It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump's Bored Again

page: 4
26
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 05:17 PM
link   
a reply to: TinfoilTP




Take his missiles away either the easy way by getting him to agree to abandon them or the easier way, press a few buttons and his whole nation goes boom taking them off the table.

And up to 25.000,000 North Koreans killed , plus the prospect of war with China and Russia , those stakes are too high for me.

Why would anyone give up their main defence when an enemy is at the door ?, it's a failed strategy.




posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 05:17 PM
link   
a reply to: olaru12

Our president is in full control. Keep listening to the lefty loonies though. They're idiots and have absolutely no clue, which is probably why they are so frustrated and making sh** up and quoting "sources close to the situation". Ha ha!!



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 05:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: Mandroid7

originally posted by: olaru12
Trump can tweet and go to rallys and make a total fool of himself because he isn't in control anymore.
He's just an attention whore and his fan base gives it to him, that's all he cares about.

The Military is just letting Trump run his mouth. The real power is now in control and Trump aint it....



You got a link, or just bad emotional control?


Here's a thought....

do your own research...I doubt if Alex Jones and Drudge will give you the straight skinny however.
edit on 7-10-2017 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 05:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: subfab

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: subfab
a reply to: whywhynot

we defend
we do not attack


We defend against nuke missiles pointed at us by a madman, you are correct. Take his missiles away either the easy way by getting him to agree to abandon them or the easier way, press a few buttons and his whole nation goes boom taking them off the table.


how many other nations have missles pointed at the u.s.?
using this logic we should bomb most of the nuclear capable nations on the planet.


None that have officially said they will blast them off on the US and Japan, have launched missiles over Japan, tested their latest nuke and threatened to do an atmospheric blast in the Pacific, all in the last few months. NK has set themselves apart but that is inconvenient for your narrative.



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 05:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: subfab

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: subfab
a reply to: whywhynot

we defend
we do not attack


We defend against nuke missiles pointed at us by a madman, you are correct. Take his missiles away either the easy way by getting him to agree to abandon them or the easier way, press a few buttons and his whole nation goes boom taking them off the table.


how many other nations have missles pointed at the u.s.?


using this logic we should bomb most of the nuclear capable nations on the planet.


Standing your ground is not mean
And you don't "point" a missle. It can turn mid air with its wings like a bird or a plane

edit on 10 by Mandroid7 because: added

edit on 10 by Mandroid7 because: format



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 05:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: olaru12

Our president is in full control. Keep listening to the lefty loonies though. They're idiots and have absolutely no clue, which is probably why they are so frustrated and making sh** up and quoting "sources close to the situation". Ha ha!!



He's not my president...I'm taking a cue from the conservative haters. You reap what you sow!!


edit on 7-10-2017 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 05:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: TinfoilTP




Take his missiles away either the easy way by getting him to agree to abandon them or the easier way, press a few buttons and his whole nation goes boom taking them off the table.

And up to 25.000,000 North Koreans killed , plus the prospect of war with China and Russia , those stakes are too high for me.

Why would anyone give up their main defence when an enemy is at the door ?, it's a failed strategy.


Their main defense is staying in good graces with China while they man their artillery pointed at the millions of innocents in S Korea. They have zero need for nukes, they are not a defense they are a global instability in NK.



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 05:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Mandroid7




And you don't "point" a missle. It can turn mid air with its wings like a bird or a plane

Perhaps you should research the term "ballistic". That's the "B" in ICBM.



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 05:24 PM
link   
a reply to: olaru12

Fine. He's not your president. Got it. You can take a knee when he walks to the podium then, with the rest of the marxist leftists.



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 05:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: subfab

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: subfab
a reply to: whywhynot

we defend
we do not attack


We defend against nuke missiles pointed at us by a madman, you are correct. Take his missiles away either the easy way by getting him to agree to abandon them or the easier way, press a few buttons and his whole nation goes boom taking them off the table.


how many other nations have missles pointed at the u.s.?
using this logic we should bomb most of the nuclear capable nations on the planet.


None that have officially said they will blast them off on the US and Japan, have launched missiles over Japan, tested their latest nuke and threatened to do an atmospheric blast in the Pacific, all in the last few months. NK has set themselves apart but that is inconvenient for your narrative.


except Trump has on a world stage threatened to wipe them off the planet, 'totally destroyed NK'. and not to mention the only nation to use the h-bomb in war, not as a last resort, without unilateral consent, is the same nation with the second highest nuke stockpile and has nuke warheads active on subs 'patrolling' the edges of foreign enemy waters.

logistically, if NK wants to test a missile by landing it in the pacific, it must go over Japan to do so, as japan lies directly between the two.



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 05:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: odzeandennz

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: subfab

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: subfab
a reply to: whywhynot

we defend
we do not attack


We defend against nuke missiles pointed at us by a madman, you are correct. Take his missiles away either the easy way by getting him to agree to abandon them or the easier way, press a few buttons and his whole nation goes boom taking them off the table.


how many other nations have missles pointed at the u.s.?
using this logic we should bomb most of the nuclear capable nations on the planet.


