin Dealings With RUSSIA.

page: 5
86
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 22 2017 @ 10:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: TheScale

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
Wow! Crazy times indeed.

I remember asking some people who had worked on Obama's election campaigns as to why the Democrats during the 2016 election didn't highlight the Trump family ties to the mafia in NYC and related corruption? Immediate answer: "Because many Democrats are likely in bed with them too in NYC."


Ties to the U.S. Mafia might be acceptable to Democrats and Republicans. Democrats don't like investment banks and Wall Street, from what I gather.


Is that what you gather?... After Obama bailed out the big banks in 2008/2009?

After Obama and Clinton were paid b̶r̶i̶b̶e̶s̶ ̶ "speaking fees" for talks at banker events?


I take it that Bernie Sanders is not a "Real" Democrat then? He constantly consistently 100% bashes Wall Street, Investment Bakers, Big Pharmaceuticals, and a few other "BIG" entities.


i guess u missed the part when the democrats took bernies presidential run out back and shot it in the head. shows u what the democrats think of bernie


Bernie endorsed the anointed Obama replacement. He doesn't appear to be someone who is easily intimidated. But for the good of the party, he probably bit his upper lip and reluctantly gave Hillary his backing.


Bernie Sanders was an Independent for his entire political career until he ran for President and he’s gone back to being an Independent since.


But he endorsed Hillary Clinton for President.

Bet he voted that way too.



And?




posted on Oct, 22 2017 @ 10:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
Wow! Crazy times indeed.

I remember asking some people who had worked on Obama's election campaigns as to why the Democrats during the 2016 election didn't highlight the Trump family ties to the mafia in NYC and related corruption? Immediate answer: "Because many Democrats are likely in bed with them too in NYC."


Ties to the U.S. Mafia might be acceptable to Democrats and Republicans. Democrats don't like investment banks and Wall Street, from what I gather.


Is that what you gather?... After Obama bailed out the big banks in 2008/2009?

After Obama and Clinton were paid b̶r̶i̶b̶e̶s̶ ̶ "speaking fees" for talks at banker events?


Obama bailed out the banks in 2008?



posted on Oct, 22 2017 @ 10:12 PM
link   
The mines in question were already owned by a Canadian company.

The CFIUS had ten members; nothing was “decided” by Clinton.

The uranium mined was to be processed in Canada and brought back to the US; there is no hard evidence that anything else ever happened.

The US gets 83% of its uranium from other countries ... with almost 25% of that supply coming from Russia and Kazakhstan.

The US has for over 20 years exchanged ENRICHED uranium for Russian nuclear fuel from decommissioned warheads.

Uranium One sold 4 of the American mines in 2010 and five more in 2016.

Production in the remaining U1 mine has dropped over 94% in the last five years.

There is no there, there.
edit on 22-10-2017 by Gryphon66 because: noted



posted on Oct, 22 2017 @ 10:13 PM
link   

edit on 22-10-2017 by Gryphon66 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 22 2017 @ 10:29 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Oddly Fox buried this fact at the very bottom of their article and you seem to have ignored it altogether; I wonder why?



And PolitiFact found that most of the donations from individuals related to Uranium One and UrAsia Energy were made before and during Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign — before she became secretary of state.



posted on Oct, 22 2017 @ 10:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
Wow! Crazy times indeed.

I remember asking some people who had worked on Obama's election campaigns as to why the Democrats during the 2016 election didn't highlight the Trump family ties to the mafia in NYC and related corruption? Immediate answer: "Because many Democrats are likely in bed with them too in NYC."


Ties to the U.S. Mafia might be acceptable to Democrats and Republicans. Democrats don't like investment banks and Wall Street, from what I gather.


Is that what you gather?... After Obama bailed out the big banks in 2008/2009?

After Obama and Clinton were paid b̶r̶i̶b̶e̶s̶ ̶ "speaking fees" for talks at banker events?


Obama bailed out the banks in 2008?


Sorry, Bush.You're right. At the same time, Obama continued many wall street friendly policies, and filled his administration with wall street henchmen.

Also, for a *real* leftist critique of Obama from actual commies, and on this subject:

www.icl-fi.org...
edit on 22-10-2017 by Quetzalcoatl14 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 22 2017 @ 10:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: TheScale

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
Wow! Crazy times indeed.

