It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Paddock. the conspiracy ideas have Begun. Assange says FBI did it! what,s your take?!

page: 2
40
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 11 2017 @ 07:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: ReadingOne

It also has a proven track record of never publishing anything embarrassing to Russia. Ever wonder why?


Never, you say..? Oh my, oh my, look at this that has very recently been published! Seems to me that there is some not so flattering info about some Russian stuff in these files....


Today, September 19th 2017, WikiLeaks starts publishing the series "Spy Files Russia" with documents from the Russian company Петер-Сервис (PETER-SERVICE). This release includes 209 documents (34 base documents in different versions) dated between 2007 and 2015


https://__._/spyfiles/russia/

(Edit, can not link directly to Wikileaks, it seems. (Why the hell not?! On a conspiracy forum, WFT!) Google for "Wikileaks + Spy Files: Russia"



Do you have any more unfounded claims about Wikileaks and/or Julian Assange to blindly throw around you?

edit on 11-10-2017 by ReadingOne because: (no reason given)




posted on Oct, 11 2017 @ 07:43 AM
link   
I'm with the MSM propagandists on this one. FBI/CIA are the "good" guys. There is only one narrative that needs following and that is Paddock was radicalized by ISIS 6 months prior to the massacre.

Ignore the other potential outcomes and all other evidence that may or may not be credible. CNN/NBC/CBS/FOX/Huffington Post/Newsweek/ Newyork Times/ BBC all have your best interests at heart.

Julian Assange is a nutcase because everyone else thinks so. Don't not defend this hacker because he's out of touch with reality etc etc....

Drink the Kool-aid peasants.



posted on Oct, 11 2017 @ 07:47 AM
link   
a reply to: freestonew

The fbi doesn't have the people to do it nor would they be the group to do it.



posted on Oct, 11 2017 @ 07:48 AM
link   
a reply to: ReadingOne

Yes, they are publishing unclassified Russian material which does not make Russia look bad. In fact, they only started doing that after I pointed out that they had no Russian materials there. (Check the release date!)


ETA: here is a direct link:

billing.ru...
edit on 11-10-2017 by DJW001 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 11 2017 @ 07:52 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

You are now suggesting that Wikileaks have started publishing Russian stuff only after YOU personally pointed out that they had no Russian material?

LMAO, the hubris!!! Anyway, good to know that there is no need to take you seriously, carry on and have fun but don't expect me to reply to you again.



posted on Oct, 11 2017 @ 07:59 AM
link   
a reply to: ReadingOne


I didn't say that, exactly. I'm not the only one who noticed that WikiLeaks never posted embarrassing things about Russia. As for Peter-Service, Russia has always prided itself on the efficiency of its secret police and intelligence services. The Tcheka is actually a character in a famous Russian opera! Oh, and something tells me you wil be responding to me a lot in future.



posted on Oct, 11 2017 @ 08:07 AM
link   
a reply to: NotTheCIA




Assange makes his money being controversial, not correct.

Not True. He makes his money by releasing documents not opinions.

So far the authenticity of his documents have not been dis-proven.

That is why the Hillary campaign tried to focus and muddy where the documents came from , rather than the information on the documents.


edit on 091031America/ChicagoWed, 11 Oct 2017 08:09:17 -0500000000p3142 by interupt42 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 11 2017 @ 08:14 AM
link   
a reply to: freestonew

here is the full Assange article...

politicalmayhem.news...

""Now, this leaves every sane individual with a number of questions left unanswered. First, if the sheriff believes it was impossible for Paddock to have acted alone, who helped him? And, second, what if the federal agents were in contact with him? Finally, why would Assange choose to tweet this information out now?

Aaron Rouse, the special agent in charge for the FBI’s Vegas investigation is likely the only one that knows the answers to the questions keeping many American up at night. He also doesn’t seem inclined to reveal them anytime soon.""

""
But there’s one troubling possibility: the FBI was involved or at least aware of Paddock prior to this incident. They could have egged him on, they could have failed to arrest him when they planned to, or they could have misread the immediacy of his intentions. Regardless, if that is the case then this tragedy could be as simple as the FBI not arresting him when they should have all because of their dirty obsession with quarterbacking terrorism.

TOGETHER WE WILL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

It is time the truth comes out on more than just this shooting. We The People are no longer willing to be complacent and silent. The Julian Assange’s of the world exist for one reason and one reason only, and that is to provide truth regardless of party lines and political affiliations. More of us should be doing that very same thing.

Truth should be sought from every direction. We know the left and the Democrats don’t have a whole lot of truth to give, and many Republicans are becoming just as bad, but we can and should be holding them all accountable to honesty in the highest sense.""

uncle freestone says......
good *grief*. yes, I agree that everything should be looked at, like for instance I would LOVE to see that note with his range calculations on it!

[does anyone here know of this note and where I can take a look at it?!]

so here is a guy who has his last lady boss tell the reporters that he was one of the most loving, caring, person she knew. when she heard about the shooting, she had a nervous breakdown! maybe something was behind Paddock, perhaps the occultists, here, might be able to shine some light on this! a demon? some darkness from the collective unconscious?!


and Assange. I wonder how many agents died due to his revealing of them?

