It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

FBI uncovered Russian bribery plot before Obama admin approved nuclear deal with Moscow

page: 15
141
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 17 2017 @ 11:15 PM
link   
Dear ATS Readers, Writers,

Thanks Grambler for this post.

It just shows how badly that swamp needs draining, and more importantly... prosecuting any who are guilty.

This is also a part of the Oregon siege story, and assassination/murder of Levoy Finicum... because the land the government was trying to "grab", was also land that the government wanted to sell leases on for uranium mining..to the bloody Russians.

A lot of these things are tied together... and also might explain how horribly treated the siege prisoners/defendents are. Judges tossing out evidence, not allowing evidence, etc..for those who got arrested over the Oregon siege.

SO I am sure this will be not reported by MSM, buried, all is good, nothing to see with this revelation folks, move along, keep shopping too.

Yada, yada, yada... sigh.

Thanks for bringing this to the forum mate.

Pravdaseeker







a reply to: Grambler




posted on Oct, 17 2017 @ 11:22 PM
link   
a reply to: pravdaseeker

Fox is reporting it



posted on Oct, 17 2017 @ 11:24 PM
link   
Dear ATS Readers, Writers,

Well if "any" would, it would be Fox... the last tattered remnant of anything resembling true journalism these days.

Cool will watch the video you provided, and thanks for that.

Pravdaseeker


a reply to: the2ofusr1



posted on Oct, 17 2017 @ 11:34 PM
link   
While President Trump is donating his salary of $400,000 to charity, the Clintons rake in $145,000,000 selling favors. Notice how "regressives" always cast blame onto others for the very crimes they have committed?



posted on Oct, 17 2017 @ 11:37 PM
link   
a reply to: TruMcCarthy

ONLY the Republicans are not allowed to be friendly with the Russians. If the Left does it, it should be OK. Now I wonder if something major will come of it?



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 12:10 AM
link   
a reply to: knoxie

Pfft. If Trump is a Russian Stooge...how did our Intelligence Agencies not figure it out quicker? They should be investigated if Trump is a Russian plant, no?

Either they are wrong and Trump is not a Russian Stooge, then we question how they (IA) got that assessment Wrong or Trump is a Russian Stooge and our Intelligence Agencies failed to protect us. Either way they are showing some level of incompetence. You can't have it both ways.

Plus all the other issues (Hillary Emails and the late October letter, leaks, this Uranium stuff talked about in this thread and you paint a picture of an floundering organization that neither Democrats or Republicans can fully trust IMO. Who has oversight of the FBI?
edit on 18-10-2017 by pavil because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 01:45 AM
link   
If this is true it then something changed. Do you remember when Hillary changed and became very anti russian? Makes me wonder if someone didnt break a deal? Either the Russians were supposed to pay more or Hillary double crossed them. I guess if she did that mmay explain why they tried to support Trump. But let me say im still sceptical that this was a pay to play scam.If they were warned by the alphabet agencies of Russian bribes to take the money would be stupid.



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 03:27 AM
link   

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Grambler

Interesting...

So you are saying that Russians behaving like capitalists is bad?


You cant be that #ing stupid.



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 03:45 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

Nice, maybe finally we will see all of them in jail, or is that too much to ask?...

Where is Phage and all the other people who claimed "Obama/Hillary were not involved in the Russian/Uranium deal"... Perhaps the whole "Trump, and his advisors were in collusion with Russia" was to deflect the real collusion the DNC, and the Obama/Hillary administration had with the Russians...




edit on 18-10-2017 by ElectricUniverse because: correct comment.



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 04:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001

First, the "reset" with Russia. The Clinton administration needed to show some faith in the Putin administration. Second, America's uranium mining industry was in trouble.


Totally speculative and erroneous analysis. In 2010 Dimitri Medvedev was President of Russia.



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 04:27 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler>>>> I said that the Hillary camp was infamous for accusing their opponents of crimes they themselves were guilty of. Accuse Trump of being a sexual predator... the Clintons wrote the book on sexual predation. Accuse Trump of collusion with the Russians... they were literally in bed with Putin. Accuse Trump of voter fraud... they had every major media outlet except for Fox and Drudge working for them putting out anti Trump stories. Complain about fake news... those stories were actually true. Now you know why Trump has a legitimate case against the Obama administration, the DOJ and FBI, they were guilty of gross negligence, incompetence and corruption.



