It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump destroying Nuclear agreement with Iran.

page: 2
11
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 13 2017 @ 04:35 PM
link   
a reply to: nemonimity

He's seriously thinking of axing NAFTA too.




posted on Oct, 13 2017 @ 04:36 PM
link   
a reply to: feldercarb

would it matter? Didnt Iran almost IMMEDIATELY break the deal after it was signed, more than once......???
edit on 10/13/2017 by ManBehindTheMask because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 13 2017 @ 04:39 PM
link   
a reply to: whywhynot

Yeah not seeing it..



posted on Oct, 13 2017 @ 04:39 PM
link   
a reply to: intrepid

Good. it is over 30 years old and the world has changed. Workplaces, technology and exports for all countries have changed. What is wrong with re-visiting old policies?



posted on Oct, 13 2017 @ 04:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: nemonimity
a reply to: Woodcarver


I posted this here because the issue is with American political nuttiness and the president's flagrant disregard for agreements in place, not to educate anyone on the inner workings of the Iran Nuclear deal.


You post your opinion but refuse to articulate why you believe what you do. Kind of makes your post pointless doesn’t it?



posted on Oct, 13 2017 @ 04:41 PM
link   
a reply to: nemonimity

That doesn’t surprise me.



posted on Oct, 13 2017 @ 04:43 PM
link   
a reply to: matafuchs

Well coming from this administration it's like being prepared to get bent over without lube. If your closest trading partner feels this way what do other partners OR, maybe more importantly, future ones that decide to not get into anything with it?



posted on Oct, 13 2017 @ 04:43 PM
link   
a reply to: loam

I'm not following. The agreement is in place, we have mechanism in place in case Iran doesn't follow the guidelines, but the oversight in place is saying they have followed the guidelines and Trump still insists that they aren't so he want's to change the agreement at best or will get rid of it if congress won't capitulate, not really finding the distortion to the subject matter.



posted on Oct, 13 2017 @ 04:43 PM
link   
Trump is an unmitigated disaster of immense proportions.


He’s evil. Listen what he dare says to the people of Puerto Rico.


Cutting aid to the poor on health care while cutting taxes for the rich

Encouraging wars with Iran and n Korea

The man is EVIL, depraved, ignorant, and a menace to what's left of civilization



posted on Oct, 13 2017 @ 04:44 PM
link   
a reply to: whywhynot

I question your reading comprehension, I do specifically state why doing what he's doing is bad.



posted on Oct, 13 2017 @ 04:50 PM
link   
a reply to: intrepid

It could also benefit. I guess with Obama, even though I did not agree with his policies, at the beginning I gave him a shot. That all ended with the ARRA and him calling police dumb in the first six months. I knew that he was trying to fundamentally change the country but he was also being controlled. Obama answered to donors and handlers. He made them all a lot of money.

The same should be done for Trump. If he renegotiated NAFTA and Canada's GDP rose 1-2% it would be good, right? I do not think he is trying to stick it to anyone as much as he wants it to be a good deal for all.



posted on Oct, 13 2017 @ 04:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: nemonimity
a reply to: whywhynot

I question your reading comprehension, I do specifically state why doing what he's doing is bad.


I question your state of mind. If you do specifically state it then answer woodcarver’s questions. Kind of put up or shut.



posted on Oct, 13 2017 @ 04:54 PM
link   
We in the US don't really have to worry about Iran.

But Iran is to Israel like North Korea is to South Korea and Japan.

We really just have to support our allies.



posted on Oct, 13 2017 @ 04:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
We really just have to support our allies.


I could have swore that Germany, France, and UK were US allies as well?

Must be mistaken.



posted on Oct, 13 2017 @ 04:58 PM
link   
a reply to: nemonimity

Whenever someone questions someone else's 'reading comprehension' it is usually quickly followed by stating anything you do not agree with is a 'strawman argument'. Then you will attack a few posters and leave your OP.

You said and explained NOTHING in your OP. It sounded like the drunk rambling of a 16 year old who got high for the first time and hates daddy. Seriously. You could not get 31 words in without insulting the POTUS.

You tried to compare the Iranian nuclear deal to a rental agreement. Well, if you were renting and were told to have no pets and you got a pet guess what..you are out on your ass. No courts. No need. Sheriff shows up and throws your ass out. Iran stopped complying days after the deal. O was too much of a narcissist to admit wrongdoing so it moved forward. There were some major deals with Iran with US and global businesses so it was all about money...not our safety.
edit on Octpm31pmf0000002017-10-13T16:58:49-05:000449 by matafuchs because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 13 2017 @ 04:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: peck420

originally posted by: DBCowboy
We really just have to support our allies.


I could have swore that Germany, France, and UK were US allies as well?

Must be mistaken.


They are.

How many of them are targeted by Iran?



posted on Oct, 13 2017 @ 05:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: matafuchs
Seriously. You could not get 31 words in without insulting the POTUS.



To be frank the POTUS doesn't go 31 words before he's insultable.



posted on Oct, 13 2017 @ 05:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: peck420

originally posted by: DBCowboy
We really just have to support our allies.


I could have swore that Germany, France, and UK were US allies as well?

Must be mistaken.


They are.

How many of them are targeted by Iran?


A better question would be how many of them sell stuff to Iran!



posted on Oct, 13 2017 @ 05:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
They are.

How many of them are targeted by Iran?

NATO says all of them.



posted on Oct, 13 2017 @ 05:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: matafuchs
Seriously. You could not get 31 words in without insulting the POTUS.



To be frank the POTUS doesn't go 31 words before he's insultable.


Insults and emotion rarely make a convincing statement but they do convey an inability to communicate.


edit on 13-10-2017 by whywhynot because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
11
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join