It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Jonjonj
As far as I am concerned Trump should say no just on principle. Release it later to people who deserve to know. Democrats...they got me mad right now!!!
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: FyreByrd
I really like the people of both major parties coming together aspect of this story. I would have flagged and starred you if you hadn't called Trump 'orange one'.
originally posted by: tinner07
unless the President upholds an agency appeal and “certifies” that releasing a record would cause specific harm.
They concluded That Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. So how could any of the investigative papers cause harm? Unless they found links to Oswald and others maybe in the Gov't so if they do not release all documents it pretty much clears up the mystery that they are hiding something
I.B. Scientific acoustical evidence establishes a high probability that two gunmen fired at President John F. Kennedy.
Other scientific evidence does not preclude the possibility of two gunmen firing at the President.
Scientific evidence negates some specific conspiracy allegations.
I.C. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy.
The committee was unable to identify the other gunmen or the extent of the conspiracy
President Trump said today that he intends to allow the release of long-classified files on the assassination of former President John F. Kennedy, a move that could shed light on a tragedy that has stirred conspiracy theories for decades.