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 04:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: dragonridr
If this is true it then something changed. Do you remember when Hillary changed and became very anti russian? Makes me wonder if someone didnt break a deal? Either the Russians were supposed to pay more or Hillary double crossed them. I guess if she did that mmay explain why they tried to support Trump. But let me say im still sceptical that this was a pay to play scam.If they were warned by the alphabet agencies of Russian bribes to take the money would be stupid.
>>>> The Russians never tried to support Trump, they only willingly participated in a stage show to appear that they supported him and opposed Hillary. They wanted to draw attention away from their ties to the Clintons and I'm sure they would have continued that charade had Hillary won. Create a fake cold war that enriches the military weapons producers and we'd increase spending on intelligence agencies which would be used against the Clintons political enemies and not the Russians. Everything they've been saying is a lie. The russians didn't do squat to influence our election but took the blame willingly. Trump needs to start rounding up EVERYBODY in the DOJ, FBI and State Department under Obama and start criminal proceedings. Don't just drain the swamp, agent orange it and DDT it. And then drop a MOAB on it.



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 05:42 AM
link   
Dear ATS Readers, Writers,

Hi there GuidedKill; asked..



I'm really interested in hearing about anyone including republicans who have EVER done ANYTHING like this. This is selling Uranium to our enemy for profit!!

I HAVE NEVER HEARD OF ANYTHING LIKE THIS!!! PERIOD!!


Ah, I bet you have you just forgot about it.. I'll remind you of a couple I bet you knew about happening in the past.

There was that during WW2 Prescott Bush, W's grand pappy did business with Nazi's. Grand pappy Bush was still having some of his businesses taken away from him in 1950 as the US government was finally getting caught up on punishing those who did business with the Germans during WW2.

Over 150 Congress critter own own over 3.5 million bucks worth of Military Industrial Complex stock...

The 6 Most Popular Stocks In Congress



Get this: For the first time in history, more than half the members of Congress are millionaires . According to data from the Center for Responsive Politics -- a nonprofit that examines the influence of money on politics -- at least 268 of the 535 members of the 113th Congress need at least seven digits to disclose their net worth. By comparison, about 5% of American households are worth more than $1 million.


At the above link, you will find a list of the top ten wealthiest Congress critters out there. From $448+ million to $88+million #1 to #10 ..

And in that list is a pretty even spread of members of both political parties. The article points out many times in the past that government elected officials acted in a manner for personal profit.

It has been said the Rockerfellers sold Zyklon Gas to the Nazi's during WW2...

I was blown away at how corrupt it must be there in Wash., D.C.

There are more and others... so, I bet you heard of at least the first example?

I know that to me, some of this rings of treason almost for what this thread divulges, but the legal matters are covered.

The deep swamp has statutes of limitations on a lot of this stuff..5 years???

The uranium deal was 2010 I think.

Yep, you are spot on... it is like the spouse who accuses the other of cheating on them all the time.
It is usually the real cheater who does all of the accusing.

Good point, and I feel your pain my friend.

Pravdaseeker






a reply to: GuidedKill



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 06:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: Grambler

That further explains Hillary's endless claims that "The Russians did it!", and Obama and Hillary's continued "resist" activism, and the MSM continually pushing this "Russian Collusion" narrative. Perhaps Trump is guilty on some level for that, but it is obvious that Hillary and Obama should be the ones being looked at




Add Podesta into that mix as well....


Funny how those three just keep turning up. Like a really, really, really bad penny.



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 06:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian

originally posted by: Wardaddy454
To anyone wondering where the naysayers are, hold tight. Soros has transferred $18 billion to Open Society Foundation.

On topic: Not surprising in the least. I find it funny how often we were told Uranium One was "debunked".
Time to get the wheels of justice rolling.


"If you don't agree with me, you're a _______ shill"

The hallmark of objective, reasoned thinking.


Think about that the next time you make one of your threads.



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 06:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: theultimatebelgianjoke

originally posted by: DJW001

First, the "reset" with Russia. The Clinton administration needed to show some faith in the Putin administration. Second, America's uranium mining industry was in trouble.


Totally speculative and erroneous analysis. In 2010 Dimitri Medvedev was President of Russia.


