It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: avgguy
a reply to: jimmyx
Or you could have to choose between a Kia and a Hyundai but pay a Maserati payment like Obamacare
originally posted by: spiritualzombie
Skimpier health coverage - wow, what an improvement.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: peter_kandra
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan
You do know that the rate of change of rising insurance prices was much higher pre-ACA right?
Maybe in fantasy land, but not in the reality I see when I pay my premiums each month.
Fantasy land? Lol. People have actually looked at the numbers then and now and compared them.
I was paying maybe $450 a month pre-ACA for a decent family plan...going up maybe 6 or 7% a year. There were numerous providers servicing my state, so I always also had the option of price shopping. The first year of ACA, my premiums shot up 68%. They're now over $1,100 a month and that's with one kid out of the house and off the plan. Plus my deductibles and co-insurance are so high that nothing is covered except routine visits.
Your personal anecdote isn't the nation's anecdote. That's why you don't use anecdotes to prove a point. You rely on statistical data for that.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: network dude
Well if you read the article, it goes into it, but I know you won't so I'll resummarize here. The problem is that adding plans that aren't ACA compliant will send healthy people to them because they are cheaper. This causes a death spiral in the ACA plans as only sick people are left in that pool. So prices increase drastically. Then, ultimately, we are in the same situation we were in from 2000 - 2009. With health insurance prices rising exponentially from year to year and covering less and less health issues.
originally posted by: avgguy
a reply to: jimmyx
Well when you let them write the legislation what do you think will happen? Obama and friends painted a dog turd and sold it as a tootsie roll.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan
You do know that the rate of change of rising insurance prices was much higher pre-ACA right?
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: network dude
Well if you read the article, it goes into it, but I know you won't so I'll resummarize here. The problem is that adding plans that aren't ACA compliant will send healthy people to them because they are cheaper. This causes a death spiral in the ACA plans as only sick people are left in that pool. So prices increase drastically. Then, ultimately, we are in the same situation we were in from 2000 - 2009. With health insurance prices rising exponentially from year to year and covering less and less health issues.
Yet my family's health coverage during that span was quite affordable, skyrocketing in price only after the ACA kicked in, and it covered a hell of a lot more than it presently does. Imagine, a system where healthy people aren't financially penalized for their healthy choices and lifestyles!
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
Extorted charity is kind of like compulsory patriotism.
Is it? Americans didn't use to view it that way a century ago.
These capitalists generally act harmoniously and in concert, to fleece the people. —Abraham Lincoln, from his first speech as an Illinois state legislator, 1837
Everyone now is more or less a Socialist. —Charles Dana, managing editor of the New York Tribune, and Lincoln’s assistant secretary of war, 1848
source
Well here's the thing. I agree that the ACA shouldn't be the solution. I would rather have universal health care myself. The ACA is the conservative compromise to what I wanted. However, it IS better than the system we had before. I'd rather have it than nothing.
The government's role is to improve and protect the lives of its citizens while being limited by the Constitution.
I did no so such thing. I am merely saying that helping others is the right thing to do. Paying taxes is also mandatory and outlined in the Constitution as something the government is allowed to collect. You can look at it like robbery, but that is silly. Every government in all of history has taxed its citizens. Social programs are proven to improve the overall welfare of the citizenry. We got to be number 1 in the world by being helpful, not being hording our gains. I really have trouble understanding conservatives' aversion to Social programs.