None that have officially said they will blast them off on the US and Japan, have launched missiles over Japan, tested their latest nuke and threatened to do an atmospheric blast in the Pacific, all in the last few months. NK has set themselves apart but that is inconvenient for your narrative.


except Trump has on a world stage threatened to wipe them off the planet, 'totally destroyed NK'. and not to mention the only nation to use the h-bomb in war, not as a last resort, without unilateral consent, is the same nation with the second highest nuke stockpile and has nuke warheads active on subs 'patrolling' the edges of foreign enemy waters.

logistically, if NK wants to test a missile by landing it in the pacific, it must go over Japan to do so, as japan lies directly between the two.


It's good that Trump has said these things, brute force is the only thing dictators understand after taking your money for decades and getting no results.



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 05:33 PM
link   
a reply to: TinfoilTP

Does anyone have a need for nukes ?
As a weapon it seems pretty ineffective if you can't use it , and let's face it you can't use it.

Building and maintaining them keeps people in jobs though I guess.



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 05:34 PM
link   
a reply to: gortex




Does anyone have a need for nukes ?

As long as someone anyone has them, I suppose the answer is yes.

www.vox.com...
edit on 10/7/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 05:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: Mandroid7

originally posted by: olaru12
Trump can tweet and go to rallys and make a total fool of himself because he isn't in control anymore.
He's just an attention whore and his fan base gives it to him, that's all he cares about.

The Military is just letting Trump run his mouth. The real power is now in control and Trump aint it....



You got a link, or just bad emotional control?


Here's a thought....

do your own research...I doubt if Alex Jones and Drudge will give you the straight skinny however.


Do the research yourself child.

You can start with the Smith-Mundt act, maybe end with the Electronic Privacy Act removal.

If you get through those, youtube the recent video with the Demorats openly talking gun bans.

If you get past those and still back Obama, you are retarded, a traitor, a paid poster, or get your news from Facebook.



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 05:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: SilverOwls
Trump loves his weekend Twittering. Gene Wilder's spiritual hair twin is busily trying to provoke a war again. MAGA!



Please. Someone. Anyone. Take his Twitter account away.




Is he wrong.

I hate every time a talking head gets on the media and says "I was big shoot number 3 in the past guys administration and what Trump is doing is crazy, we would never have acted this way under our rule. What we need is to try deplomicy and XYZ"

Why didn't you do that when the other guy was in power and you where the number 3 big shoot? ... Oh yea you did and it didn't work.



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 05:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

What is your point Phage?

Or are you just here to are condescendingly telling me what I just said?

They are not literally pointed at us, they are "steered"



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 05:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Mandroid7




They are not literally pointed at us, they are "steered"

Aimed, actually. If you want to be pedantic.

Which means what, to you?

edit on 10/7/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 05:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: DanDanDat

originally posted by: SilverOwls
Trump loves his weekend Twittering. Gene Wilder's spiritual hair twin is busily trying to provoke a war again. MAGA!



Please. Someone. Anyone. Take his Twitter account away.




Is he wrong.

I hate every time a talking head gets on the media and says "I was big shoot number 3 in the past guys administration and what Trump is doing is crazy, we would never have acted this way under our rule. What we need is to try deplomicy and XYZ"

Why didn't you do that when the other guy was in power and you where the number 3 big shoot? ... Oh yea you did and it didn't work.



He is wrong. Only the Clinton administration attempted any serious talks with the DPRK. And they were really on the road to achieving something.

Trump is just continuing the ridiculous hardliner policy set by Bush and carried on by Obama.

Incidentially Bush Jr intentionally destroyed a decade of diplomacy with the DPRK causing them to resume serious work on their missile and weapons development program.



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 06:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Mandroid7




They are not literally pointed at us, they are "steered"

Aimed, actually. If you want to be pedantic.

Which means what, to you?


It means nothing Phage.

I said they aren't literally pointed at us. You know, like a gun barrel?

What are you missing, or even arguing now?



posted on Oct, 7 2017 @ 06:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: odzeandennz

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: subfab

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: subfab
a reply to: whywhynot

we defend
we do not attack


We defend against nuke missiles pointed at us by a madman, you are correct. Take his missiles away either the easy way by getting him to agree to abandon them or the easier way, press a few buttons and his whole nation goes boom taking them off the table.


how many other nations have missles pointed at the u.s.?
using this logic we should bomb most of the nuclear capable nations on the planet.


None that have officially said they will blast them off on the US and Japan, have launched missiles over Japan, tested their latest nuke and threatened to do an atmospheric blast in the Pacific, all in the last few months. NK has set themselves apart but that is inconvenient for your narrative.


except Trump has on a world stage threatened to wipe them off the planet, 'totally destroyed NK'. and not to mention the only nation to use the h-bomb in war, not as a last resort, without unilateral consent, is the same nation with the second highest nuke stockpile and has nuke warheads active on subs 'patrolling' the edges of foreign enemy waters.

logistically, if NK wants to test a missile by landing it in the pacific, it must go over Japan to do so, as japan lies directly between the two.


Lies.

President Trump never threatened to wipe them off the planet.

You have that ass-backwards.

Rocketman is the one who threatened to wipe the US of the face of the earth after the President said he would totally destroy NK....economically.



new topics

top topics



 
26
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join