Putin was prime minister and never really gave up his control of the Russian govt. In fact it was funny.Putin was barred from a third term by the Constitution. First Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev was elected his successor. On 8 May 2008, only a day after handing the presidency to Medvedev, Putin was appointed Prime Minister of Russia. In november of that year the restriction was removed from their constitution. In 2011 Medvedev decides to nominate Putin for president in the 2012. Elction.

Does anything you just read make you realize who was really in power? Putin controlled Russia period.



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 07:06 AM
link   
Update.

The hill is reporting the Senate judiciary committee is opening an investigation into this.

thehill.com...

This is great news if true.

Now cue all many people on the left (many we have seen on this very thread) about about what a bad idea this investigation is.



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 07:07 AM
link   
a reply to: dragonridr

When you read from the US MSM, Putin manages a personal fortune worth more than Warren Buffet. Putin personally decides of every single thing taking place in Russia, kills opponents, threathen elector at gunpoint during elections, reviews contracts, fixes prices, etc ... If you believe everything you read about Putin from western outlets, Putin must have 72 hours long days and must keeps himself more busy than Santa Claus on Christmas night.

There is no need to bash Putin for western audience, it is the Russians that are voting in Russia, and Putin's approval ratings over there are stagering in comparison to what most western leaders are having.
No I don't want to live in Putin's Russia, but if it is ok for the Russian themselves, I don't see any reason to obfuscate, it is their country.


edit on 18-10-2017 by theultimatebelgianjoke because: -



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 07:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: pravdaseeker
Dear ATS Readers, Writers,

Hi there GuidedKill; asked..



I'm really interested in hearing about anyone including republicans who have EVER done ANYTHING like this. This is selling Uranium to our enemy for profit!!

I HAVE NEVER HEARD OF ANYTHING LIKE THIS!!! PERIOD!!


Ah, I bet you have you just forgot about it.. I'll remind you of a couple I bet you knew about happening in the past.

There was that during WW2 Prescott Bush, W's grand pappy did business with Nazi's. Grand pappy Bush was still having some of his businesses taken away from him in 1950 as the US government was finally getting caught up on punishing those who did business with the Germans during WW2.

Over 150 Congress critter own own over 3.5 million bucks worth of Military Industrial Complex stock...

The 6 Most Popular Stocks In Congress



Get this: For the first time in history, more than half the members of Congress are millionaires . According to data from the Center for Responsive Politics -- a nonprofit that examines the influence of money on politics -- at least 268 of the 535 members of the 113th Congress need at least seven digits to disclose their net worth. By comparison, about 5% of American households are worth more than $1 million.


At the above link, you will find a list of the top ten wealthiest Congress critters out there. From $448+ million to $88+million #1 to #10 ..

And in that list is a pretty even spread of members of both political parties. The article points out many times in the past that government elected officials acted in a manner for personal profit.

It has been said the Rockerfellers sold Zyklon Gas to the Nazi's during WW2...

I was blown away at how corrupt it must be there in Wash., D.C.

There are more and others... so, I bet you heard of at least the first example?

I know that to me, some of this rings of treason almost for what this thread divulges, but the legal matters are covered.

The deep swamp has statutes of limitations on a lot of this stuff..5 years???

The uranium deal was 2010 I think.

Yep, you are spot on... it is like the spouse who accuses the other of cheating on them all the time.
It is usually the real cheater who does all of the accusing.

Good point, and I feel your pain my friend.

Pravdaseeker






a reply to: GuidedKill



I know darrell issa made his millions starting a company called Directed Electronics. So that kind of invalidaates your claims,since your implying he made that moneey while in congress off ssome kind of magic investments. When it costs an average of more than $10 million to win a seat, it’s no surprise that the wealthy and well-connected would be overrepresented.

You have former ceos all over the place and eve the presidency works that way millionairess run for office look at Mitt Romney Trummp Hillary etc.



posted on Oct, 18 2017 @ 07:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler
Update.

The hill is reporting the Senate judiciary committee is opening an investigation into this.

thehill.com...

This is great news if true.

Now cue all many people on the left (many we have seen on this very thread) about about what a bad idea this investigation is.

Well, that was fast. Republicans smell blood in the water. What's good for the goose is good for the gander, after all.


Still, the fact that Obama's people would approve the uranium deal while an active bribery investigation was taking place is appalling. On the surface, it certainly looks like a certain Secretary of State (and probably others) may have been given financial incentive to "forget" about that little problem.



new topics

top topics



 
141
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join