It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Firearms resolution to soon be passed.

page: 17
12
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 17 2017 @ 10:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: muzzleflash

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: muzzleflash


The technology definitely already exists off the shelf.


Prove it.

Seriously. Prove it.


Prove what?

That GPS and fingerprint scanners exist?
What do you mean?


You said the tech for these weapons to work is available off the shelf.

Prove it is.
edit on 17102017 by TerryDon79 because: (no reason given)




posted on Oct, 17 2017 @ 10:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: Noinden
a reply to: muzzleflash

Look I understand the fiction aspect of this appeals to you. I really do. However this thread was created to alarm people with guns.

On further investigation, the OP has admitted this is not something that is being "put into law" or something which exists. It is an idea. An idea which can not be implemented, due to how guns work. IF this technology existed, you would need to replace every single mechanical gun on the streets, all over the world. With electronic guns.

Chances of this happening is?


100%.

By the year 2250 of course.



posted on Oct, 17 2017 @ 10:12 PM
link   
a reply to: muzzleflash

Unless you have a Vortex Manipulator or a TARDIS. Then its not "off the shelf"



posted on Oct, 17 2017 @ 10:12 PM
link   
a reply to: Noinden

never claimed any retrofit, older guns only fitted with a GPS device like a sim chip that pings off towers for location only.

But it looks as though the tech is out there and no doubt may be a lot closer than many think.

Maybe the Gov has a block on links to their pages I tried to fix it but it still wont work.

image of server, user gun and adminster



posted on Oct, 17 2017 @ 10:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: muzzleflash

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: muzzleflash


The technology definitely already exists off the shelf.


Prove it.

Seriously. Prove it.


Prove what?

That GPS and fingerprint scanners exist?
What do you mean?


You said the tech for these weapons to work is available off the shelf.

Prove it is.


You want me to prove electronics components exist?
I don't understand what you mean.

Maybe you're being facetious, so lol...



posted on Oct, 17 2017 @ 10:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: Noinden
a reply to: muzzleflash

Unless you have a Vortex Manipulator or a TARDIS. Then its not "off the shelf"


So you believe that we cannot design a firearm with a GPS / fingerprint system integrated with the available technology right now?? You gotta be kidding me.

Which component are you saying we do not have access to currently that doesn't exist?



posted on Oct, 17 2017 @ 10:15 PM
link   
a reply to: ChesterJohn

That’s a new smart firearm patent, not a modification for existing firearms.

Remember, YOU said existing firearms.



posted on Oct, 17 2017 @ 10:16 PM
link   
a reply to: muzzleflash

The GPS technology for this to work doesn’t exist. After you were told that, you said it’s available “off the shelf”. It’s not and I asked you to prove it was.

Now you’re trying to side step.



posted on Oct, 17 2017 @ 10:16 PM
link   
a reply to: ChesterJohn

Again neighbour. That would require gun owners bring their guns in. The chances are ? What about illegal guns?

A GPS chip can easily be nerfed, spoofed, or disabled. Just like the anklets on criminals are always "being beaten" with a determined criminal.

As for your link? People patent nonsense all the time. Every time I go looking for ways to make Pharmaceuticals for my clients, I see utter balls that some academic thinks is worth a patent. Never mind its not scalable, or even workable. So just because there is a patent, it does not mean its a technology that works.

That aside.

FUTURE tech is FUTURE. It is not a resolution about to be passed. QED you lied in the subject line



posted on Oct, 17 2017 @ 10:18 PM
link   
here is another to the image of how one would work if near a gun free zone like a school

gund safety system



posted on Oct, 17 2017 @ 10:20 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

I didn't side step anything.

GPS technology definitely exists in many forms.
My phone has it even.



posted on Oct, 17 2017 @ 10:20 PM
link   
a reply to: muzzleflash

No I do not believe it is an "off the shelf" item. The tech is unreliable and hackable. If you'd read the thread, you would have seen the arguments.

This "idea" does not solve gun problems.
This idea is "not a resolution about to be passed".
Retrofitting all guns with a GPS chip, will not happen. Simply because the American gun owning public soil themselves at the idea of the government getting involved (sort of why the 2nd ammendment exists, not completely but sort of).

Thus the OP is bunk



posted on Oct, 17 2017 @ 10:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: ChesterJohn
here is another to the image of how one would work if near a gun free zone like a school

gund safety system


Did you read it?

It’s about smart firearms, NOT current firearms with a chip.



posted on Oct, 17 2017 @ 10:20 PM
link   
a reply to: Noinden

I would love to link you to my patents but then you would have my real name and address.

I sell one device with out a patent but I just renew the patent pending for a few years. Then I usually will purchase the patents but one thing is they are not cheap.



posted on Oct, 17 2017 @ 10:21 PM
link   
a reply to: muzzleflash

Your phone conducts radiowaves well.
Your phone has a power source you recharge
Guns don't. A chip needs an antenna and a battery to even vaguely GPS. Lets ignore the dead spots. You've had that happen right?



posted on Oct, 17 2017 @ 10:21 PM
link   
a reply to: muzzleflash

But it doesn’t exist in the way needed for the OPs idea to work.

As I, and others, have already said.



posted on Oct, 17 2017 @ 10:21 PM
link   
a reply to: ChesterJohn

Thanks for the patent links.

Looks like you were right about this after all.



posted on Oct, 17 2017 @ 10:22 PM
link   
a reply to: ChesterJohn

You don't have patents. You have demonstrated an inability to critically think. You are about as apt with technology, as someone who has spent the last two decades hermiting.



posted on Oct, 17 2017 @ 10:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: muzzleflash

But it doesn’t exist in the way needed for the OPs idea to work.

As I, and others, have already said.


Regular GPS tech works fine. You just integrate it into the system.



posted on Oct, 17 2017 @ 10:22 PM
link   
a reply to: ChesterJohn

Of course you do.

Just like you had a meeting and got told this idea was “soon to be passed”.



new topics

top topics



 
12
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join