It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Michelle Obama Slams ‘All White, All Men’ GOP

page: 16
48
<< 13  14  15    17  18 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 6 2017 @ 02:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: DonInHtown
Woman??? a reply to: Gryphon66



Nope.




posted on Oct, 6 2017 @ 02:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Wardaddy454

Always good to hear from a fan.


There's that narcissism.

No wonder you project onto Trump


LOL .. I have nothing on Trump when it comes to narcissism. And folks like you keep missing the point that your opinions about me asa person are silly and off-topic.

Slow learners.



posted on Oct, 6 2017 @ 05:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
And the rich, the truly rich, are richer than EVER ... and the rest of us are fighting over the scraps.

That's how They like it.

Not going to change as long as the left has the divisive mentality of going against white people. Example, by who else;


originally posted by: Gryphon66
No rational person can say that White males (usually in the 1%) don't have 99% of the control in this country.

Divisive BS that has no place if your goal is truly for all of us to "be equals" or to put a stop to the huge wage gap increase between the middle class and the elites.

It's BS like this that tried to paint anyone who opposed Obama as a racist who is uncomfortable with a black man in power. Reality is that most of the people who are against him would be against him even if he was a blonde white. Identity politics are more of a thing for the left, example; "TRUMP IS A WHITE SUPREMACIST".

Anywho... These white males who are in the 1% more often than not, don't represent my view on anything, politically, socially etc. They do not pass their privilege to me or to other middle class white men - they often try to silence us, even.
I will bet that there are more left leaning "rich old white men" in power in the US than right leaning.
These elite rich old white men also don't give white middle class citizens extra benefits, or strip blacks of theirs, only because of their color.

US will never be a unified state as long as you, and your fellow divisive leftists will realize that equality will never come this way. Until then, have fun sparking civil wars with your divisive rhetoric.

Hard for me to imagine you are going to take this post seriously as you are seemingly all about spamming threads you don't like with garbage nonsense in the form of "LOL YOU ARE AFRAID OF MICHELLE".

TL;DR - Democrats are the ones obsessed about race and are usually the ones pretending to be for 'unification'.
edit on 6-10-2017 by 1337Kph because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 6 2017 @ 07:51 AM
link   
a reply to: 1337Kph

Ah ... I see you begin by hacking up all the standard buzzwords and catch-phrases ..

"*hack* Left *cough* divisive *cough cough* BS *cough hack cough*"

Glad you got all that out of your system right off.

Sadly, in doing so, you're still playing identity politics, just what you've been fed from the right-wing media, that performs the fairly ridiculous inversion of blaming Blacks for discriminating against Whites. Sure, "reverse" discrimination happens, and anyone can be racist. There really is no comparison, however, on a cultural level, between the way minorities in this country have been treated and what White people are supposedly "going through" now.

If you, as a middle-class White man have been damaged, it has not been by Blacks, or Hispanics or Women ... it's been by that very 1% you seem to want to obliquely protect. It's really not even appropriate to speak of a "middle class" anymore, as we are all (White, Black, Brown, etc.) being reduced to poverty so that the rich can keep getting richer.

That was UKTruth's point which I agree with to an extent.

You may not agree with the 1% of White males in power, but you apparently have consumed enough of the media KoolAid to believe that your interests are best represented by the party that openly promotes, supports, and sustains the power of the 1% the most ... the Republican party.

However, even that is not the complete truth, because as one digs down beneath the shallow sand tossed over the top, the red sand and the blue sand ... you find out that all politicians are in this unsurprisingly FOR THEMSELVES AND THEIR OWN INTERESTS.

Folks like you that buy the nonsense that to point out our continuing problems in this country with equality by race, sex, gender, etc. is to create the divide that already exists are really doing nothing more than sucking up to the 1% of "old white men" that snap the lash over your back while you smile and try to convince yourself that you're really not like the ones you're told to blame.

TS; DR: Always good to hear from a fan.




posted on Oct, 6 2017 @ 08:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Sadly, in doing so, you're still playing identity politics

Pointing out identity politics is playing identity politics. Ooookay.


If you, as a middle-class White man have been damaged, it has not been by Blacks, or Hispanics or Women ... it's been by that very 1% you seem to want to obliquely protect.

