It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump's Bored Again

page: 5
26
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 06:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Mandroid7

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: Mandroid7

originally posted by: olaru12
Trump can tweet and go to rallys and make a total fool of himself because he isn't in control anymore.
He's just an attention whore and his fan base gives it to him, that's all he cares about.

The Military is just letting Trump run his mouth. The real power is now in control and Trump aint it....



You got a link, or just bad emotional control?


Here's a thought....

do your own research...I doubt if Alex Jones and Drudge will give you the straight skinny however.




If you get past those and still back Obama, you are retarded, a traitor, a paid poster, or get your news from Facebook.



Where did you get the idea I supported Obama the neocon. Trumps a suck up to the neocons too you know...




posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 06:07 PM
link   
a reply to: Mandroid7
Ok, in that case there are no nuclear missiles pointed at the United States. Not in Russia, China, on any submarine, or anywhere. They're just pointed "up."

I feel much better now.


edit on 10/7/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 06:11 PM
link   
Federation of American Scientists

Ballistic Missile Basics



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 06:12 PM
link   
a reply to: olaru12

I assumed, by the amount of anti-Trump posts you author, that you are democrat.

If not, my bad

Carry on



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 06:12 PM
link   
Maybe

Missiles targeting the US mainland...



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 06:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: subfab

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: subfab
a reply to: whywhynot

we defend
we do not attack


We defend against nuke missiles pointed at us by a madman, you are correct. Take his missiles away either the easy way by getting him to agree to abandon them or the easier way, press a few buttons and his whole nation goes boom taking them off the table.


how many other nations have missles pointed at the u.s.?
using this logic we should bomb most of the nuclear capable nations on the planet.


None that have officially said they will blast them off on the US and Japan, have launched missiles over Japan, tested their latest nuke and threatened to do an atmospheric blast in the Pacific, all in the last few months. NK has set themselves apart but that is inconvenient for your narrative.


no narrative here.
every nuclear capable nation has performed these tests.
here is a list of nuclear tests performed by the united states:
wiki page listing nuke tests by U.S.

quote from the link:



The United States conducted around 1,054 nuclear tests by official count, including 216 atmospheric, underwater, and space tests.[1]



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 06:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Mandroid7
Ok, in that case there are no nuclear missiles pointed at the United States. Not in Russia, China, on any submarine, or anywhere. They're just pointed "up."

I feel much better now.



Yeah, it was kind of an argument to the point of we are not being directly targeted right now.
A poster stated they are all aimed at us.

It's like the difference between a holstered gun and one aimed at someone.



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 06:20 PM
link   
a reply to: SilverOwls

No Way . President Trump is MORE Entertaining than Hollywood and the MSM put Together . If he's Bored , We are Interested !



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 06:27 PM
link   
a reply to: Mandroid7

You think that the trajectories are not set?
That the missiles will be programmed...later?
edit on 10/7/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 06:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deny Arrogance
a reply to: odzeandennz

Oh just little things like Clinton's agreement to allow them to develop nuclear power as long as they never developed nuclear weapons with it.





Remarks on the Nuclear Agreement With North Korea
October 18, 1994

Good afternoon. I am pleased that the United States and North Korea yesterday reached agreement on the text of a framework document on North Korea's nuclear program. This agreement will help to achieve a longstanding and vital American objective: an end to the threat of nuclear proliferation on the Korean Peninsula...


www.presidency.ucsb.edu...


Then Bush came along invading Iraq and Afghanistan while also not working to reup the Deal Clinton made...



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 06:42 PM
link   
Wasn't it Steve Bannon who said the preemptive option couldn't be on the table because millions of south koreans would die?
www.washingtonpost.com - Bannon is right about North Korea...

By publicly declaring that the U.S. threat of military force in North Korea is a bluff, Bannon may have undermined the credibility of that threat. He may also have nudged the United States toward a more diplomacy-focused approach and reduced the risk of war.


“There’s no military solution [to North Korea’s nuclear threats], forget it,” Bannon told the American Prospect. “Until somebody solves the part of the equation that shows me that 10 million people in Seoul don’t die in the first 30 minutes from conventional weapons, I don’t know what you’re talking about, there’s no military solution here, they got us.”


“They figured out a long time ago the U.S. isn’t going to do anything,” he said. “Bannon may have undermined our pressure campaign, but the threat of military force has been a diminishing tool all along.”

I wonder if that reason among others caused him to leave the administration. Are him and Trump still on good terms?
edit on 10/7/2017 by jonnywhite because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 06:43 PM
link   
a reply to: Pyle Of what?



