Bush budget scraps 9,790 border patrol agents, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 11-2-2005 @ 02:42 AM by CazMedia
Now im all for sealing the border, but before we allow anti-Bush zeal to blind us to reality
lets look at the article,

The shrunken increase reflects the lack of money for an army of border guards and the capacity to train them, officials said.

Retired Adm. James Loy, acting head of the Department of Homeland Security until nominee Michael Chertoff takes over, said funding only 210 new agents was a "recognition that we need to balance those things as we go on down the road with other priorities."
KEY WORDS HERE

THE CAPASITY TO TRAIN THEM
If indeed there isnt a mechanisim in place to train this legion properly, then why give the agency the money to do so?...isnt that asking for this money to get somehow spent on something other than the needed border guards?

NEED TO BALANCE
as we go and vs other priorities....
Hmm this is always going to raise the question of vs what and where on the priority list...
my point here is that indeed the budget is going to be worked on as a whole by giving from one hand and putting into the other....not everything can or should be funded, of funded fully at all times.
This im sure is where tons of bickering over the merits of one program over another will occur in congress, as well as this thread.

ONCE AGAIN tho Bush bashers,
note that Bush can ask for whatever he wants on the budget as a leadership guidline
BUT
It will be CONGRESS that actually allocates the $$$ to things...

Try to cast blame where it truely lies and perhaps put preassure on your corgressional representative for buget items you feel need to be allocated or not.
Dont self delude into thinking one guy is to "blame" without willingness to include the whole picture on the budget.

Pages:     ^^TOP^^



The 51st State
  Posted 4 days ago with 3 member flags
America before the republican takeover
  Posted 14 days ago with 1 member flags