I guess this age will soon be known as the "transparent age"! soon everything about you will be known by everyone. your bank account, your credit card, the mistress you had ten years ago....

but please...Real Transparency!

I guess drilling deep down for Ore, one also has to bring up plain old bedrock too!

freestone



posted on Oct, 11 2017 @ 08:17 AM
link   
a reply to: freestonew

If Assanage is wanting some breaks with Trump and the DOJ, he should be holding his tongue unless he has data to back it up. So this is curious on that score alone.



posted on Oct, 11 2017 @ 08:20 AM
link   
a reply to: interupt42

There does however seem to be a 'selective' leaking of documents.



posted on Oct, 11 2017 @ 09:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: bgerbger
a reply to: interupt42

There does however seem to be a 'selective' leaking of documents.


That could be debatable . However, wikileaks has leaked information against the republicans and the war in iraq in the past.

regardless if the data is being leaked selectively , the data itself is authentic as of yet.

So in an era of rampant corruption on both sides ,who cares if its selective as long as its authentic.

The fact that your team is getting picked on shouldn't dismiss the wrong doing that your team is doing.



posted on Oct, 11 2017 @ 09:11 AM
link   
My guess is that it is yet another patsy play, and another push for gun legislation, on the heels of the legislation being considered for silencers.

The "smoking gun" in my opinion (no pun intended) is the audio of the gun fire. According to reports, the main weapon used was a AR-15 with a bump stock, allowing basically automatic fire.

Here's the issue: The gun fire heard at the Vegas shooting was NOT FROM A RIFLE WITH A BUMPSTOCK. Before this video was made, I told everyone that the gun used was in fact a belt fed automatic (oddly enough, a gun that wasn't recovered at the scene). Listen to this audio comparison and decide for yourself: www.youtube.com...
edit on 11-10-2017 by dothedew because: (no reason given)


Did the FBI do it? Not sure, but I can almost guarantee that one of our 3 letter agencies pulled it off.
edit on 11-10-2017 by dothedew because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 11 2017 @ 09:17 AM
link   
a reply to: interupt42

They leaked things embarrassing to the United States while the Republicans happened to be in power. The DNC leaks were clearly intended to influence the election, or, at least, undermine Clinton if she won!



posted on Oct, 11 2017 @ 09:17 AM
link   
a reply to: ReadingOne

spoken like a gentleman



posted on Oct, 11 2017 @ 09:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: ReadingOne

It also has a proven track record of never publishing anything embarrassing to Russia. Ever wonder why?


Russia never does anything questionable or wrong. Putin is so pure! Russia is an innocent scapegoat. The Democrats made up lies because they're sore losers!



posted on Oct, 11 2017 @ 09:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: bgerbger
a reply to: freestonew

Assange is pretty much full of sh!t on this one.

Good thing the shooter wasn't a Muslim, there would be no such speculation, none at all.


Bullsh!t. 9/11 was blamed on Muslims.



posted on Oct, 11 2017 @ 09:21 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

Russia don't have anything to leak. They just tell us.



posted on Oct, 11 2017 @ 09:24 AM
link   
11 days... and still no motive. This is getting very shady no matter which way you cut it.

Rumor is there were signs that Paddock had visitors after he set up his snipers nest, and that he also had multiple burner phones in the room. If true, definitely not something normal for a "lone wolf".



posted on Oct, 11 2017 @ 09:27 AM
link   
a reply to: ReadingOne

You can jump off a bridge for all I care, what I said was accurate. Wikileaks in it's entirety is probably a psy-op. I'll emphasis this by merely bolding part of your other post.


originally posted by: ReadingOne

originally posted by: Painterz
Yeah, at this point we have to conclude that Assange is just a crazy publicity seeker, and everything he says should just be ignored.

Unless, you know, he actually comes up with some evidence for any of his claims.


Actually, "we" do not have to conclude anything of the sort, since YOU are just one single person and need to speak for yourself and yourself ONLY. You sure as hell do not speak for me.

The fact is that Wikileaks have a 10 year long perfect record of never having published anything that has been proven false or fabricated so I think it is wise to take everything that comes from Wikileaks/Assange very seriously indeed.


The fact of the matter is you're the perfect type of sucker for the Assange scam at face value.

If you can't prove me Wrong, who cares if I'm not proven Right.

It's a pretty basic charade. It's embarrassing I even have to explain it.

What's even more sad is you ask for proof of something that is very obviously a paradigm.

And to answer your stupid question, he has lied many times, mainly about when he plans on releasing things.
edit on 11-10-2017 by NotTheCIA because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 11 2017 @ 09:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: interupt42
a reply to: NotTheCIA

So far the authenticity of his documents have not been dis-proven.


Their implications have been.

Half you people can't even decided if they're talking about Pizza for lunch or Children.

The idea the documents are verifiable for anything at all with their given context is mostly stupidity.

Claims such crap is valid is partisanship in itself.
edit on 11-10-2017 by NotTheCIA because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
40
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join