It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump Given A Subpoena For All Documents Relating To Assault Allegations

page: 3
12
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 01:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: whywhynot

originally posted by: olaru12
They tried to impeach Slick Willy for his consenting Bj in office.

Why should Trump get to skate for his assaults?


You don’t intellectually understand the difference between having a sexual encounter in the fing White House with an intern while in office and an alleged sexual assault as a private citizen years before entering public service? Hmmmmm
Personally I would rather go for sex in the "fing" White House over sexual assault on anyone at anytime. I mean they don't call it the "fing" White House for nothing.




posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 01:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: curme

And Harvey Weinstein, Bill Cosby, Bill O'Reilly, and Roger Ailes.

But no, this own't hurt Trump at all.


Lets though another name on the stack... Gloria Allred

When she is involved it is about 99% bull.



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 03:05 AM
link   
Pretty sure a subpoena for a politician is signed by a judge.



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 03:27 AM
link   

originally posted by: Metallicus

originally posted by: loam



Trump Given A Subpoena For All Documents Relating To Assault Allegations

A woman who said Donald Trump groped her has subpoenaed his campaign for documents about “any woman alleging that Donald J. Trump touched her inappropriately.” Trump has denied her accusations and is fighting the subpoena.

A high-stakes legal showdown is brewing for President Donald Trump, as a woman who said he groped her has subpoenaed all documents from his campaign pertaining to “any woman alleging that Donald J. Trump touched her inappropriately.”

The subpoena — whose contents have not been previously reported — was issued in March but entered into the court file last month. The White House did not respond to a request for comment, nor did Trump’s attorney.



This is breaking now.

So is this Trump's true vulnerability?


Everyone is vulnerable to lies from a group of people willing to do anything to remove them from power. This is how Herman Cain was taken out a few years ago.



Lies you say?

Because I'm pretty sure once again that there's video tape of him admitting it.


Sure lies.

It's possible.

He is certainly a known liar. None of us can deny that. He lies as casually as I breathe.



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 03:29 AM
link   
a reply to: loam

It was filed in March.

??


It's right there in the story.



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 03:31 AM
link   
a reply to: olaru12

No they didn't try to impeach slick Willy for getting a BJ.

They impeached him for LYING.


Ut oh.....
edit on 10162017 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 03:38 AM
link   
a reply to: Xtrozero

No it's not. The woman is a very successful lawyer.

You're being ridiculous in saying if she's involved it's bull.

That in itself is where the bull is.
You're just saying that because she's going after trump. You know it and so does everybody else.

If she was in fact going after Bill Clinton for something she'd be the greatest thing since sliced bread.
Again you know it and so does everybody else.
The truth is you never even heard of her before this.

The truth is you really have no idea about her or her career or her success rate.



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 03:44 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

There's no end to your nonsense is there?
You're like Felix the Cat with his endless bag of tricks.



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 03:45 AM
link   
a reply to: RazorV66




#ing hilarious that they just piss in the wind and hope some splashes on Trump.

Funny you should put it just that way....



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 03:49 AM
link   
a reply to: yuppa

Just like the Russia probe is turning up nothing?

LOL



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 03:51 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

What?



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 03:53 AM
link   
a reply to: MysticPearl

So we should just never believe a woman who says she was assaulted because....she's a woman?

And you say liberals are sexist.


I'm not sure you know what that word means dear.



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 06:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: MysticPearl

So we should just never believe a woman who says she was assaulted because....she's a woman?

And you say liberals are sexist.


I'm not sure you know what that word means dear.

I would be very carful believing a woman with an agenda or a man for that matter.



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 06:43 AM
link   
a reply to: Metallicus

But how do you know they are lies?

Seems more than plausible to me.




posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 06:58 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Yes, but only first available last month.



...was issued in March but entered into the court file last month.



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 08:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: loam

so they got wind that the "Russia investigations" are looking completely retarded and will show their failure at finding anything illicit. This shall foreshadow their ability to waste countless tax dollars over nothing.

So in turn they do this. Spit in the faces of women who were real victims of sexual assault, just to keep the witch hunt going.

Kiss my ass with this already...


That's pretty much it.

The Russian collusion garbage was never real and never going to fly. Now they have to jump on whatever the next BS idea is.

America is tired of it and sees right through it. Sorry Liberals, you're playbook is done.



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 09:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: whywhynot

originally posted by: olaru12
They tried to impeach Slick Willy for his consenting Bj in office.

Why should Trump get to skate for his assaults?


You don’t intellectually understand the difference between having a sexual encounter in the fing White House with an intern while in office and an alleged sexual assault as a private citizen years before entering public service? Hmmmmm


Apparently, you don't intellectually understand the difference between consensual and non-consensual (sexual assault).



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 09:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: yuppa

Just like the Russia probe is turning up nothing?

LOL


Was trump prosecuted for his comments? NO he was not. Did said woman press charges? No she did not. SOme women like a aggressive guy.

ANd SO far No nothing on Trump himself. No prosecution. No conviction,so No not anything has turned up. Oh and Lol.

remember its not guilty until proven to be so. Not the other way around.



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 09:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: whywhynot

originally posted by: olaru12
They tried to impeach Slick Willy for his consenting Bj in office.

Why should Trump get to skate for his assaults?


You don’t intellectually understand the difference between having a sexual encounter in the fing White House with an intern while in office and an alleged sexual assault as a private citizen years before entering public service? Hmmmmm


Apparently, you don't intellectually understand the difference between consensual and non-consensual (sexual assault).


The same difference between lies and facts. Its mighty funny how all the sudden these women come out of nowhere(some of them PAID to do so) and make accusations.
But heres whats missing. a CONVICTION or a Trial. Until those happen He is Innocent.



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 09:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: yuppa

Just like the Russia probe is turning up nothing?

LOL


Was trump prosecuted for his comments? NO he was not. Did said woman press charges? No she did not. SOme women like a aggressive guy.

ANd SO far No nothing on Trump himself. No prosecution. No conviction,so No not anything has turned up. Oh and Lol.

remember its not guilty until proven to be so. Not the other way around.


Unfortunately no conviction for the elite is not an indicator of justice. Ahem HRC.




top topics



 
12
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join