FBI uncovered Russian bribery plot before Obama admin approved nuclear deal with Moscow

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: spiritualzombie

Now now, don't turn their own conflicted logic back on them ... they may implode.

Hahaha!

You guys are too much!

So now you erect the straw man that the fbi is always lying and therefore this must be a hoax.

Sweet. Then clearly you have no problem into a special investigator hiring a bunch of trump donors looking into all of this, and the hillary email scandal.

Great to have you on board!

No man, I’m just legitimately trying to understand because I’ve been seeing the FBI/Russia fake news thing a lot, so i’m just trying to understand why the FBI isn’t fake news this time. I thought the FBI and entire Intelligence Community are fake news???? How am I suppose to show support if I don’t understand when to discard the FBI and when to believe??

I was always under the impression that the FBI is a law enforcement agency and their investigations are to be taken seriously, BUT I thought that changed some time
ago and that now FBI (especially on subject of Russia) are fake news and their findings are hoaxes and nonsense— just help me so I can show proper support. I don’t want to mess up and come off as a dumb Trump supporter. I want to be the smart Trump supporter with solid reason and logic.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: the2ofusr1

Snopes

Gosh, you guys are sounding a bit desperate ... are you really THAT afraid of what Mueller is going to find?

LOL...Snopes?

Almost as good as your request for a second source on a quote that was reported with named sources.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Sure, damn the source, avoid the facts.

Are you still sore about the Wichers spokesperson deal? Did you actually find any corroborating evidence for that?

Cause I gave you plenty that shows that if U1H is exporting anything, they're doing it illegally. Remember?

a reply to: Gryphon66

Gosh, you guys are sounding a bit desperate

Does the US have the ability to examine that kind of stuff ? I know that was the cover story back then but today is a new day with new details such as some documentation . Its still early to fit it all together but it sure rings bells .We shall see as it moves forward .

originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: Gryphon66

Gosh, you guys are sounding a bit desperate

Does the US have the ability to examine that kind of stuff ? I know that was the cover story back then but today is a new day with new details such as some documentation . Its still early to fit it all together but it sure rings bells .We shall see as it moves forward .

I'm really not sure of what you're trying to communicate in this vague group of sentences.

As I said above, Grassley's on the case ... let's see what the old boy roots out!

Which is absolutely NOTHING at this point.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: Gryphon66

Gosh, you guys are sounding a bit desperate

Does the US have the ability to examine that kind of stuff ? I know that was the cover story back then but today is a new day with new details such as some documentation . Its still early to fit it all together but it sure rings bells .We shall see as it moves forward .

I'm really not sure of what you're trying to communicate in this vague group of sentences.

As I said above, Grassley's on the case ... let's see what the old boy roots out!

Which is absolutely NOTHING at this point.

Sounds like Muller's results.

Watching Sessions in his appearance during the committee hearing, does anybody get the impression he is extremely unhappy with the way Comey handled the investigation into the Clinton email case?

I get that impression. Wonder what that might lead to in the future?

a reply to: spiritualzombie

The head of the Department of justice recused himself from the Russia investigation. Why?

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: Gryphon66

Gosh, you guys are sounding a bit desperate

Does the US have the ability to examine that kind of stuff ? I know that was the cover story back then but today is a new day with new details such as some documentation . Its still early to fit it all together but it sure rings bells .We shall see as it moves forward .

I'm really not sure of what you're trying to communicate in this vague group of sentences.

As I said above, Grassley's on the case ... let's see what the old boy roots out!

Which is absolutely NOTHING at this point.

Sounds like Muller's results.

I'm sure you hope that.

a reply to: Jonjonj

Hmmm ... well, if Jeff Sessions has time after trying to re-criminalize certain classes of drugs, I guess we'll see.

He seems to be busy trying to reverse States Rights and take away individual freedoms at the moment. Perhaps he can put a bad recommendation in Comey's file after that.

a reply to: the2ofusr1

You must acknowledge how incredibly unfortunate it is for democrats not having a Clinton administration in office that could have easily made all of this go away forever.

