Las Vegas Shooting Mind Control Pop Culture Connection: Powerpuff Girls + Serenity Movie

Firefly Powerpuff and Vegas ,

Well this is stretching Alternative-Theories ad absurdum , so their value is asymptotically going to zero very fast. I'm open minded but I don't get it. I'm still at the 'was there a second shooter stage'. Reality in a simulation tends to be context based. So if we go that deep than there must be a feedback loop from the external simulated world to the internal world. Although I believe that is possible it's better to shut the EF up a bit. Look , people died and connecting PPgirls with Vegas that's pretty distastefully at this stage. Main goal now is it (if there is one) is to get the official narrative down , so I'm inclined to investigate whether there was a second shooter first and any MKultra/iluminati stuff second. One doesn't get the official narative down by talking about PowerPuff girls (yes I know could be a trigger). We not only need good conspiracy theories we also need good strategy against the MSM fake narratives... right ?

originally posted by: Ridhya
a reply to: Jefferton
He didnt say the cartoon was at all responsible, he said that it could have been used as an MK trigger, and showed a corresponding video depicting a similar occurrence.

You don't have to like it, but it's far more plausible than a man with zero military or firearms training setting up an elaborate camera system to massacre people with a ridiculous cache of firearms snuck past an unaware casino, while the man was supposedly out in his car, and the police changing their story[/url].

i'm not sure you understand the words in the phrase 'far more plausible'.

I think you are reaching very far here.

originally posted by: surnamename57

originally posted by: intrptr
Movies aren't real. People want it to be like the movies because thats what they know, what they were raised on.

Where else can they find a better, easier and homely place to make up their lack of experience?

Ummm... the real world?

If they would drop their preconceptions for a moment it would be easier...

But I get the conditioned response: "It was like a Movie".

originally posted by: intrptr

originally posted by: surnamename57

originally posted by: intrptr
Movies aren't real. People want it to be like the movies because thats what they know, what they were raised on.

Where else can they find a better, easier and homely place to make up their lack of experience?

Ummm... the real world?

If they would drop their preconceptions for a moment it would be easier...

But I get the conditioned response: "It was like a Movie".

Exactly!

a reply to: MindBodySpiritComplex Keep reaching buddy. Then seek some help please.

lolwut did I just read.

Amazing the lengths some will go to for..... um.... reasons?
Agree with the others who mentioned reaching and this being vulgar.

Also I don't think that is a reflection but an image from the other side of the glass, going by the full size photo I just googled up, appears to be people sitting on the other side watching the TV, (also the fact the power puff girls appear the correct way around instead of mirrored.) and you can also see ceiling lights.

(Edit: actually looks like an opening, not glass, guessing the ambient sun light on the photo gives the appearance of it being a glass panel.)

So if the powerpuff girls is not being watched by them, how is it influencing him more than a decade earlier?

Regardless this is some bat # crazy level of trying to make a conspiracy up.
What's sadder is some people will ignore the obvious and believe this nonsense.

Here's a link to the brother showing the whole photo, not just cherry picked parts. (and terribly picked at that when 1 second of google debunks it)

The full picture.

Coming up next, 20 year old photo showing gen 1 transformers cartoon on TV linked to JFK assassination.......because why not?

a reply to: fiverx313
I'm not sure you understand that MKUltra is real and as usual this shooting story is full of holes.

originally posted by: Jefferton

originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: MindBodySpiritComplex

haven't been able to find but in the un cropped image. but in it you can see a kid in the reflection watching it on tv.
being he was sixty and his brother doesn't appear to be to much younger, it's one of their kids watching them, anywhere from 1998 to 2005.

Shhhh rational explanations are no longer popular here.

Well, according to you, that piece of rational information should never have been shared, because according to you, its distasteful to talk about it. So, take your own advice and shut up. You sound like you don't know what youre talking about...

You said: "making a mockery of a legitimate tragedy".

What?! You're acting like the op put forth a "no victims" theory a la Sandy Hook! I don't think they are saying this is not a legitimate tragedy...

So what is so damn disrespectful about speculating perhaps the shooter were brainwashed? How does that delegitimize the tragedy?

I think maybe you just enjoy telling others how wrong and immoral they are, but what you're really actually doing when you engage in this incessant, compulsive behavior, is shouting out to anyone who will listen: "Look how righteous and moral I am!" but of course you cannot literally say That, then your obsession with reassuring yourself of your innate "goodness" constantly would be exposed for all to see. Because you keep crying out, but you're really trying to convince the one person who Won't Ever listen. Yourself.

You knew damn well there was nothing mocking, nothing disrespectful or distasteful. You wanted an easy target to, well, basically bully...

