It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Transgender Person On Trial For Sexually Assaulting 10-Year-Old Girl In Bathroom

page: 10
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in


posted on Oct, 20 2017 @ 01:44 AM
I swear, it takes a special kind of depravity to do something like that to a kid.

If any of you are fathers (or Mothers!), and some depraved nutjob did something like this to YOUR kid, in YOUR bathroom, in YOUR house, what would be odds that this sick, twisted @#%$ would ever leave your place alive?

You know that scene in "The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo" where Lizbeth takes revenge on the social worker guy that raped her? Personally, that might be my #1 go-to option. It would save the State a LOT of money, too, so hey, BONUS!

originally posted by: Kandinsky
a reply to: seasonal

A lot of ATSers see the bathrooms as the problem when it's really a sexual predator problem. It's like banning public parks because of the high rates of rapes and muggings.

The rapists and muggers will still exist whether there are parks or not.

I also see it that way. And, of course, it would have to be California, wouldn't it? Haha!

My grandfather, who passed a few years back, was a Marine in the Pacific Island-hopping campaign during WWII. I remember one time we were talking, and somehow California came up in the conversation, and he referred to it as " The land of fruits and nuts, where men are men, and so are a lot of the women". Damn, I miss that old man.

Oh, and on the outside chance that there are any Californians on ATS, and that statement offends you, Ummm.. I don't care. Hopefully someday you'll be all growed up, and will make enough money to buy yourself a sense of humor.

posted on Oct, 20 2017 @ 01:55 AM

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: theantediluvian

I just want to point out that you got misled by the OP. This has nothing to do with legislation. The trans person (who hasn't been convicted we should keep in mind) was a family friend and that the sexual assault allegedly occurred in a bathroom at a private residence.

So was the person really transgender....

Do true transgender still have heterosexual tendencies? I'm really asking this question, not to troll.

Yes. I have a fee Trans friends in various transitions, some have had the Op, some haven't, some will, some won't and one only dresses in female attire every so often. To be fair, most of them are bi (though are with women more often than men. Two of my friends who have had the op are lesbians now. Hope that answers your question.

I hope everyone reading this thread realises now that, not only did this happen in a private residence (so it's not got the tiniest thing to do with Trans People using a certain bathroom, this is about who that family let into their home.

Would you all be less offended if this was a hetero male that was accused of this? Some of you would....

posted on Oct, 20 2017 @ 02:01 AM

originally posted by: MteWamp
If any of you are fathers (or Mothers!), and some depraved nutjob did something like this to YOUR kid, in YOUR bathroom, in YOUR house, what would be odds that this sick, twisted @#%$ would ever leave your place alive?

First of all, I don't let anyone in my family home that I don't trust with my kids. There's only a handful.of people fall into that category. I'm lucky enough to have a man-pad too, if I need to entertain or invite people round I don't trust to that level.

If, somehow, the unspeakable happened, the sick individual would find a knife across his dangley bits, his face would be a bloody pulp and there would be broken bones. He'd be alive though, I'd hand him over to the police myself and own up to my actions

posted on Oct, 20 2017 @ 05:24 AM
With this incident, the right can now claim victory regarding Transgenders. I find it so hypocritical when they use one or a few instances to bolster their argument for an all out transgender (or other topics) bathroom ban but bring up one gun or a few gun owners regarding mass shooting and they cry, it was a random event and all gun owners should not suffer the idiot.

They would be right of course, you cannot blame all gun owners for the few idiots but the same should be said about transgenders. You do realize they have been using the bathroom, they identify with for years and only became and issue when some conservative brought it up.

1. Children are rarely in the bathroom without a parent.
2. Most Transgenders are no pedo's.
3. Imagining a transgender molesting a child says more about your own sexual deviance, than about how moral you think are.

posted on Oct, 20 2017 @ 05:34 AM

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

These "bathroom inclusive laws" are only giving all sorts of male perverts an excuse to be get into women's bathrooms.

What was to prevent them from doing so before those "bathroom inclusive laws?"

We need laws to prevent priests from going to the public bathrooms.

But it's not all priests though, so it's ok.

It's all transgendered people though, and therefore not ok.

Religious nut logic eh?

posted on Oct, 20 2017 @ 05:36 AM
a reply to: jacquesdarippa

I hate to be another person telling you to read the article or that the OP missed the mark, but here goes.

This piece of garbage was a family friend that allegedly raped (guarantee did) the girl in the family's home. Private bathroom in a private residence.

Love my guns, uncomfortable around transgender folks, completely agree with you. This was a sick individual. That's it. Take the transgender out of the story, because it doesn't matter. I can't think of a single group of people (OK large group of people) that doesn't have some disgusting jackasses sneaking in and using that position to commit horrible acts.

posted on Oct, 20 2017 @ 05:40 AM
a reply to: mOjOm

So why are you jumping my ass about it pointing it out to the other member?

He's annoyed that someone read beyond the opening post!

Who does that?!

posted on Oct, 20 2017 @ 05:58 AM
What does being transgender have to do with this case?

Private bathroom in a private residence.

What about all of the straight men who assault children in the bathrooms of houses? Are we also supposed to ban straight men from toilets too?

Nobody is disagreeing that the child molester should go to jail for a long long time. But dragging the trans part into this story is pretty disgusting because of how irrelevant it is.

posted on Oct, 20 2017 @ 06:36 AM
a reply to: AbyshaHe never gets out of prison....until the day HE has his member removed......he will remain a HE/HIM. Until then he's just a man in a dress. Same goes for BRUCE JENNER & BRADLEY MANNING.

posted on Oct, 20 2017 @ 06:43 AM
a reply to: ElectricUniverse


Are you serious, posting this story with the obvious implications made by the title?