I remember asking some people who had worked on Obama's election campaigns as to why the Democrats during the 2016 election didn't highlight the Trump family ties to the mafia in NYC and related corruption? Immediate answer: "Because many Democrats are likely in bed with them too in NYC."


Ties to the U.S. Mafia might be acceptable to Democrats and Republicans. Democrats don't like investment banks and Wall Street, from what I gather.


Is that what you gather?... After Obama bailed out the big banks in 2008/2009?

After Obama and Clinton were paid b̶r̶i̶b̶e̶s̶ ̶ "speaking fees" for talks at banker events?


I take it that Bernie Sanders is not a "Real" Democrat then? He constantly consistently 100% bashes Wall Street, Investment Bakers, Big Pharmaceuticals, and a few other "BIG" entities.


i guess u missed the part when the democrats took bernies presidential run out back and shot it in the head. shows u what the democrats think of bernie


Bernie endorsed the anointed Obama replacement. He doesn't appear to be someone who is easily intimidated. But for the good of the party, he probably bit his upper lip and reluctantly gave Hillary his backing.


Bernie Sanders was an Independent for his entire political career until he ran for President and he’s gone back to being an Independent since.


I see. Thanks for that info. I mistakenly thought he was/is a Democrat. In that case, Hillary shouldn't have had so much influence over him.


Influence? He seems to have thought, like most Americans who voted, that someone else besdies Trump would make a better President. He seems to have been Thinking pretty clearly, based on what we’ve seen.


Yeah..a minority of "deplorable" Americans are why Republicans picked up a majority in the House/Senate/WhiteHouse over the past 8 years.



posted on Oct, 22 2017 @ 10:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: TheScale

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
Wow! Crazy times indeed.

I remember asking some people who had worked on Obama's election campaigns as to why the Democrats during the 2016 election didn't highlight the Trump family ties to the mafia in NYC and related corruption? Immediate answer: "Because many Democrats are likely in bed with them too in NYC."


Ties to the U.S. Mafia might be acceptable to Democrats and Republicans. Democrats don't like investment banks and Wall Street, from what I gather.


Is that what you gather?... After Obama bailed out the big banks in 2008/2009?

After Obama and Clinton were paid b̶r̶i̶b̶e̶s̶ ̶ "speaking fees" for talks at banker events?


I take it that Bernie Sanders is not a "Real" Democrat then? He constantly consistently 100% bashes Wall Street, Investment Bakers, Big Pharmaceuticals, and a few other "BIG" entities.


i guess u missed the part when the democrats took bernies presidential run out back and shot it in the head. shows u what the democrats think of bernie


Bernie endorsed the anointed Obama replacement. He doesn't appear to be someone who is easily intimidated. But for the good of the party, he probably bit his upper lip and reluctantly gave Hillary his backing.


Bernie Sanders was an Independent for his entire political career until he ran for President and he’s gone back to being an Independent since.


I see. Thanks for that info. I mistakenly thought he was/is a Democrat. In that case, Hillary shouldn't have had so much influence over him.


Influence? He seems to have thought, like most Americans who voted, that someone else besdies Trump would make a better President. He seems to have been Thinking pretty clearly, based on what we’ve seen.


Yeah..a minority of "deplorable" Americans are why Republicans picked up a majority in the House/Senate/WhiteHouse over the past 8 years.


Nope that would be gerrymandering in the House . see more here REDMAP



posted on Oct, 22 2017 @ 10:36 PM
link   
LIBERAL MEDIA ALREADY COMING TO THE CLINTON's RESCUE! (They Hope!)

As Hillary Clinton was beginning her job as President Obama’s chief diplomat, federal agents observed as multiple arms of Vladimir Putin’s machine unleashed an influence campaign designed to win access to the new secretary of State, her husband Bill Clinton and members of their inner circle, according to interviews and once-sealed FBI records.

Hillary The Victim: thehill.com...

edit on 10/22/2017 by carewemust because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 22 2017 @ 10:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14

originally posted by: Irishhaf
Bread and circuses... From both parties.

Nobody of note is going to jail, some peon will be tossed in jail/suicided congress will say see we are not corrupt and business will continue as usual.


My usual reaction too to things like this. I'm grown fairly skeptical of the potential for that level of politicians or leaders to be held accountable.


You may be right. I was amazed when President Trump said after being elected that "Hillary had suffered enough". What happened to "Lock Her Up!" ??


Right, it's just like Bush Jr. was never held accountable for torture or the war in Iraq. It's a shared code of omerta, or non-prosecution.


