It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

my theory.. Vegas shooters motives were gun control .

page: 4
8
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 3 2017 @ 02:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: notsure1
So My theory about this guys motives is a little out there. I dont know all the facts or even how accurate what I do know is.

But from what I understand he had purchased most of these guns rather recently, and his brother seemed genuine saying he doesnt know why he had any guns.

So maybe he purchased and stockpiled them over some time planning an attack to show why we need to ban assault rifles.

Just a theory.


Its not a theory its a hypothesis with nothing to back it up.

Claiming that he committed this attacks to further some gun control agenda with out any evidence is just as valid as me saying he done it because Santa told him to.




posted on Oct, 3 2017 @ 03:52 AM
link   
a reply to: EmmanuelGoldstein


The reality is that with or without gun control, a madman will still find a way to do what he wants. Gun control just means lawbreakers have guns, and law abiding citizens are disarmed.



posted on Oct, 3 2017 @ 06:43 AM
link   
a reply to: muzzleflash

I believe political affiliation is irrelevant when someone goes on a killing spree. There's no proof the guy was Progressive and even if he was it shouldn't matter because the actions of one person should not define anyone else who possibly shares the same political party including the Planned Parenthood shooter.

Obviously the guy liked guns and liked using them, he wasn't against gun ownership, if he was he was the biggest hypocrite around.
edit on 10/3/2017 by 3NL1GHT3N3D1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 3 2017 @ 07:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Mandroid7


Does she have a point? Could this shooter have used a silencer? Would it have made it harder to find the shooter?



No...he couldn't have used one and it wouldn't have changed anything about finding him. A SUPPRESSOR only suppresses the sound. In a high velocity round that leaves the barrel at super sonic speeds it still creates a supersonic crack. The suppression is only there to keep the shooters ears from taking the trauma of the sound of gunpowder ignition.

On an automatic rifle, a SUPPRESSOR would have malfunctioned quickly and likely caused catastrophic failure, likely resulting in LESS deaths.

People, especially politicians, should really educate themselves on things they spew before they spew.



posted on Oct, 3 2017 @ 07:43 AM
link   
I think the Russians have done a good job training posters to mind manipulate..

What's going on here and a couple of other threads is the Hillary Pizza parlor mind game.

We didn't see an angry white man killing people because he can. You are suppose to see a progressive who did mass murder to score political points.

Yawn.



posted on Oct, 3 2017 @ 08:10 AM
link   
Stephen Paddock did attend left-wing anti-Trump rallies. Captured on video.



Also, his father was a convicted psychopath.



posted on Oct, 3 2017 @ 08:11 AM
link   
Satire:




posted on Oct, 3 2017 @ 08:19 AM
link   
a reply to: stormcell

That's convenient, video. That makes it the gospel truth.



posted on Oct, 3 2017 @ 08:21 PM
link   
Hasn't he been IDed at an anti-Trump rally?



posted on Oct, 4 2017 @ 09:23 AM
link   
The man did not fit a single profile out of 56 that the FBI uses for shooters like this. To me, this means mind control. Mind control and hijacking of motor functions, just like that discovered by the team at Buffalo University last month, and warned about by a cultural philosopher on Russian propaganda outlet RT the day before this attack. This same University paid Hillary Clinton to speak in 2014. The day after the attack, Hillary is spouting out gun control.


Imagine someone remotely controlling your brain, forcing your body’s central processing organ to send messages to your muscles that you didn’t authorize. It’s an incredibly scary thought, but scientists have managed to accomplish this science fiction nightmare for real, albeit on a much small scale, and they were even able to prompt their test subject to run, freeze in place, or even completely lose control over their limbs. Thankfully, the research will be used for good rather than evil… for now.

The effort, led by physics professor Arnd Pralle, PhD, of the University at Buffalo College of Arts and Sciences, focused on a technique called “magneto-thermal stimulation.” It’s not exactly a simple process — it requires the implantation of specially built DNA strands and nanoparticles which attach to specific neurons — but once the minimally invasive procedure is over, the brain can be remotely controlled via an alternating magnetic field. When those magnetic inputs are applied, the particles heat up, causing the neurons to fire.

The study, which was published in the most recent edition of the journal eLife, includes experiments where were performed on mice. Using the new technique, the researchers were able to control the movement of the animals, causing them to freeze, lock up their limbs, turn around, or even run.


I am loosely connecting Hillary admittedly due to the fact she has a trail of bodies following her family since the 80's all the way back to Arkansas and she was paid before by this University in unrelated matters in 2014. Plus she was the New York senator, so who knows what connections she made to this University of Buffalo Human brain hijacking study.

They were awarded $1.2 million to continue this study in 2012

Effort to Remotely Control Brain Cells Gets Push from Innovative Grant
Scientists developing a non-invasive technique for triggering brain activity receive $1.2 million from the Human Frontier Science Program .
The project is led by University at Buffalo Assistant Professor Arnd Pralle, PhD, a physicist who has pioneered a method of using tiny, magnetic particles to remotely induce neurons to fire.

Who is the Human Frontier Science Program??

The Human Frontier Science Program is a program of funding for frontier research in the life sciences. It is implemented by the International Human Frontier Science Program Organization (HFSPO) with its office in Strasbourg.
Members
The members of the HFSPO, the so-called Management Supporting Parties (MSPs) are the contributing countries and the European Union, which contributes on behalf of the non-G7 EU members.
The current MSPs are Australia, Canada, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Norway, New Zealand, Singapore, Switzerland the United Kingdom, the United States of America and the European Union.


Lets spread this information and help the general public bring it to the awareness of law enforcement and congress to investigate what role the innovations discovered at the University of Buffalo in New York may have played by through corruption and evil motives. The discovery they speak of has been demonstrated in a movie before, ten years ago!



posted on Oct, 4 2017 @ 09:36 AM
link   
a reply to: notsure1

So he's a David Gale, only a murderous one?

That would take...extreme dedication, but wouldn't make it less murderous or psychotic.



posted on Oct, 4 2017 @ 09:39 AM
link   
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1


He busted out the window in a high-rise hotel, ever smoked with the window open? The air flow sucks the smoke OUT, but apparently this time the airflow kept the smoke IN the room in order to set the fire alarm off so that the police could go in and find his already dead body.


Lighting/smoking one or two cigarettes is completely different than a high-powered rifle repeated firing over the span of 10 or so minutes. While airflow does suck out some smoke, there's still going to be a LOT of smoke...and heat.



posted on Oct, 9 2017 @ 08:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: notsure1


So maybe he purchased and stockpiled them over some time planning an attack to show why we need to ban assault rifles.

Just a theory.


But, all he really showed, is that we only needed to have banned him.

There are lots of guns out there that are not shooting at anybody.

If we could find and identify people like him, we'd have solved the problem without needing to ban guns.



new topics

top topics



 
8
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join