People are in here trying to have a harmless discussion in order to learn more, and you come waltzing in with your attitude, badmouthing others, and dismissing their thoughts theyve offered to share with us as "nonsense", making heinous accusations of sinister motivations with no basis in reality... It's rare i see an Actual act of bullying around here, but you, sir, are Acting Like a bully.

Edit by 3n19m470: added "Acting Like"

a reply to: 3n19m470

Think it being vulgar or in poor taste comes to context.

There is a difference between bringing up and discussing such a topic because we may learn something from it for example. Than making a topic based on it for nothing more than attention seeking, agenda pushing, making people outraged for 'teh lulz' and similar.

I mean seriously, the whole point of the OP is pretty much that the power puff girls appearing in a reflection that is not a reflection is somehow connected to a mass shooting a decade or so later.

Should of been shut down the moment the photo itself was debunked as showing what was claimed to be shown.

e.g "reflection from a computer screen in front of the two men of a power puff girls episode that they are watching and being brainwashed into being assassins" when that is clearly not the case.
Not helped by an obviously cropped photo to give the illusion and effect OP wanted.

How anyone can not see it as anything but vulgar is beyond me.
There's a reason statements like "too soon!" exist.

Especially when it's on a level such as this post is.

a reply to: AtomicKangaroo

If anyone has information which invalidates this theory, then go ahead and share it, that's cool. That's why it's good to analyze these ideas with others.

But to explore potential links with MKUltra.... especially since the motivations behind this mans acts are so unclear just as yet... where is the disrespect??

Making guesses about it being a secret influence by Islamic terrorists, by government agents, weapons dealers, liberals, etc. Is all okay, but suggesting possible connections with MKUltra is not?


You do realize that MKUltra is real? That anything at all can be used as a cue to set off certain behaviors? Anything. Even an image. Do you practice hypnosis?

If that photo is not what it looks like, then his idea falls apart , sure. But I see no reason that looking around the evidence for possible mind control influences is so disresepctful - nor needing to be limited to a certain time after the event. How much time were you thinking, by the way, before investigating motive should be started??

originally posted by: Bluesma
a reply to: AtomicKangaroo

If anyone has information which invalidates this theory, then go ahead and share it, that's cool. That's why it's good to analyze these ideas with others.

But to explore potential links with MKUltra.... especially since the motivations behind this mans acts are so unclear just as yet... where is the disrespect??

Making guesses about it being a secret influence by Islamic terrorists, by government agents, weapons dealers, liberals, etc. Is all okay, but suggesting possible connections with MKUltra is not?


You do realize that MKUltra is real? That anything at all can be used as a cue to set off certain behaviors? Anything. Even an image. Do you practice hypnosis?

If that photo is not what it looks like, then his idea falls apart , sure. But I see no reason that looking around the evidence for possible mind control influences is so disresepctful - nor needing to be limited to a certain time after the event. How much time were you thinking, by the way, before investigating motive should be started??

I am not denying its connection to MKUltra or anything like that. Not that I see any evidence in the OP of such things.
All I see is pop culture references that are claimed to be this or that because reasons.

Youtube videos of clips from movies are not proof of NWO, MKUltras or the illuminorty.

Go back and look at my earlier post, I provide the unedited image from the OP. Where it is quite clear the image is not what is claimed.

Reflection from a computer screen? It is not.
Shooter and his brother are watching it: No they are not. It is in another room behind them.

Those two things alone straight up cancel the OP's claims.

Anyways, I am not going to repeat myself and provide answers I have already provided. Maybe go back and without skipping lines, read my posts and what I have actually written, and you'll have the answers to that which you are now asking.

On the other hand, please feel free to provide me or anyone else with some reliable information that this image in OP has anything that connects it to anything even remotely like MKUltra. Preferably not more cartoon and movie clips, but you know maybe some thing like documents released under the FOIA.

Also I never said connecting it with Muslims or anything else you state is okay to connect to it, so please, and I will put it in caps to be very clear, "DON'T PUT WORDS IN MY MOUTH". thank you.

The OP goes on about Powerpuff Girls and Firefly (Or more accurately it's film Serendipity) OP and myself never mentioned the things you mention in your reply to me so they are irrelevant points to be making.

Maybe try to stay on topic instead of twisting it into what you want it to be for whatever reasons you have, nothing but the facts ma'am.
I have no time for people who wish to do such as that.

Otherwise feel free to copy and paste anywhere that I said it is okay to link such things to the shootings.
Because it shall be there for you and the whole world to see.

