It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources. Factual Reporting: LOW Notes: Neon Nettle is an alternative and independent news source. It is also a Conspiracy and Pseudoscience website. There are many articles about aliens, New World Order, etc. Has a Pants on Fire claim with Politifact and is listed on their fake news list. Really the best way to discover this site is to actually visit it and see for yourself. I suggest a tin foil hat. (5/1/2017)
originally posted by: eXia7
originally posted by: tigertatzen
originally posted by: eXia7
Also to the people trying to use the description of the man shooting the daughter and himself in the back of the head with a shotgun isn't the way it sounds. It was poor wording.
The correct way to interpret that would be that he shot the daughter in the back of the head with the shotgun, then killed himself. Its impossible to shoot yourself in the back of the head with a shotgun.
Besides, the two events aren't even related.
In 1999, someone very dear to me was shot in the back of the head, at point blank range, and it was ruled a suicide.
It didn't matter that there were six other people with him when it happened. It didn't matter that when his body was shown for identification, there were livid bruises all over his hands and wrists, that were consistent with being forceably restrained, and were inflicted while he was still alive.
It didn't matter, because he had a record and the people who killed him were related to the sheriff. They ruled it a suicide.
Because of that, I have absolutely zero doubt that these people would indeed tell a lie like that to cover up a murder. They count on people like you to dismiss it as some fake story because of these details. The more ridiculous it sounds, the better.
Or... I can spot poor grammar a bit easier than some? The OP's original source is sketchy at best, then uses the USA Today source like its the holy grail to his topic, and the two stories aren't even related.
originally posted by: tigertatzen
originally posted by: eXia7
originally posted by: tigertatzen
originally posted by: eXia7
Also to the people trying to use the description of the man shooting the daughter and himself in the back of the head with a shotgun isn't the way it sounds. It was poor wording.
The correct way to interpret that would be that he shot the daughter in the back of the head with the shotgun, then killed himself. Its impossible to shoot yourself in the back of the head with a shotgun.
Besides, the two events aren't even related.
In 1999, someone very dear to me was shot in the back of the head, at point blank range, and it was ruled a suicide.
It didn't matter that there were six other people with him when it happened. It didn't matter that when his body was shown for identification, there were livid bruises all over his hands and wrists, that were consistent with being forceably restrained, and were inflicted while he was still alive.
It didn't matter, because he had a record and the people who killed him were related to the sheriff. They ruled it a suicide.
Because of that, I have absolutely zero doubt that these people would indeed tell a lie like that to cover up a murder. They count on people like you to dismiss it as some fake story because of these details. The more ridiculous it sounds, the better.
Or... I can spot poor grammar a bit easier than some? The OP's original source is sketchy at best, then uses the USA Today source like its the holy grail to his topic, and the two stories aren't even related.
Care to be clearer on what you're referring to? Where are you getting the "holy grail" bit from? Another member posted that link before OP did. What poor grammar was sufficient enough to make you dismiss the story?
In case you haven't noticed, grammar has taken a backseat to juicy reporting, pretty much all across the board these days. I could probably find thousands of grammatical errors in stories from all over the internet...would they invalidate every one of those stories, too? Let's see the poor grammar that told you to ignore everything else in favor of mocking the OP like that.
The stories are related, actually. By the mention in both of them of an FBI search of his home. Or did you miss that part in the USA today piece? Attacking the OP isn't going to make this go away.
originally posted by: AnonymousCitizen
2. "...used to charge a CP502520 3.0V 600mAh Li-MnO2 Non-rechargeable Thin Cell Battery" So we have here a charger for a NON-RECHAREABLE battery??!
originally posted by: Bone75
originally posted by: JinMI
Especially considering the authorities came out and said all devices and chargers have been mached...for what its worth.
Can you source that?
Earlier, senior law enforcement sources said investigators were puzzled by a charger that did not appear to match any of Paddock’s cellphones. Police have now been able to match all of the cell phone chargers found in the room with multiple cell phones that Paddock had with him.
originally posted by: smurfy
originally posted by: AnonymousCitizen
2. "...used to charge a CP502520 3.0V 600mAh Li-MnO2 Non-rechargeable Thin Cell Battery" So we have here a charger for a NON-RECHAREABLE battery??!
Battery charger for non-rechargeables kinda says it all!
originally posted by: JinMI
However, we all know that mutliple devices can match one charger.
Earlier, senior law enforcement sources said investigators were puzzled by a charger that did not appear to match any of Paddock’s cellphones.
originally posted by: Bone75
originally posted by: smurfy
originally posted by: AnonymousCitizen
2. "...used to charge a CP502520 3.0V 600mAh Li-MnO2 Non-rechargeable Thin Cell Battery" So we have here a charger for a NON-RECHAREABLE battery??!
Battery charger for non-rechargeables kinda says it all!
If it works, then who's the first person you would want to talk to?
originally posted by: tigertatzen
a reply to: eXia7
That's the second assumption in less than five minutes that I am in any way, shape or form referring to anything published by Sorcha Faal. I didn't even read that link. Silly of people to be so presumptuous. Tiresome, too.
You mentioned poor grammar. I asked for an example. You came back with everything but. Fine. Agreeing to disagree seems to be the best course of action here too. Have a lovely day.
originally posted by: Bone75
A key witness in the Las Vegas shooting massacre has killed himself and his disabled daughter in a horrific murder-suicide shortly after the FBI raided his home.
John Beilman was wanted for questioning by federal agents in connection with a communications device discovered in suspected shooter Stephen Paddock's hotel room.
source
From what I gather so far, the raid of his home in upstate NY was due to the mysterious phone charger found in Paddock's hotel room.
The charger didn't match any of the devices found in the room and in fact was a highly specialized charger used to charge military and government communication devices.
According to the article, the day after the FBI raided John Beilman's home, he wheeled his severely disabled daughter into the backyard, executed her, then shot himself in the back of the head with a shotgun.