It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Drones Did Vegas Shooting ⁈ Paddock Deep State IRS LockHeed NASA

page: 7
84
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 12:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Asktheanimals

One question I have is if Paddock broke the windows from the inside, then where are the reports about broken glass on the ground from the window. Did anyone get injured from the falling glass?




posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 12:02 PM
link   
a reply to: keys2heaven

I believe the glass would have fallen onto a roof top, not the ground. I've heard this mentioned several times so I'm assuming it's accurate. Most likely it's the casino roof top.

However, there is one video that mentions falling glass but I have no idea how that person would have seen that.



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 12:29 PM
link   
I don't buy it. If it was done with drones, that's big drones over a heavily populated area. Somebody somewhere would have grabbed footage of weird big drones flying about.

And way too much of a risk of one crashing, on a road, in a crowd. And how do you cover that up?

One photo of an armed drone on facebook and the whole gig is busted.

Crazy idea.



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 12:43 PM
link   
Vegas Coverup Collapsing: Sheriff May Be In Danger



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 01:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Painterz
I don't buy it. If it was done with drones, that's big drones over a heavily populated area. Somebody somewhere would have grabbed footage of weird big drones flying about.

And way too much of a risk of one crashing, on a road, in a crowd. And how do you cover that up?

One photo of an armed drone on facebook and the whole gig is busted.

Crazy idea.


Another consideration is that Drones as small as that have a very short flight time due to the battery. Maybe 40 minutes at best, but probably less with a package hanging from the bottom.



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 01:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Painterz
I don't buy it. If it was done with drones, that's big drones over a heavily populated area. Somebody somewhere would have grabbed footage of weird big drones flying about.

And way too much of a risk of one crashing, on a road, in a crowd. And how do you cover that up?

One photo of an armed drone on facebook and the whole gig is busted.

Crazy idea.


The shooting only lasted 10 minutes.
It's the same distance from Janet air parking lot to the concert as it was from from Paddock's room.
If a drone did crash it would be quickly retrievable as it never left their property.
edit on 16-10-2017 by Asktheanimals because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 01:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: Asktheanimals

originally posted by: Painterz
I don't buy it. If it was done with drones, that's big drones over a heavily populated area. Somebody somewhere would have grabbed footage of weird big drones flying about.

And way too much of a risk of one crashing, on a road, in a crowd. And how do you cover that up?

One photo of an armed drone on facebook and the whole gig is busted.

Crazy idea.


The shooting only lasted 10 minutes.
It's the same distance from Janet air parking lot the concert as it was from from Paddock's room.
If a drone did crash it would be quickly retrievable as it never left their property.



So your saying they could have been small drones where they could hardly be seen at night.

...And they did this, why ?

To test the killing potential of shooting bullets on enemies from drones ?



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 01:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: Domo1
The theories are getting more and more far fetched. I suppose that makes sense considering they really haven't told the public much at all. All the conflicting stuff is the same crap you see with every single mass shooting. It happens EVERY time. There's always going to be a ton of confusion, especially at first.

Well, then we can also expect a good chunk of responses to the official report -- when it eventually comes out -- saying that the report is a huge cover-up, and ATS will have another conspiracy to kick around for the next decade.



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 02:26 PM
link   
a reply to: Blue Shift

Designer - "Let's test this drone out. It's a beauty that can haul an AR, but we need to see if it's stable enough for use in the field."

Boss - "OK. We'll need a clear line of sight and a target to practice on.

Designer - "Thanks boss! Can I book Saturday on the target range? We'll need some stationary objects to fire on and some live animals. I'll go and let the boys know!"

Boss - "No, hmmmm.....I think we'll arrange a clandestine night shoot at unarmed civilians at a music concert. We'll spend months creating a patsy and send a few teams to sow discord in the media and confuse stuff. Shoudn't take more than a few dozen teams and help from the media and FBI."

Designer - "Sir, we can do all the testing out on the proving grounds and have the results by the weekend."

Boss - "Trust me kid. Let me show you how to boil water. Only idiots use pans. First we remove wet washing from the garden of a home in the next State...just enough for someone to notice; not enough to prove... "



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 02:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: djz3ro

originally posted by: Domo1

Why would they test these things on civilians at home? We're not exactly short on enemies and remote locations in some sandy place would be a far better area.



I hear you, this is my problem with this too. Any new military hardware, surely would be tested on enemy combatants?

On the subject of drones, I've been wondering for a while now how long it will be before one radical group or another flies an SMG equipped drone into a busy urban sprawl and unleashes hell. I don't think it's a case of if but when...


What if they were new drones specifically designed for "crowd control" or subduing an internal threat, rather than front line military?



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 02:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kandinsky
Designer - "Sir, we can do all the testing out on the proving grounds and have the results by the weekend."

I already suggested in another thread that it was only a matter of time before Area 51 and aliens and stuff were going to be thrown into this stew pot.



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 02:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Blue Shift

Took them five minutes



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 02:37 PM
link   
a reply to: Kandinsky

I'm surprised it took that long. Hell, I saw in another thread that the fuel tanks were the real target.
edit on 10/16/2017 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 02:42 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

I saw that too. Some incidents are so crazy people need crazier explanations to deal with them.



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 02:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dem0nc1eaner

What if they were new drones specifically designed for "crowd control" or subduing an internal threat, rather than front line military?



Even then there are plenty places to try them out.

The "Ermagawd they'z comin' ta' take aar guns" would have us believe rhis is on the name of gun control but I don't buy that for one minute. First of all, most people who want to ban guns does so because they respect human life (or animal life in some cases), I've never heard of someone wanting tighter gun restrictions to profit from it. With that in mind, why would someone who feels this way slaughter people to further their agenda? It maketh no sense, to thought ask me...



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 02:50 PM
link   



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 03:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: Ophiuchus 13
Not discrediting anyone's Conspiracy theories belief systems, but why if following the premise of the Op being true didn't the drones continue shooting the fuel tanks to blow the feul tanks and cause more destruction?

Also where are the many shell casings from the drones?

Again not discrediting anyone just some questions that came to mind...


Where are the 'many shell casings' from the 32nd floor, not to mention the 200 holes in the door or hallway walls and carpeting?



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 03:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Asktheanimals

I've shown this video to 9 different people now. They don't care or look into the shooting. 8 out of the 9 thought they saw gunfire with corresponding smoke from the shots. 4 said yeah so what a helicopter is shooting at the shooter to stop the shooting. I had to explain that is not what took place. As it took them an hour to even breach the door.



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 03:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Crumbles

It's hard enough to have a conversation about it with people who are familiar with the details of the event.
Its not my theory but I do think Vin Armani has done a better job of putting together all the pieces than anyone else.
I've now heard 2 eye witnesses say they believe helicopters were shooting at them.
Considering this a conspiracy site I wonder why some can't fathom helicopters or drones shooting at a crowd.



posted on Oct, 16 2017 @ 03:26 PM
link   
a reply to: Giraffe

Hi Giraffe, I've put together a theory as to why people might keep filming.
Mostly because they don't believe they are in danger.
If you were told this was a drill......www.abovetopsecret.com...




top topics



 
84
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join