It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: Teikiatsu
That isn't exactly true. Your comparing a budget with social services and workers insurance etc.
Your failing to recognize the ubi cancels welfare programs and pensions etc.
Everyone over 18 gets basic income. Not just unemployed. Do you have that?
Do you get a standard amount of cash every week or month not benefits. Cash.
Current federal social welfare programs in the United States are an expensive, complicated mess. According to Michael Tanner, the federal government spent more than $668 billion on over one hundred and twenty-six anti-poverty programs in 2012. When you add in the $284 billion spent by state and local governments, that amounts to $20,610 for every poor person in America.
Wouldn’t it be better just to write the poor a check?
Each one of those anti-poverty programs comes with its own bureaucracy and its own Byzantine set of rules. If you want to shrink the size and scope of government, eliminating those departments and replacing them with a program so simple it could virtually be administered by a computer seems like a good place to start. Eliminating bloated bureaucracies means more money in the hands of the poor and lower costs to the taxpayer. Win/Win.
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: hutch622
Well its pretty clear..
The dole is for people not working. It's rates differ for different people, it's made up of Healthcare etc...
The ubi is the same for everyone. It eliminates all benefits other than the basic income.