I'm not white, not middle class, not even a US citizen, and I'm hardly protecting the 1% and would love for you to quote me and show me where I have. Hint: save your efforts.


It's really not even appropriate to speak of a "middle class" anymore, as we are all (White, Black, Brown, etc.) being reduced to poverty so that the rich can keep getting richer.

That is my point exactly, and furthermore I'm suggesting the radical notion that blaming all of society's ills on whiteness is not helpful to anyone's causes besides the ones who are the 1% or those that their jobs are to protect the status quo. That would be online shills, lobbyists etc. You are acting as one.

The equivalent radical behavior from a right leaning person would be to blame the Jews, not whites. That is why I'm disgusted by both extremes, though in the last decade the extreme right wing has done very little harm compared to the extreme left.


You may not agree with the 1% of White males in power, but you apparently have consumed enough of the media KoolAid to believe that your interests are best represented by the party that openly promotes, supports, and sustains the power of the 1% the most ... the Republican party.

Not even a fan of the Republican party, but I see they have the countries' interests at core level, where-as Democrats nowdays seem to be hell-bent on globalism, socialism and everything that turns a successful country into a failed waste of land.
Also, you have got to be kidding me to even suggest the Democrats are not playing this game too. Just wait until the Awan case is done
even CNN is going to be all over it, and I will happily have you hold me to my word. I know things most don't, not to brag.


However, even that is not the complete truth, because as one digs down beneath the shallow sand tossed over the top, the red sand and the blue sand ... you find out that all politicians are in this unsurprisingly FOR THEMSELVES AND THEIR OWN INTERESTS.

It's amusing how you seem to think you're letting me in on some ultra secret truth. You claim to know that, yet you insist to pick the wrong enemies. Whites have done nothing to you as a race, if you were born in the last 3 generations.


Folks like you that buy the nonsense that to point out our continuing problems in this country with equality by race, sex, gender, etc. is to create the divide that already exists are really doing nothing more than sucking up to the 1% of "old white men" that snap the lash over your back while you smile and try to convince yourself that you're really not like the ones you're told to blame.

That's the stupidest statement I've read lately. Because I'm not buying into the whole new age "EQUALITY 4 EVERYONE!!11" horse crap I'm supporting the 1%? Lol, way to out yourself.

Funny enough, current world's elites and top corporations hold globalist agendas (I wonder why, cheap labor comes to mind) and opinions similar to your's.
...Yet... They are old white men, so the blame obviously lies on white society on a cultural level.
For someone claiming to "uncover sand" and not drink the media's koolaid, you have an interestingly similar opinions to the 1% you so oppose.

Hardly a fan. Only thing I remember coming out of you is outright mocking anyone who suggests Trump has a chance against Hillary, only to be filled with unimaginable amounts of salt later on.

Non quoted parts hardly matter or worth addressing.
edit on 6-10-2017 by 1337Kph because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 6 2017 @ 09:20 AM
link   
a reply to: 1337Kph

In rough order of your cutting and pasting ... as I'm not quite as desperate as you seem to be ...


1. Your claim was that pointing out pointing out division is divisive. /shrug

2. You're not? That must be why I prefaced my statement with "IF" ... one wonders what you're crying about then.

3. No one is blaming all of societies ills on "whiteness" ... I did make the clear observation that White people in the United States at least have been and are in control of most facets of society.

4. I'm acting as a shill because YOU don't agree with me? I see logic isn't your strong suite.

5. Your equation of the way anti-semitics treat Jews with the way that oppressed peoples speak of their oppressors is telling. Particularly in your attempts to be seen as "in the middle."

6. The Republicans have US interests at heart whereas Democrats don't? You just can't help tipping your hand, can you?

7. Blatta blatta blah. Do us all a favor; skip over my posts as I'll be skipping over yours.









edit on 6-10-2017 by Gryphon66 because: Noted



posted on Oct, 6 2017 @ 09:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
In rough order of your cutting and pasting ... as I'm not quite as desperate as you seem to be ...

I'm so hurt by that insult I think I just might not reply. Not.
Also funny that a person with 20+ posts in this thread alone says I'm desperate for quoting in a proper way. Lol.


No one is blaming all of societies ills on "whiteness" ... I did make the clear observation that White people in the United States at least have been and are in control of most facets of society.

