It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Michelle Obama Slams ‘All White, All Men’ GOP

page: 3
48
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 4 2017 @ 05:50 PM
link   
a reply to: face23785

Well you don't have to get all snippy lmao. Let's not act like Jewish and women are not minorities and not big in the republican party.




posted on Oct, 4 2017 @ 05:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: thesaneone

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: thesaneone

LOL ... as you post another zero-content whine .. .

Can't make this up.



Your just too easy.


Yeah, I use proper grammar too ... mean ol' elitist me.

Get a life.



posted on Oct, 4 2017 @ 05:52 PM
link   
I cant watch video now, is there a transcript?

I think Michelle is attractive, not that it matters.

I also think she is very intelligent and a great speaker, perhaps better than Obama who was also very good.

I am not a fan of her politics though.

If she said what the op claims, it is a really dumb and uncalled for.



posted on Oct, 4 2017 @ 05:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: face23785
a reply to: conspiracy nut

Does that make neither of them rich, old and white? Because that's what I said.

FYI Jewish is a religion.


Judaism is a religion.

Jewish is an ethnocultural group.


+4 more 
posted on Oct, 4 2017 @ 05:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Wow, another thread that will net flags and stars based only on the title.

I think it's funny that now you guys have a young, beautiful, brilliant Black Woman to be afraid of who has NONE of the baggage of Hillary Clinton.

I wonder if she's formed a PAC yet ... I'll have to go donate money just to help her keep evoking the hysteria.

LOL



She speaks about white men like a klansman speaks about black people.


originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: xuenchen

So we went from "content of character" to "we need more people based on color/gender".

Dear gods, we are going backwards.

That's why we call them Regressives.
edit on 4-10-2017 by HeadCrunchMcRockGroin because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 4 2017 @ 05:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: xuenchen

So we went from "content of character" to "we need more people based on color/gender".

Dear gods, we are going backwards.


Please don’t act like the political establishment have ever been selected for their content of character...

That’s just a load of bullsh*t.
Especially when considering the anti-freedom GOP.


Well. . . once. . . . . "I had a dream". . . .




A non sequitur? For what reason?

MLK wasn’t “political establishment”...

He was of much finer stock as a human being.



posted on Oct, 4 2017 @ 05:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: badw0lf

originally posted by: Gryphon66


a young, beautiful, brilliant Black Woman



who?


Keep up. Your hint is in the thread title.

Come on ... I bet you can figure it out if you try.


No really. the topic is michelle obama. Who are you referring to?

literally scratching my head...



posted on Oct, 4 2017 @ 05:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Wow, another thread that will net flags and stars based only on the title.

I think it's funny that now you guys have a young, beautiful, brilliant Black Woman to be afraid of who has NONE of the baggage of Hillary Clinton.

I wonder if she's formed a PAC yet ... I'll have to go donate money just to help her keep evoking the hysteria.

LOL



a reply to: Gryphon66

No baggage? Being the wife of the "messiah" I'd say she has already has far more baggage than most who run for office. She has a long, well documented, history of racially charged comments not to mention disparaging comments about the nation itself. To be honest I hope she does run for president as I'd honestly enjoy another epic campaign failure for the "progressive" left.
edit on 4-10-2017 by Nucleardoom because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 4 2017 @ 05:57 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

I'd rather be hung on a stake upside down watching re-runs of The Nanny than endure that.



posted on Oct, 4 2017 @ 05:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: whywhynot
Got a little way into the video and felt some vomit coming up so I had to go.

Terrible horrible mean ugly woman.


She's a transvestite originally by the name of Michael.

Very attractive woman, for a man.



posted on Oct, 4 2017 @ 05:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler


I think Michelle is attractive, not that it matters.


I think that's what you would call a Man Crush.



posted on Oct, 4 2017 @ 05:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: xuenchen

So we went from "content of character" to "we need more people based on color/gender".

Dear gods, we are going backwards.


Please don’t act like the political establishment have ever been selected for their content of character...

That’s just a load of bullsh*t.
Especially when considering the anti-freedom GOP.


Well. . . once. . . . . "I had a dream". . . .




A non sequitur? For what reason?

MLK wasn’t “political establishment”...

He was of much finer stock as a human being.


I agree. And as a society, we have shat on his legacy.



posted on Oct, 4 2017 @ 05:59 PM
link   
haha

love the pent up aggression

#ing Cake.



posted on Oct, 4 2017 @ 06:00 PM
link   
Just being a little above these failed, barbaric states is no big thing. I would not feel too good about just being a little better than these countries…

Oh it’s a crime if black people even talk about race to some.

Somebody should deal with the issue once in a while, why not.

To brush it under the rug doesn’t solve anything.

It’s a fact that the GOP has been trying their best to suppress the black vote in many southern states even the courts and SCOTUS has said that

That’s called racism



posted on Oct, 4 2017 @ 06:02 PM
link   
a reply to: Nucleardoom

OH you mean the President who left with the highest approval rating in modern Presidential history?

Lol be careful what you wish for ...
edit on 4-10-2017 by Gryphon66 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 4 2017 @ 06:03 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Yep, instead of striving towards "I have a dream...", seems we're, as a whole, all too willing to walk, nay run, away from it, towards "I have a nightmare...". Or somethin' like that.

More to be gained, apparently, through politics of division and strife.

Neither Dems, nor Reps, have a monopoly on it, it would seem.



posted on Oct, 4 2017 @ 06:07 PM
link   
Ka reply to: HeadCrunchMcRockGroin

Nah ... Say what you'd like to say ... "She just gettin all uppity."



posted on Oct, 4 2017 @ 06:08 PM
link   
a reply to: seagull

It's why I blame society as a whole instead of any political ideology.



posted on Oct, 4 2017 @ 06:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: SleepyDude
a reply to: Middleoftheroad

People usually hate what they can't have. In Michael's case, Manhood.


Haha Michael fits better, good call.



posted on Oct, 4 2017 @ 06:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Hazardous1408

Isn't that kind of the point?

Our supposed, and I use the term loosely, leaders should be trying to drag us, kicking and screaming if necessary, towards that dream...



Seems we've forgotten it...again. Or is it still?



new topics

top topics



 
48
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join