Once you have done that, simply sit back and enjoy the entertainment. We haven't even gotten to the best part yet. Get some popcorn!

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Jonjonj

Hmmm ... well, if Jeff Sessions has time after trying to re-criminalize certain classes of drugs, I guess we'll see.

He seems to be busy trying to reverse States Rights and take away individual freedoms at the moment. Perhaps he can put a bad recommendation in Comey's file after that.

So you agree, he is royally pissed off about it?

I thought so too.

originally posted by: Jonjonj

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Jonjonj

Hmmm ... well, if Jeff Sessions has time after trying to re-criminalize certain classes of drugs, I guess we'll see.

He seems to be busy trying to reverse States Rights and take away individual freedoms at the moment. Perhaps he can put a bad recommendation in Comey's file after that.

So you agree, he is royally pissed off about it?

I thought so too.

Who's upset, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions? Oh my.

Talk to me next week when Trump throws him under the bus again.

a reply to: ausername

Make what go away? The fact that the FBI has been investigating Russian corruption and attempts to undermine the US for years?

The silly connection to the nothing-burger served as "Uranium One"?

Enjoy that popcorn, mate: pickins otherwise are gonna be kinda slim.

originally posted by: ausername
a reply to: the2ofusr1

You must acknowledge how incredibly unfortunate it is for democrats not having a Clinton administration in office that could have easily made all of this go away forever.

Once you have done that, simply sit back and enjoy the entertainment. We haven't even gotten to the best part yet. Get some popcorn!

On the contrary, it must be delicious for the Democrats to watch the Republican Party implode over an unpopular insurgency. Clinton can sleep well knowing that she will not be blamed for America's allies abandoning it.

a reply to: ausername

Once you have done that, simply sit back and enjoy the entertainment. We haven't even gotten to the best part yet. Get some popcorn!

Its why I tagged the thread ..Two shows going on ..one is the spin doctors in the thread and the other is going to be the follow up response . They can't just sweep it under the carpet at this point and to defend it would them to expose other real nastier things . I guess Trump gave them all the rope they needed

a reply to: DJW001

On the contrary, it must be delicious for the Democrats to watch the Republican Party implode over an unpopular insurgency.

The only thing I could possibly enjoy alongside the Democrats is watching the Republican Party going down the same stink hole the Democrat Party went down . Thanks Hillary

a reply to: the2ofusr1

Hey, wouldn't this be such a nicer world if everyone just agreed with you all the time, huh?

Sadly, we don't.

The matter is put up for discussion. Shortcomings, errors and fallacies in the OP have been discussed, as well as with many posts trying to parrot that narrative.

You might sound more convincing if you brought facts to the table rather than silly pejoratives.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: spiritualzombie

Now now, don't turn their own conflicted logic back on them ... they may implode.

Hahaha!

You guys are too much!

So now you erect the straw man that the fbi is always lying and therefore this must be a hoax.

Sweet. Then clearly you have no problem into a special investigator hiring a bunch of trump donors looking into all of this, and the hillary email scandal.

Great to have you on board!

Speaking of straw men ... can you quote me saying any of that garbage?

Yes I can.

You commented on spirutualzombie sayin everything from the fbi was a hoax saying to to turn logic around.

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: spiritualzombie

Now now, don't turn their own conflicted logic back on them ... they may implode.

Hahaha!

You guys are too much!

So now you erect the straw man that the fbi is always lying and therefore this must be a hoax.

Sweet. Then clearly you have no problem into a special investigator hiring a bunch of trump donors looking into all of this, and the hillary email scandal.

Great to have you on board!

Speaking of straw men ... can you quote me saying any of that garbage?

Yes I can.

You commented on spirutualzombie sayin everything from the fbi was a hoax saying to to turn logic around.

Quote me.