I'm not sure what we accomplished with the Iraq War...if it was worth the many U.S. deaths. People were pretty adamant that Vietnam was a "bad" war. What about Iraq...same?

Torture is worthwhile in certain cases.


The Iraq War was an illegal act of aggression based on lies, and resulted not just in the deaths of thousands of Americans but hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians. It led to the rise of ISIS and instability generally in the ME.

Torture is known to not procure good intelligence, and even intelligence agencies and researchers confirm this. Further, it is a war crime.
Bush and Co. are literal war criminals, and should be behind bars.
edit on 22-10-2017 by Quetzalcoatl14 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 22 2017 @ 10:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: TheScale

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
Wow! Crazy times indeed.

I remember asking some people who had worked on Obama's election campaigns as to why the Democrats during the 2016 election didn't highlight the Trump family ties to the mafia in NYC and related corruption? Immediate answer: "Because many Democrats are likely in bed with them too in NYC."


Ties to the U.S. Mafia might be acceptable to Democrats and Republicans. Democrats don't like investment banks and Wall Street, from what I gather.


Is that what you gather?... After Obama bailed out the big banks in 2008/2009?

After Obama and Clinton were paid b̶r̶i̶b̶e̶s̶ ̶ "speaking fees" for talks at banker events?


I take it that Bernie Sanders is not a "Real" Democrat then? He constantly consistently 100% bashes Wall Street, Investment Bakers, Big Pharmaceuticals, and a few other "BIG" entities.


i guess u missed the part when the democrats took bernies presidential run out back and shot it in the head. shows u what the democrats think of bernie


Bernie endorsed the anointed Obama replacement. He doesn't appear to be someone who is easily intimidated. But for the good of the party, he probably bit his upper lip and reluctantly gave Hillary his backing.


Bernie Sanders was an Independent for his entire political career until he ran for President and he’s gone back to being an Independent since.


I see. Thanks for that info. I mistakenly thought he was/is a Democrat. In that case, Hillary shouldn't have had so much influence over him.


Influence? He seems to have thought, like most Americans who voted, that someone else besdies Trump would make a better President. He seems to have been Thinking pretty clearly, based on what we’ve seen.


Yeah..a minority of "deplorable" Americans are why Republicans picked up a majority in the House/Senate/WhiteHouse over the past 8 years.


Nope that would be gerrymandering in the House . see more here REDMAP


Looks like that page is describing a Republican STRATEGY that worked. OK....



posted on Oct, 22 2017 @ 10:38 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Hey, while we’re talking about Hillary ... weren’t most of those donations you are crowing about made before she became Secretary of State? That’s in your Fox article...



posted on Oct, 22 2017 @ 10:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: TheScale

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
Wow! Crazy times indeed.

I remember asking some people who had worked on Obama's election campaigns as to why the Democrats during the 2016 election didn't highlight the Trump family ties to the mafia in NYC and related corruption? Immediate answer: "Because many Democrats are likely in bed with them too in NYC."


Ties to the U.S. Mafia might be acceptable to Democrats and Republicans. Democrats don't like investment banks and Wall Street, from what I gather.


Is that what you gather?... After Obama bailed out the big banks in 2008/2009?

After Obama and Clinton were paid b̶r̶i̶b̶e̶s̶ ̶ "speaking fees" for talks at banker events?


I take it that Bernie Sanders is not a "Real" Democrat then? He constantly consistently 100% bashes Wall Street, Investment Bakers, Big Pharmaceuticals, and a few other "BIG" entities.


i guess u missed the part when the democrats took bernies presidential run out back and shot it in the head. shows u what the democrats think of bernie


Bernie endorsed the anointed Obama replacement. He doesn't appear to be someone who is easily intimidated. But for the good of the party, he probably bit his upper lip and reluctantly gave Hillary his backing.


Bernie Sanders was an Independent for his entire political career until he ran for President and he’s gone back to being an Independent since.


I see. Thanks for that info. I mistakenly thought he was/is a Democrat. In that case, Hillary shouldn't have had so much influence over him.


Influence? He seems to have thought, like most Americans who voted, that someone else besdies Trump would make a better President. He seems to have been Thinking pretty clearly, based on what we’ve seen.


Yeah..a minority of "deplorable" Americans are why Republicans picked up a majority in the House/Senate/WhiteHouse over the past 8 years.


Nope that would be gerrymandering in the House . see more here REDMAP


Looks like that page is describing a Republican STRATEGY that worked. OK....


