It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Edumakated
I don't support it. Law enforcement either needs to prove someone is doing something illegally or step the fk off. I don't get how this has not been challenged and shot down. It is literally guilty until proven innocent.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Wayfarer
Civil Asset Forfeiture is a Constitutional violation as it violates the 4th Amendment. Anyone in favor of Civil Asset Forfeiture should be kicked out of the country for being unpatriotic.
Seems it's a net positive to the agencies that are seizing property.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Wayfarer
"Net positive", for whom?
Seizure of private property without due process beforehand is a direct violation of the 4th ammendment.
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
I find it odd that it needs to be shown it's profit motivated. This reeks of illegal search and seizure which, I would think, is admissible grounds itself.
“The court’s ruling pointed to numerous specific pieces of evidence offered in Ms. Cox’s lawsuit that show the unconstitutional profit motive inherent in Arizona’s forfeiture laws – a motive that has long corrupted the work of law enforcement in our state," said Jean-Jacques Cabou, a partner at Perkins Coie in Phoenix. "We’re confident that our upcoming discovery will reveal even more about these unconstitutional laws and the practice of policing for profit in Arizona.”
Nice idea but slippery slopes usually don't allow sliding up hill. The little guy gets the shaft because it's easier.
originally posted by: RoScoLaz5
"to seize property and money on suspicion of its connection with criminal wrongdoing."
on that basis, seize the whitehouse, capitol hill, wall street, etc etc
DEA units assigned to patrol 15 of the nation’s busiest airports seized more than $209 million in cash from at least 5,200 people over the past decade after concluding the money was linked to drug trafficking, according to Justice Department records. Most of the money was passed on to local police departments that lend officers to assist the drug agency.
“They count on this as part of the budget,” said Louis Weiss, a former supervisor of the DEA group assigned to Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport. “Basically, you’ve got to feed the monster.”
In most cases, records show the agents gave the suspected couriers a receipt for the cash — sometimes totaling $50,000 or more, stuffed into suitcases or socks — and sent them on their way without ever charging them with a crime.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Aazadan
That is a stupid loop hole. Civil Asset forfeiture ruins innocent people's lives. It isn't fair and is totally authoritarian. Like I said, I don't support it one iota.