It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

FBI uncovered Russian bribery plot before Obama admin approved nuclear deal with Moscow

page: 20
141
<< 17  18  19    21  22  23 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 12:28 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66




You might sound more convincing if you brought facts to the table rather than silly pejoratives.
Oh so now I have to talk like you and comment like you ...I don't want to be like you ...I exercise my free speech on the internet to read ,think ,and speak as I see fit . I guess you are the one that has a problem with that ,not me




posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 12:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: Gryphon66




You might sound more convincing if you brought facts to the table rather than silly pejoratives.
Oh so now I have to talk like you and comment like you ...I don't want to be like you ...I exercise my free speech on the internet to read ,think ,and speak as I see fit . I guess you are the one that has a problem with that ,not me


Heck no! Don't talk like me, tends to irritate folks that are attempting to prevaricate and mislead.

So, do you have any facts to offer us? Or just more belief-based opinions?



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 12:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: spiritualzombie

Now now, don't turn their own conflicted logic back on them ... they may implode.


Hahaha!

You guys are too much!

So now you erect the straw man that the fbi is always lying and therefore this must be a hoax.

Sweet. Then clearly you have no problem into a special investigator hiring a bunch of trump donors looking into all of this, and the hillary email scandal.

Great to have you on board!


Speaking of straw men ... can you quote me saying any of that garbage?


Yes I can.

You commented on spirutualzombie sayin everything from the fbi was a hoax saying to to turn logic around.



Man, you still haven’t helped me understand why you’re bringing FBI nonsense into this? I’m ready to get on the Trump Train I just don’t want to be one of those dumb supporter types who pick and choose without any real reason or logic.

So why this FBI thread is okay, but when it’s FBI and entire Intelligence Community saying Russia interfered that’s a hoax and fake news.

I just don’t want to look like a dumb Trump supporter to my friends, so please help.



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 12:45 PM
link   
a reply to: butcherguy

You mean the same FBI that cleared Clinton months before interviewing her?

No bias at all.



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 12:46 PM
link   
Hate to further rain on y'all's parade today, but little Jeff Sessions didn't make that good an impression in front of the Senate today. Something about not answering many/any questions because of "Executive Privilege" ...

Hard for the Senate to provide Constitutional oversight on a secretive Executive Branch, huh?

This reminds me of something though ... Nixon maybe?
edit on 18-10-2017 by Gryphon66 because: Noted



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 12:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: butcherguy

You mean the same FBI that cleared Clinton months before interviewing her?

No bias at all.


Nah. They didn't clear her ... Comey had reviewed the actual evidence and prepared for the inevitable outcome.



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 01:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Hate to further rain on y'all's parade today, but little Jeff Sessions didn't make that good an impression in front of the Senate today. Something about not answering many/any questions because of "Executive Privilege" ...

Hard for the Senate to provide Constitutional oversight on a secretive Executive Branch, huh?

This reminds me of something though ... Nixon maybe?


How about Lynch? Why not count the times, there's a good fella. Does it beat 74 refusals?



Yep, whataboutery works both ways.




posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 01:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Hate to further rain on y'all's parade today, but little Jeff Sessions didn't make that good an impression in front of the Senate today. Something about not answering many/any questions because of "Executive Privilege" ...

Hard for the Senate to provide Constitutional oversight on a secretive Executive Branch, huh?

This reminds me of something though ... Nixon maybe?


Huh. How many in the Obama admin pleaded the 5th for various misdeeds?

Too bad this isn't the mudpit.



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 01:42 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66




So, do you have any facts to offer us? Or just more belief-based opinions?
If by facts you mean online links to places like Snoops that provide opinions to questions then no ...do you ?



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 01:45 PM
link   
a reply to: Jonjonj

Fusion GPS officials take the Fifth in Trump dossier interview on Capitol Hill www.foxnews.com...



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 01:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian

Did Donald Trump Jr. agree to take a meeting under the premise that he would be receiving material directly from the Kremlin


Still hoping you can shed some light on this comment. It's a pretty bold accusation, and without something to back it up, makes you look a bit desperate.



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 01:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: butcherguy

You mean the same FBI that cleared Clinton months before interviewing her?

No bias at all.


Nah. They didn't clear her ... Comey had reviewed the actual evidence and prepared for the inevitable outcome.


long before she was even interviewed. Right. tow that line sister. tow that line.



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 01:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: Gryphon66




So, do you have any facts to offer us? Or just more belief-based opinions?
If by facts you mean online links to places like Snoops that provide opinions to questions then no ...do you ?


The Snopes article I cited had clear references. Next?



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 01:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: butcherguy

You mean the same FBI that cleared Clinton months before interviewing her?

No bias at all.


Nah. They didn't clear her ... Comey had reviewed the actual evidence and prepared for the inevitable outcome.


long before she was even interviewed. Right. tow that line sister. tow that line.


The facts about the servers and the email on them were known at the time. Can you dispute that?



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 01:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Wardaddy454

Who plead the Fifth?

That has zero to do with my post.



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 02:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Jonjonj

How many times did she claim Executive Priviledge again?



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 02:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Jonjonj

How many times did she claim Executive Priviledge again?

She didn't need to...
She flat out lied.
She is not too proud to lie.



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 02:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Jonjonj

How many times did she claim Executive Priviledge again?

She didn't need to...
She flat out lied.
She is not too proud to lie.


Thanks for more of your opinion.

That has nothing to do with the comment I made.



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 02:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Jonjonj

How many times did she claim Executive Priviledge again?

She didn't need to...
She flat out lied.
She is not too proud to lie.


Thanks for more of your opinion.

That has nothing to do with the comment I made.

You are welcome.



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 02:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: theantediluvian

Did Donald Trump Jr. agree to take a meeting under the premise that he would be receiving material directly from the Kremlin


Still hoping you can shed some light on this comment. It's a pretty bold accusation, and without something to back it up, makes you look a bit desperate.


Do you need to be reminded of the email?

Read the Emails on Donald Trump Jr.’s Russia Meeting


Good morning

Emin just called and asked me to contact you with something very interesting.

The Crown prosecutor of Russia met with his father Aras this morning and in their meeting offered to provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father.

This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government's support for Mr. Trump - helped along by Aras and Emin.

What do you think is the best way to handle this information and would you be able to speak to Emin about it directly?

I can also send this info to your father via Rhona, but it is ultra sensitive so wanted to send to you first.

Best

Rob Goldstone


What was Don Jr's response?


Thanks Rob I appreciate that. I am on the road at the moment but perhaps I just speak to Emin first. Seems we have some time and if it's what you say I love it especially later in the summer. Could we do a call first thing next week when I am back?

Best, Don


Keep reading the chain.


Don

Hope all is well

Emin asked that I schedule a meeting with you and The Russian government attorney who is flying over from Moscow for this Thursday.

I believe you are aware of the meeting - and so wondered if 3pm or later on Thursday works for you?

I assume it would be at your office.

Best

Rob Goldstone


To which Don Jr responded?


How about 3 at our offices? Thanks rob appreciate you helping set it up.

D


In what alternate fact universe can you spin that to be anything but exactly what I said?




top topics



 
141
<< 17  18  19    21  22  23 >>

log in

join