This was an incident which occurred in a residential bathroom, not a public one, therefore this has NOTHING at all to do, with the law in public bathrooms. Its just thinly veiled propaganda, is what this nonsense is. Absolutely disgusting to try and link this situation with the bathroom laws protecting transgender peoples rights in public toilets.

posted on Oct, 20 2017 @ 07:00 AM
a reply to: jacquesdarippa

This isn’t that...

This happened in a residential bathroom at the little girls house, and the perpetrator was a family friend...

It is blantant disgusting propaganda for them to pretend this applies to the PUBLIC bathroom law...

WHAT?!?! Are we going man ban trans people from residential bathrooms,!?! Lol

posted on Oct, 20 2017 @ 07:01 AM
a reply to: TrueBrit

Maybe he is saying we should ban transgenders from all bathrooms????

Or maybe this is just disgustingly blantant propaganda...

posted on Oct, 20 2017 @ 07:03 AM
a reply to: Painterz

Blantant and disgusting propaganda, maybe??

Lol.. this should be in the hoax forum..

posted on Oct, 20 2017 @ 07:06 AM
a reply to: Domo1


Take transgender out of the heardline?!?!

Then how is he supposed to push his blantantly disgusting propaganda?!?!

Lol.... this wasn’t an accident. The OP and source are blantantly lying to people for the soul purpose of deamonizibg people who had nothing to do with it...

posted on Oct, 20 2017 @ 07:07 AM
a reply to: TrueBrit

If it happened with a transgender as they want to be called & a bathroom. Then the title is correct. Confused man molested GIRL in bathroom. We are going freaking over board with this transgendered B.S. and Bull shat is exactly what it is. Until these transgendered/confused men have their manhood looped off then their just a damn man dressed as a woman. Period the end. Theirs no gray area here, your either a man or a woman, you don't get to be both by choice. Legally changing your name to a woman's name does not make you a woman, it makes you a man dressed like a woman using a woman's name.
edit on 20-10-2017 by openyourmind1262 because: (no reason given)

posted on Oct, 20 2017 @ 07:08 AM
a reply to: MteWamp

What would be the odds I pretend this happened in a public bathroom to try and make a false equivalency with all trans people and the bathroom law????

Would that make me just a disgusting human being?? Nor as disgusting as the pedo... but disgusting none the less...

posted on Oct, 20 2017 @ 07:12 AM
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

What does this story have to do with any of that, beside your desire to push just horribly disgusting propaganda????

I doubt you are getting paid for it...

So what??? Not enough hugs from mommy as a kid???

Secretly trans or gay and hate yourself??

Maybe your spouse is secretly gay or was turned gay???

This kind of purposeful deception has got to have some deep seeded root cause...

posted on Oct, 20 2017 @ 07:14 AM
10 pages in and everyone is ignoring the rights of the bathroom. Did anyone ask if the bathroom in the private residence identifies as a public bathroom?

That was my attempt at humor.
I know, I know...poor taste.

But in all seriousness, with this being a private residence, I do not see the transgender aspect being relevant in THIS argument.

But i do have something to say about this bathroom bullsh!t.

My local university has taken it upon themselves to change every "single serve" restroom to be unisex. In general, I am ok with this. The issue I have is the fact that many restrooms that are single seater's were MEN'S restrooms. Now they are mostly being occupied by women who prefer the solitary restroom experience.
Certain building have no designated Men's restrooms on the majority of floors now. When the unisex is being occupied (mostly by women), you have to go to another floor to relieve yourself.
On a daily basis, you can see men lined up waiting on the restroom between classes.

They also removed the dedicated Veteran's parking area (located in front of the Student Veteran's offices and banned nicotine of ALL types including vaping, even while sitting in your personal vehicle. The joys of a PC campus.

But anyway, back to the OP.

I think bathrooms should be segregated by genitalia. Penis's in one, vagina's in the other one. If you have both, your choice. I don't care how a person identifies themselves. If we have to consider that, then we will need 17 bathrooms to cater to all the people who need special treatment.

I mean, when you go to a restaurant, will they give you a drink menu, a dinner menu and bathroom menu?

" I will have a light beer, caesar salad, steak and baked potato. I will be finishing with the restroom for confused middle-aged men. No wait, I'm feeling like a prepubescent, immigrant who'll just use the potted plant in the corner."

Anyways, It is a tough subject.

posted on Oct, 20 2017 @ 07:38 AM

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: JoshuaCox

Propaganda piece?... not really... What makes you think that this couldn't happen or hasn't happened in other cases in public restrooms?... Because it has happened.

It's from the Daily Caller and is such a clichéd story that ticks all the rabid scaremongering boxes; it's obviously not going to check out.

posted on Oct, 20 2017 @ 07:47 AM

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: JoshuaCox

Yep, it took place in the bathroom the girl's family apartment and the perp was a family friend. So, this has nothing to do with Target, or Trans bathroom rights.

The perp is also a transgender who identifies as a woman, so yes it does have a lot to do with public bathrooms because if this hadn't happened in a private bathroom it could have happened in a public bathroom,

It happened in a private bathroom in a private home, not a public bathroom. Your point is therefore irreverent. Assault is assault.

But the OP has had her confirmation bias satisfied and is free to troll the interwebz for more bad behaviour that makes her sound as if she is right. A day well spent.

top topics

<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in