Nah, elites and rich people in general are in control. I don't see white people getting special treatment at work places, at the academia, in the military or in the government. I do see however that when whites are open about being Republican, they are automatically considered the lowest of low, ultimate garbage, worse than Hitler.
Mostly, the old white men who are in control of "most facets of society" are the ones with strong anti-white sentiments and general appeal to globalism. Cheap labor.


I'm acting as a shill because YOU don't agree with me? I see logic isn't your strong suite.

You're acting as a shill because of your consistency to derail threads while pitifully attempting to mock other people for not having the same opinions as you do.
You're also acting as a shill for obvious misinformation, fact twisting and mental gymnastics attempts.
Not saying you're a shill, I know shills. You're obviously not getting paid.



Your equation of the way anti-semitics treat Jews with the way that oppressed peoples speak of their oppressors is telling. Particularly in your attempts to be seen as "in the middle."

Allow me to be bold;
Liberals (radical) treat the elite as if it symbolizes white supremacy.
Right wingers (radical) treat the elite as if it symbolizes the Jew.

Not even attempting to be seen "in the middle", thanks for projecting though, seems I come across this way. I have literally wrote that I prefer the "extreme right" side over the "extreme left", seeing as the extreme right has done little to no damage to society as of lately where-as the extreme left is anxious to tear the fabrics of society apart.


The Republicans have US interests at heart whereas Democrats don't? You just can't help tipping your hand, can you?

Would love knowing what that meant. More projecting?



Blatta blatta blah. Do us all a favor; skip over my posts as I'll be skipping over yours.

Nope.
edit on 6-10-2017 by 1337Kph because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 6 2017 @ 09:48 AM
link   
Ho hum.

Anyone have anything else to cry about Michelle Obama about? Surely you guys haven't already exhausted yourselves?



posted on Oct, 6 2017 @ 09:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: Gandalf77


i'd vote for michelle! i think she's great. she's hands down 100% better than what we got. lol




Maybe you'll get your chance. Contact your local DNC office and push the idea. I think Michelle is proud of America still.


If she ever loses an election, she won't be so proud.





Yeah, that's supposed to take the uppity right out of those darn females, ain't it Xuench.

Is that you Archie Bunker?
You are the only member using the word "uppity". Are you 75 or just trolling?


I'm just using the word so many of you want to use ... but can't bring yourselves to.

Especially you, Cleopatra.

lol
You don't even know what YOU want, let alone other members here.
Thank you for again highlighting what is wrong with you people.
You DO NOT always know what is best for OTHERS, and would be much better served looking out for your selves.
It never fails to amaze me how quickly you guys jump in the gutter when race is discussed, then are outraged when others choose not to discuss this issue.

"when they go low, we go high"
some forgotten politicians spouse 2016ish........



posted on Oct, 6 2017 @ 09:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: Gandalf77


i'd vote for michelle! i think she's great. she's hands down 100% better than what we got. lol




Maybe you'll get your chance. Contact your local DNC office and push the idea. I think Michelle is proud of America still.


If she ever loses an election, she won't be so proud.





Yeah, that's supposed to take the uppity right out of those darn females, ain't it Xuench.

Is that you Archie Bunker?
You are the only member using the word "uppity". Are you 75 or just trolling?


I'm just using the word so many of you want to use ... but can't bring yourselves to.

Especially you, Cleopatra.

lol
You don't even know what YOU want, let alone other members here.
Thank you for again highlighting what is wrong with you people.
You DO NOT always know what is best for OTHERS, and would be much better served looking out for your selves.
It never fails to amaze me how quickly you guys jump in the gutter when race is discussed, then are outraged when others choose not to discuss this issue.

"when they go low, we go high"
some forgotten politicians spouse 2016ish........


I don't think I asked you for mind-reading, oh Queen of Denial.

"You people" hoo boy.

I've never pretended to know what's best for others; I take excellent care of myself and my family.

It never ceases to amaze me how quickly you will wander off into vague, off-topic nonsense.

Michelle Obama, dude: FOCUS!



posted on Oct, 6 2017 @ 10:08 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Your quote in case you forgot.


I'm just using the word so many of you want to use ... but can't bring yourselves to.

