The Bellagio Hotel interview.

a reply to: TobyFlenderson

Yeah, this whole case study is disturbing in that we've devolved culturally since 9/11 that the trivialization of such an event, the rapid response of hoaxer trolls to twist the thing into their own personal brands of doom porn entertainment, etc, not a good sign the direction we're going in the process of people coming to grips with A Conspiracy like this isnt beyond "our" Government.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Amen. The fact that the law enforcement story keeps changing is raising issues even in MSM. People have questions and the LEO's are screwing it up. These screw ups, along with the lack of video being released, leads me to believe that this investigation is a lot hotter than they are portraying. If that's the case and they bring whatever accomplices Paddock may've had to justice, then perhaps they can clear things up for us. But the longer that takes, the more doubt that will settle in and the more theories that will be propounded.

a reply to: TobyFlenderson

I have no idea whats on the TV. I wouldnt even known much besides it happened unless I was hanging around here.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

By MSM I meant the Boston Herald and BBC news, both read online. I don't watch TV news either.

I saw the ladies post the morning she put it up. She struck me as someone walking around trying to get as much as she could while also being in a bit of shock. Tracybeanz interview was her convinced me even more so that the lady was legit. Her body language was fine and she mentioned little unimportant details all throughout the telling of her story. It really did sound like two friends sitting down and one telling the other of their experience.

I think the sheriff is being made to lie and he is not comfortable with that at all.

I'm not going to go over the whole night, but I don't think gun control was the issue here at all. I think that's just a bit of a handy fall back.

I think there was something big going down that night and something somewhere along the lines went very very wrong. I am leaning towards arms deal or a hit. Perhaps they got mixed up and became both. Paddock ending up being the hit.

The real truth of the night would probably not be taken very well at all by we the people and that is a understatement to say the least. So we were stuck with these other sort of bad stories or ones we are used too to appease us.

Something tells me though, the people aren't going to let this one go. The used to be sleepers have even woken up to this bad smell. People are digging faster than the FBI can cover their tracks. Hence all the story changes. It really is becoming ludicrous at this point.

The faucet is on though and the trickle is flowing...

originally posted by: TobyFlenderson
The thing that really caught my attention was how Mr. Silent FBI Automaton doesn't change expression or look at her when she's going off.

HE NEVER BLINKS!!!

The reason to hide multiple shooters is because it wouldn't support the call for body scanners and x-ray machines at check-in at hotels. If this is some actual terror attack, those machines aren't going to do much of anything b/c they aren't going to stop a terrorist storming the hotel, but "they will stop a gunman from setting up a "NEST""....

originally posted by: FlyingFox

originally posted by: TobyFlenderson
The thing that really caught my attention was how Mr. Silent FBI Automaton doesn't change expression or look at her when she's going off.

HE NEVER BLINKS!!!

Lol! I guess you could describe him as Gunga Din in his spirit form!

I really don't see the big panic this woman is making it out to be! Great that she is telling a "Story" of a shooter but she has nothing that adds other than her testimony that I think is being promoted...

Yes there were shots heard outside the hotel and along the strip after the shooter was supposedly dead.

She was not involved in any sort of danger but by her video you wouldn't think that...

Here's an additional video from the witness at the Bellagio, with subtitles for the commentary, and reiterates that glass windows/doors were broken by automatic shooting, (confirmed by her husband) that the hotel was in lockdown...and it seems that there is agreement from a security man that there was shooting from outside the hotel. Along with the time frame this can only mean there was at least one other person shooting that night, and while Paddock was already deceased.

originally posted by: abeverage
I really don't see the big panic this woman is making it out to be! Great that she is telling a "Story" of a shooter but she has nothing that adds other than her testimony that I think is being promoted...

Yes there were shots heard outside the hotel and along the strip after the shooter was supposedly dead.

She was not involved in any sort of danger but by her video you wouldn't think that...

What?! How is that not big?! If her story is true, it shows another shooter, whether cops or someone else, happening that night which I think is pretty big news. How is that not important to finding out what really happened that night?? Do you not think we should be told the entire true story?

originally posted by: abeverage
I really don't see the big panic this woman is making it out to be! Great that she is telling a "Story" of a shooter but she has nothing that adds other than her testimony that I think is being promoted...

Yes there were shots heard outside the hotel and along the strip after the shooter was supposedly dead.

She was not involved in any sort of danger but by her video you wouldn't think that...

The video is of the aftermath, not the moment of the shooting. As for danger, her husband was on top of her when the shots were fired...so I presume he's a numb nut too then?

The video below your post is in the near aftermath.

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Or if the attack wasnt precisely a conspiracy, still, why cover up more shooters? More shooters should stoke the anti-gun legislation agenda, no?

From a conspiracy standpoint:

Having multiple shooters makes a "group" responsible and causes people to focus on that issue (Alt-right, Antifa, Islam). So it in no way furthers an anti-gun agenda. If anything it promotes a desire for the average person to defend themselves.