Honestly, if I want people taking me out of context and who will not completely read my posts before commenting on them, I would stick to facebook.

Honestly wish they'd get rid of stars and flags on this site. Tired of the bull# you gotta wade through like this because people will post anything in an attempt to earn some pixels and nothing else.

Let me get this straight.

Super powerful and obviously intelligent "deep state" government programs guy to go on a killing spree when he's triggered by a TV show.

The internet and crappy news agencies are on the same level, so they uncover the plot!

-----

Now lets talk about the fact that it appears this is just a SLIGHT coincidence between a fake commercial in a movie and a TV show. Are we to assume that these people thought it would be a good idea to make a tenuous reference to a character in a movie being triggered by watching a TV commercial that slightly resembles an actual show, just for fun?

-----

Why would you program someone to freak out over the powerpuff girls? Most grown men don't watch that. You would then have to be in control of the people writing the show, drawing the show, airing the show etc... Seems like a pretty big annoyance.

-----

We're also now assuming that the guy liked the show, which I doubt. Of course there are a lot of people that like kid's shows. I like PIXAR stuff

-----

We're also now assuming the guy wasn't just flipping through channels, that the TV wasn't just on in the background and the show they had been watching was over and this came on, that there were no children around...

-----

So I'm to believe a super secret and obviously highly intelligent group of people missed this picture, and also intentionally made a reference from the movie where a person is triggered, with a show that looks similar. I'm also supposed to think the guy actually watched the show often enough that a new episode (and it would have to be otherwise he would have been shooting people well before). I'm also supposed to believe that there wasn't a kid around, they weren't just leaving the TV on in the background, and that a large group of people in charge of producing and airing the show just went along with some shadowy organization telling them to make a specific episode.

Or I guess they just snatched him up programmed him to watch the show, then snatched him up again so he could be programmed by a certain episode.

-----

How old is that picture?

ETA:

I missed the part about Mars Attacks having anything to do with this. So now, they planned a killing based on Mars attacks with references to the powerpuff girls and Serenity? WHY?

You've pointed out coincidences. Fine. Now say WHY any of that makes sense.

a reply to: AtomicKangaroo

Reflection from a computer screen? It is not. 
Shooter and his brother are watching it: No they are not. It is in another room behind them. 

Those two things alone straight up cancel the OP's claims. 

You make a good point regarding the screen not being a reflection. I agree with your conclusion of there being a room behind them. Doesn't cancel out anything though. For one thing it seems that one of Paddocks email addresses was a VERY clear reference to PPG, which I did not include since I suspect it may violate ATS terms.

The other thing is that I see it as a synchronicity directed at those seeing this old picture nowadays. It's like the universe, the higher self, the collective subconscious, or something like that poking those of us who are open to these ideas to give a closer look.

Relevent Spanish history link "El Cid"



Less than 77 hours...

a reply to: AtomicKangaroo

If it needs to be said, I will, I apologize if I made it seem my questioning was directed solely at you.

It was questioning an idea that was expressed here by a couple of people, you happened to be the last one I read.

I was thinking anyone who held the opinion in question could have answered.

My question remains
Who is being disrespected by exploring hypotheses about why this man did this?

I went looking through the other threads which are exploring details on this case, to see if it is maybe a new popular movement -that it is now politically incorrect to speak about a case (in which people died) beyond the officially released facts (within the first six months, or something).

I found no one saying it was disrespectful to discuss the possibility of numerous shooters, of he being shot before the crowds were shot at, etc. All this other conjecture and speculation is not being objected to.

So that is why I asked - what is different from this idea?? What is the aspect that makes it disrespectful, and to whom??

-and yes, MKUltra is exactly what we are talking about when we speak of people being brainwashed and triggered with images or sounds. No, the subjects of MKUltra are not "super powerful and super intelligent deep state government agent"s (Domo) they are regular people. Some are military personel, but low ranking and not consciously aware they are being used. No superintelligence needed to be a subject of these projects.

I also have no idea where your objections of "I'm supposed to believe this...?" come from.

WHO asked you to believe anything? I read all kinds of conjecture and speculation and hypothesizing here and never feel pressured to believe any of it. I look at the idea presented, I think about it, I point any holes I see or leave it open as a possible.

It is not the pointing out of mistakes made in the construction of this idea that I question. Saying "It doesn't hold up, there is this problem with your idea_________" is what we're here for.

I just wonder why it is seen as disrespectful.


To who?

Do you have ...special feelings about this particular animated image or something..??

a reply to: Bluesma

Thank you for the polite response, apology and explanation. I am having a crap day so I'll try to comment later when I am feeling less blah and have the time to read your post properly.