Cause you know what "so many want"
Just like your hero, nothing but patheic.



posted on Oct, 6 2017 @ 10:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Gryphon66

Your quote in case you forgot.


I'm just using the word so many of you want to use ... but can't bring yourselves to.

Cause you know what "so many want"
Just like your hero, nothing but patheic.


Yes, because the word "uppity" means "self-important; arrogant."

Are you saying that's not how you would describe Michelle?

I have to say here, Shooter, you seem quite confused.



posted on Oct, 6 2017 @ 10:37 AM
link   

edit on 6-10-2017 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 6 2017 @ 10:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Gryphon66

Your quote in case you forgot.


I'm just using the word so many of you want to use ... but can't bring yourselves to.

Cause you know what "so many want"
Just like your hero, nothing but patheic.


Yes, because the word "uppity" means "self-important; arrogant."

Are you saying that's not how you would describe Michelle?

I have to say here, Shooter, you seem quite confused.

lol
That is just about all needed from you.
Define that however you like; I am old enough to understand how and why that word was used and what its usage implied.
You were the only member to use it.
When called on it you become less than genuine.
Par for the course for you people, and further reason to not engage you further.
www.theatlantic.com...
www.npr.org...
edit on 6/10/2017 by shooterbrody because: links for the disengenuous



posted on Oct, 6 2017 @ 11:22 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

I too am old enough to know what the word means and the context it was historically used in.

And it fits the constant Michelle Obama bashing to a T.

Anything else Cleo?



posted on Oct, 6 2017 @ 01:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: MysticPearl

originally posted by: amazing


So, back on point, Is Michelle wrong to call out that our government isn't very diverse?


She said "Because on one side, all men, all white,”.

So what's Ben Carson, I swear he ran for the GOP. Guess he's not black enough. Sarah Palin I don't care for, but I guess she's not a true woman as she's conservative. Herman Cain, also not a true black. Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice, Michael Steele, Ken Blackwell, Elroy Sailor, Ashley Bell, Lynne Patton and on and on and on.

But, all men, all white, because racist!


She didn't say it the right way, but really, the GOP is overwhelmingly white and doesn't do enough to court other demographics. You don't have to pander, but you should be working be a party for everyone. I think this election was an anomoly because nobody liked Hillary, and Trump came in as a firebrand outsider and really got people worked up and voting.

But take a closer look. I'll use one example. I think Sanders could have easily beaten any of the other Republican Candidates this time. They're stuck in the old mentality. It's affecting the Democrats as well. We need a couple of new parties or new life in some of the third parties.



posted on Oct, 6 2017 @ 03:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: amazing
But take a closer look. I'll use one example. I think Sanders could have easily beaten any of the other Republican Candidates this time. They're stuck in the old mentality. It's affecting the Democrats as well. We need a couple of new parties or new life in some of the third parties.


Maybe not by a landslide, but Sanders would have definitely won given the candidates we had to choose from. Things would have been more interesting if we went by popular vote, which I think is the fairest and would eliminate most of this political pointing and name calling that we have now. Heck, we could possibly see Michelle in office one day or even a new party. Aren't we still a government of the people, by the people, and for the people? Our vote needs to count, not persuade the electoral college.



posted on Oct, 6 2017 @ 03:45 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchenwow mike way to crap on your gender. if you wanted to be about diversity you would just come out and admit you are a homosexual male they you and barry could be the first homosexual couple. but really you to have proved to be pig headed racist do only difference between your husband and archie bunker was a more flowery speach pattern.




posted on Oct, 6 2017 @ 05:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Wow, another thread that will net flags and stars based only on the title.

I think it's funny that now you guys have a young, beautiful, brilliant Black Woman to be afraid of who has NONE of the baggage of Hillary Clinton.

I wonder if she's formed a PAC yet ... I'll have to go donate money just to help her keep evoking the hysteria.

LOL



A young, beautiful, brilliant black woman??? Wow! Who is it? You cant possibly mean the other Mr. obama....



posted on Oct, 6 2017 @ 06:35 PM
link   
Not surprised. She was the most hateful person to ever inhabit the white house. She truly despised white people and America and compared to others, she had no class whatsoever.



new topics

top topics



 
48
<< 13  14  15    17  18 >>

log in

join