However, a single shooter transfers guilt to ALL gun owners as it could have been anybody that did this act. All it takes is a guy and a gun.

From a psyOp perspective - know your target audience.

Want to make "men" evil? Have a group commit a crime.

Want an "object" to be evil? Have a lone Wolf do the act.

9/11 vs. One October

Both will become pivotal moments in American history and we no longer need an excuse to go to war with anyone ...

Sorry if I don't believe her dramatic story of how she spent the night looking for exciting drama, while there were other people actually experiencing it! To me she is an attention seeker and the truth will out on that.

Here are some facts: Every Large Casino on the Strip down to Excalibur was put on Lockdown! Every single one...so the Bellagio Hotel was as well.

Now what facts do we have about a shooting at the Bellagio, Any Video Evidence? NO!!!...broken glass? NO... Bullet holes? NO Shell casings NO...Arrests NO...

What do we have then?
Testimony of someone that is telling you what we already knew there was a shooting and lockdown on the strip!

Seeking publicity is what I see and did anyone...ANYONE bother to Doxy her? See how it might benefit her?

You know I did...

Its obvious there was shooting going on after Paddock was dead. Videos and peoples testimonies have proven such.

This entire even is so strange!!!

Here is another video which is undeniable, there are shots after Paddock is dead at the Belagio.

Wont embed... try the link

www.youtube.com...

originally posted by: abeverage
Sorry if I don't believe her dramatic story of how she spent the night looking for exciting drama, while there were other people actually experiencing it! To me she is an attention seeker and the truth will out on that.

Why do you not just say she (and her husband) are liars, and that you're not, since that is all that you can say that might be straightforward enough...but you couldn't, instead you need to add to it and try to characterise her as some kind of tart forby.

Thing is, you were stuck in the Mandalay, so you can't possibly know what went on at the Bellagio, however she.....and her husband, were at the Bellagio.

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
What is the point of any of it from start to finish??

People have a tendency to want logical explanations. It bugs us that the dude sitting next to us on the bus might be hording guns and explosives so he can go out in a blaze of glory because he was forced to pay an automatic tip on some service he wasn't satisfied with.

What's the craziest motive so far? I think we should say that he has had contact with a worker at Area 51 and they were trying out an alien brain slug on him for mind control.

originally posted by: smurfy

originally posted by: abeverage
Sorry if I don't believe her dramatic story of how she spent the night looking for exciting drama, while there were other people actually experiencing it! To me she is an attention seeker and the truth will out on that.

Why do you not just say she (and her husband) are liars, and that you're not, since that is all that you can say that might be straightforward enough...but you couldn't, instead you need to add to it and try to characterise her as some kind of tart forby.

Thing is, you were stuck in the Mandalay, so you can't possibly know what went on at the Bellagio, however she.....and her husband, were at the Bellagio.

What I am saying is there was lots of false reports and there was a lot going on that night. I was however not stuck in the Mandalay I was out on the strip for most of the night. I was also at a conference with other co-workers of which were staying at different hotels including the Belagio and none reported there was a shooter they did report that the hotel was locked down, which although a little concerning it is not as frightening as actually being shot at or being locked out of your hotel with SWAT teams looking for a shooter...But you're right I wasn't at that hotel, but what I say was hardly a harrowing experience that deserves that much attention honestly nor do I think adds to native...

I will say is there is no other evidence there was a shooter in the Bellagio and she is making a lot of that there was.

originally posted by: [post=22764000]IgnoranceIsntBlisss
What is the point of any of it from start to finish??

originally posted by: Blue Shift
People have a tendency to want logical explanations. It bugs us that the dude sitting next to us on the bus might be hording guns and explosives so he can go out in a blaze of glory because he was forced to pay an automatic tip on some service he wasn't satisfied with.

What's the craziest motive so far? I think we should say that he has had contact with a worker at Area 51 and they were trying out an alien brain slug on him for mind control.

You are missing the 'subtlety' in the 'question' it's not a question at all, it's a statement to emphasise that this was a man on his own. Other people have doubts...serious ones at that.

Of course, you answer actually compounds what he was really saying.

I am beginning to think this was a government operation. Americans are very rapidly slipping out of their control and starting to question the world they really live in. Are we really as free as we think. If tptb are ever found out they they would really like it if people could be disarmed before that goes from our current state to a known fact how bad they have treated us. Hence, mass shootings and shills like Hillary popping out on queue to make a hard push for gun control.

If that is the case they don't want people knowing there were other shooters until they can make up a plausible deniability and all the facts pan out as they say they do. Because that takes time to cross your t's and dot your i's when today so many can sleuth and show the media and govt as having lied.

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Wide-Eyes

Okay fine, but why risk blowing The Conspiracy by having loose cannons no part of The Official Narrative out running around like this?

Or if the attack wasnt precisely a conspiracy, still, why cover up more shooters? More shooters should stoke the anti-gun legislation agenda, no?