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 06:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: subfab
a reply to: SilverOwls

every nation has the right to defend its people.
whether it is with military, diplomacy, or nuclear, the responsibility of the government is to protect the people.

the u.s. has a history of removing leaders from sovereign nations, disrupting their economy, and placing leaders in place who are supportive of the u.s. can anyone really blame north korea or iran or any nation to want to have the tools to defend themselves from the u.s. war machine?

diplomacy and economic relations would better serve the world.

no more war.


Do they also have the right to sell nukes to any country that wants them no matter how unstable?

Do they have the right to use their nukes to blackmail others for financial gain?

Cause North Korea is doing and has shown the desire to do both. Not to mention starve ,enslave and kill millions of its own citizens.

If you really think North Korea is equivalent to France, the U.K. Or Israel you are severely ignoring the true threat they are to the world.



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 06:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: olaru12

Our president is in full control. Keep listening to the lefty loonies though. They're idiots and have absolutely no clue, which is probably why they are so frustrated and making sh** up and quoting "sources close to the situation". Ha ha!!


He's not my president...I'm taking a cue from the conservative haters. You reap what you sow!!




Silly Republicrat's.




posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 06:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: SilverOwls
Trump loves his weekend Twittering. Gene Wilder's spiritual hair twin is busily trying to provoke a war again. MAGA!



Please. Someone. Anyone. Take his Twitter account away.




Why? Is he losing it? Or, is he gearing up to put that American fight forth?



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 07:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
Anyone else think that Trumps twitter account is probably the biggest threat to global security right now.


No, the biggest threat to global security right now is not Trumps tweets - it's folks' reactions to Trumps tweets coupled with main stream media, facebook, google and the US political establishment who would rather let the country burn than see Trump holding the reigns.

...since we're sharing opinions 'n all.



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 07:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: proximo

originally posted by: subfab
a reply to: SilverOwls

every nation has the right to defend its people.
whether it is with military, diplomacy, or nuclear, the responsibility of the government is to protect the people.

the u.s. has a history of removing leaders from sovereign nations, disrupting their economy, and placing leaders in place who are supportive of the u.s. can anyone really blame north korea or iran or any nation to want to have the tools to defend themselves from the u.s. war machine?

diplomacy and economic relations would better serve the world.

no more war.


Do they also have the right to sell nukes to any country that wants them no matter how unstable?

Do they have the right to use their nukes to blackmail others for financial gain?

Cause North Korea is doing and has shown the desire to do both. Not to mention starve ,enslave and kill millions of its own citizens.

If you really think North Korea is equivalent to France, the U.K. Or Israel you are severely ignoring the true threat they are to the world.


can you post links to cite the statements you just made?
and the only true threat to the world has been the u.s.
list of countries invaded by the united states:
list of countries invaded by date

note: the u.s. has used military action against its own citizens.



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 07:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sublimecraft

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
Anyone else think that Trumps twitter account is probably the biggest threat to global security right now.


No, the biggest threat to global security right now is not Trumps tweets - it's folks' reactions to Trumps tweets coupled with main stream media, facebook, google and the US political establishment who would rather let the country burn than see Trump holding the reigns.

...since we're sharing opinions 'n all.


I'm not sure that's the case, except by one slant.

The other is, there appears to be another threat of preemptive war, and an assault on liberty at home, which is trying to be prevented.



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 07:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sublimecraft

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
Anyone else think that Trumps twitter account is probably the biggest threat to global security right now.


No, the biggest threat to global security right now is not Trumps tweets - it's folks' reactions to Trumps tweets coupled with main stream media, facebook, google and the US political establishment who would rather let the country burn than see Trump holding the reigns.

...since we're sharing opinions 'n all.


ahhh right so the media just shouldn't report on the stupid stuff Trump tweets and that negates the risk his stupid tweets cause.

Got it



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 07:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin

originally posted by: Sublimecraft

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
Anyone else think that Trumps twitter account is probably the biggest threat to global security right now.


No, the biggest threat to global security right now is not Trumps tweets - it's folks' reactions to Trumps tweets coupled with main stream media, facebook, google and the US political establishment who would rather let the country burn than see Trump holding the reigns.

...since we're sharing opinions 'n all.



ahhh right so the media just shouldn't report on the stupid stuff Trump tweets and that negates the risk his stupid tweets cause.

Got it


You will see!

edit on 110CDT07America/Chicago01170731 by InTheLight because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
26
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join