It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Tropomi (TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument) will be a spectrometer sensing ultraviolet (UV), visible (VIS), near (NIR) and short-wavelength infrared (SWIR) to monitor ozone, methane, formaldehyde, aerosol, carbon monoxide, NO2 and SO2 in the atmosphere. It extends the capabilities of the OMI from the Aura satellite and the SCIAMACHY instrument from Envisat.[5]
One would imagine that if chemtrails really existed out there, this would spot them in a heartbeat, or the dastardly PTB would have prevented the project?
...to monitor ozone, methane, formaldehyde, aerosol, carbon monoxide, NO2 and SO2 in the atmosphere.
originally posted by: mrthumpy
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: waynos
You mean, 'If jet exhaust exists in the atmosphere', don't you? Because among other things, the chemicals they list include the components of jet exhaust...
I'd have thought it would pick up the pollution from any number of sources
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: mrthumpy
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: waynos
You mean, 'If jet exhaust exists in the atmosphere', don't you? Because among other things, the chemicals they list include the components of jet exhaust...
I'd have thought it would pick up the pollution from any number of sources
Yes it will. Show me one spectrograph reading from space of fuku fallout.
I don't mean the tons of projected, computer modeled or made up crap either.
originally posted by: mrthumpy
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: mrthumpy
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: waynos
You mean, 'If jet exhaust exists in the atmosphere', don't you? Because among other things, the chemicals they list include the components of jet exhaust...
I'd have thought it would pick up the pollution from any number of sources
Yes it will. Show me one spectrograph reading from space of fuku fallout.
I don't mean the tons of projected, computer modeled or made up crap either.
I think this might be the forum you're looking for
www.abovetopsecret.com...
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: mrthumpy
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: mrthumpy
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: waynos
You mean, 'If jet exhaust exists in the atmosphere', don't you? Because among other things, the chemicals they list include the components of jet exhaust...
I'd have thought it would pick up the pollution from any number of sources
Yes it will. Show me one spectrograph reading from space of fuku fallout.
I don't mean the tons of projected, computer modeled or made up crap either.
I think this might be the forum you're looking for
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Lol, the super threads about Fukushima, parts one and two, have gone "missing".
Nice misdirect.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: mrthumpy
So essentially you don't trust the air quality monitoring data. Got it
What data? "Elevated", "Unhealthy" and "Dangerous" good enough for your kids at school?
originally posted by: mrthumpy
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: mrthumpy
So essentially you don't trust the air quality monitoring data. Got it
What data? "Elevated", "Unhealthy" and "Dangerous" good enough for your kids at school?
Get involved with some Citizen science then
www.sciencedirect.com...
Don't just sit on your ass bitching about the data you're given. Get off it and do something
Perhaps then, you could pass by a thread without wrecking it with off topic tears.
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: mrthumpy
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: mrthumpy
So essentially you don't trust the air quality monitoring data. Got it
What data? "Elevated", "Unhealthy" and "Dangerous" good enough for your kids at school?
Get involved with some Citizen science then
www.sciencedirect.com...
Don't just sit on your ass bitching about the data you're given. Get off it and do something
I'm questioning, you're 'bitching' about that.
Citizen science? Citizens depend on 'Scientists' and media outlets for accurate up to date information.
Not color bars, deflection, and insult.
Like we're beginning to see here form one ATS wrecking crew.
a reply to: waynos
One would imagine that if chemtrails really existed out there, this would spot them in a heartbeat, or the dastardly PTB would have prevented the project?
originally posted by: TheInfiniteFantastic
a reply to: waynos
One would imagine that if chemtrails really existed out there, this would spot them in a heartbeat, or the dastardly PTB would have prevented the project?
More to the point, one should be asking, why in earth is this topic in a conspiracy section?