Yep a strategy to gerrymander districts across the country..



posted on Oct, 22 2017 @ 10:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
Wow! Crazy times indeed.

I remember asking some people who had worked on Obama's election campaigns as to why the Democrats during the 2016 election didn't highlight the Trump family ties to the mafia in NYC and related corruption? Immediate answer: "Because many Democrats are likely in bed with them too in NYC."


Ties to the U.S. Mafia might be acceptable to Democrats and Republicans. Democrats don't like investment banks and Wall Street, from what I gather.


Is that what you gather?... After Obama bailed out the big banks in 2008/2009?

After Obama and Clinton were paid b̶r̶i̶b̶e̶s̶ ̶ "speaking fees" for talks at banker events?


I take it that Bernie Sanders is not a "Real" Democrat then? He constantly consistently 100% bashes Wall Street, Investment Bakers, Big Pharmaceuticals, and a few other "BIG" entities.


Lol, he is an independent, as even the Democrats state constantly. He has been for the majority of his career. He is one of the few real leftists left in the US, i.e. democratic socialist. Yes, HE is anti-wall street. But this is what he criticizes our political system for, corruption between government and corporate powers, and policies that only help the rich. This is one reason many of us believe they sidelined him during this past election cycle. The corrupt establishment wouldn't allow such a person into the oval office.



posted on Oct, 22 2017 @ 10:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
LIBERAL MEDIA ALREADY COMING TO THE CLINTON's RESCUE! (They Hope!)

As Hillary Clinton was beginning her job as President Obama’s chief diplomat, federal agents observed as multiple arms of Vladimir Putin’s machine unleashed an influence campaign designed to win access to the new secretary of State, her husband Bill Clinton and members of their inner circle, according to interviews and once-sealed FBI records.

Hillary The Victim: thehill.com...


You seem confused ... The Hill is the source of these fake Uranium One stories ...



posted on Oct, 22 2017 @ 10:42 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

The Hill isn't the "liberal media" it's not even a liberal media outlet. In fact, they're the ones who published the story about Vadim Mikerin that kicked off this current flurry of hope and distraction for Trump fans.



posted on Oct, 22 2017 @ 10:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: carewemust

Hey, while we’re talking about Hillary ... weren’t most of those donations you are crowing about made before she became Secretary of State? That’s in your Fox article...


If it's in the article, why did you phrase it as a question? Anway, I'm going to stay focused on the Obama Admin/Uranium One investigation. You can discuss these side issues with others.



posted on Oct, 22 2017 @ 10:46 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

My eyes tells me that it is...on a daily basis: www.TheHill.com Go have a look. Most stories are negative Republican and/or Trump.



posted on Oct, 22 2017 @ 10:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: carewemust

Not unexpected and nothing really new here, except that the FBI informant is talking.

Also, I don't believe the FBI uncovered a bribery scheme. They helped facilitate it, if I remember correctly.


This is one piece of a more complicated matter. I heard yesterday that Bill Clinton met with Russians to facilitate "something" for his wife, Secretary of State Hillary.


We "hear" a lot of things. Though, I thought the "facilitation" went to the CF and not to Hillary, or her campaign, directly.

If the latter is true, things become more complicated and difficult.


The Clinton Foundation did rake in $2 Billion dollars. A lot of $$$.
en.wikipedia.org...

As the investigations get underway in earnest, we'll learn more. This "matter" has real people/real meetings/real paper-trails. Not going to be Witch-Hunt II.


Forgive me if I do not hold my breath.

We've been down this road before. We know how easily Right Wing conspiracies go mainstream and turn in to nothing more than a steaming pile of bull#, which is then capitalized on by those smart enough to sell books on the subject to idiots that wish for all the conspiracies to be true.

Case and point: Benghazi...



posted on Oct, 22 2017 @ 10:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: carewemust

Hey, while we’re talking about Hillary ... weren’t most of those donations you are crowing about made before she became Secretary of State? That’s in your Fox article...


If it's in the article, why did you phrase it as a question? Anway, I'm going to stay focused on the Obama Admin/Uranium One investigation. You can discuss these side issues with others.


LOL ... it's not a side note it's from the article you cited. It effectively puts the lie to the silly allegations that Russians bribed Clinton (or anyone) to "sell" uranium when she had just lost the nomination to Obama.

... but you do you, boo.



new topics

top topics



 
86
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join