It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: Dragoon01
Just because they backed off doesn't mean they took their eyes off the door. Most of these casino security guys have form of training. Be it military, LE, or whatever. They're going to return fire as they withdraw down the hall. Especially if they have wounded. They're not just going to turn and run, giving the perp a chance to slip away.
originally posted by: 0x6372756d6273
originally posted by: antibren
We have one video from the 32nd after this time of someone peeping out so he didn’t off himself right after shooting the security.
Can you link me to this video please?
originally posted by: 0x6372756d6273
a reply to: Xcalibur254
The accomplice could have killed Paddock so authorities would think he was alone.
There is no evidence they "had eyes on the door". In fact, they clearly said they backed off because peaking down the hallway meant getting a bullet to the head.
Here is the basic layout of a Mandalay Bay floor:
The shooter(s) had control of the two rooms at the end of the hallway, rooms 32134 and 32135, roughly circled in red. With easy access to the stairs. The camera was placed in front of room 32134. A camera may have been looking at the stairwell doorway also.
The security guard and officers arrived via elevators in the green circle, and the guard was shot while walking down the hall towards the rooms. He was near the elevator.
www.usatoday.com...
“We have a security officer also shot in the leg on the 32nd floor,” someone from SWAT says. “He’s standing right by the elevator.”
“He shot down the hallway and hit a security guard,” says another.
They may have cleared the other hallways circled in purple. But they completely backed off away from the hallway with the room at the end. There is no evidence they kept an eye on the door. In fact, there is evidence they moved on to evacuate other floors while waiting for SWAT. There was a large window for someone to escape via stairs.
originally posted by: MysticPearl
I find the delay in any reporting of the motive to be suspicious.
originally posted by: Diabolical1972
According to his brother Steve was 61 when they became all rich. Steve was also an accountant for the private military intelligence group Lockheed Martin. His G/F CIA. Total hit. It explains why he didn't leave the room when he amble time to do so. Also why two rooms were rented.
originally posted by: Diabolical1972
a reply to: RomeByFire
In the thread that I am not going back through, someone posted that he worked for lockheed martin as an accountant.
originally posted by: RomeByFire
originally posted by: Diabolical1972
According to his brother Steve was 61 when they became all rich. Steve was also an accountant for the private military intelligence group Lockheed Martin. His G/F CIA. Total hit. It explains why he didn't leave the room when he amble time to do so. Also why two rooms were rented.
He never worked for Lockheed Martin.
Where are the sources regarding the gf being a CIA agent?
originally posted by: khnum
a reply to: RomeByFire
Try Virginia Military institute under the name Stephen Ham 1972 and yes you will of course debunk this as you've been doing to every suggestion for 100 pages