posted on Dec, 18 2017 @ 03:09 PM
originally posted by: SacredLore
You, Madam (or Sir)
I see this is not your first day on the internet!
Thank you for yours as well. I think if people went back to Sekret Machines 1, and just read Tom's foreword (which by the way can be done freely on
google books), a lot of dots could be connected. Everyone laughed the book off because he wouldn't reveal any of his super sekret sources and had to
sell the book as a fiction. Even though the foreword makes it clear, this book is not a fiction book, it is a "fiction" book. I don't think people
considered the ramifications of prison terms for disclosing classified materials for those that are now out in the open working with Tom. At the time
of the first books release, most of these people still held their high level jobs. It is amazing how Tom's wild claims keep checking out. All his
secret sources, the spy masters, the senators, the leaders of aerospace - we have all their names now. In the first book, he alludes that all of these
people are real but he can't say who they are. They even seem to have cover roles as main characters in his book.
And the first book works as a great gate keeper. If you can't deal with the first book, you for sure can't work with the second book. I'm still
dealing with the second book. And I still had difficulty when Tom said he had an alloy metal he was planning on demoing for the public in the future,
a long time ago. I was convinced that was never going to be allowed to happen, and the re-emergence of that detail, including even saying who is in
possession of this special UAP metal is named in the NY Times article. I find myself asking, are they honestly really going to do that?
But then we have this forum. They could show the metal levitating, and people are going to say CGI, magnets, blah blah blah. During the TTSA live
broadcast, there were tons of stock images of air craft carriers and jets and stuff, and amidst this barrage of stock images, we get a blurry ufo type
photo which I think is whoever made the slide show just tossed it in and was not presented as evidence. Nobody made a claim that one of the tons of
images they showed were images of the events they were describing. And now that we have video and testimony about the incident they described, that
still stock UFO photo had nothing to do with it.
That was a bigger rant then I planned on. I just got excited to see someone else that has been following this, thanks for chiming in!