posted on Oct, 15 2017 @ 03:06 PM
a reply to: djz3ro
Yep, and a helo would be easily explainable as well.
"The helo was filming footage of the crowd and concert for possible vids or future promos."
At least one person at the concert stated that they were running away from the MB shooter and ran toward the back of the venue stage that they were
facing shooting as they fled. They had the stage between them and Paddock supposedly, which should have been a line of sight issue, but they ran
directly into fire. If he's the only shooter, then how did they run into fire coming from in front while running away from him?
There is also the issue of the reported shots coming from the area of the Bellagio Hotel which supposedly hit the front doors, shattering the glass. I
know very little of guns, but isn't the Bellagio Hotel over a mile away from the MB hotel? How would shots coming from MB hit the front of the
Bellagio if Paddock was the only shooter?
Drones of some sort firing down into the crowd from differing directions would go a long way toward explaining some of the strangeness of this
As for why test drones like this? Fear. Take out innocent people and blame it on the terrorists, or on the crazy old guy with a death wish. Keep
people on edge and afraid. Create boogeymen and blame them for all the evils of the world so that the evil monsters behind the scenes are no longer
under the microscope. Doesn't it seem rather suspicious that we have this shooting which once more catapults guns/gun violence into the spotlight,
then right after, the Weinstein revelation.
On the heels of that, more and more people are coming forth and implicating other big names in media for similar crimes? Sounds like deflection to me.
"Don't look behind the curtain in LV. Look at Hollyweird instead." We've got sacrificial lambs being served up on platters right now to distract