Whatever this person tries to claim and you all think. The objects itself in form and how they appear in combination with what I discovered in that
craft says to me that the people who labeled it as a fake wanted that to badly to become something that wouldn't be researched anymore.
So you and your henchmen may think what you want I've got my own conclusions
you're a goddamn liar and hoaxer, that's all there is to it.
the magnification you've provided has everything pixelated into oblivion, because you don't have a higher resolution source photo - yet the "mantis"
is sharp? it was obviously photoshopped, by you. it isn't there in the original photo, regardless if the original is a hoax or not.
so go ahead, provide us with the higher resolution source photo where that shape is clearly visible, or kindly take your trash elsewhere and stop
Do your own research not what others always say , don't be that sheep that follows the hurdle but Solomon that goes upstream..
I did not hoaxed the photographs or tampered with only then enlarge it and lighted it up a bit so that the truth behind the darkness got exposed . Any
man who can work with photoshop will come to my conclusion that I did nothing more then that..
It's not the phrase " I want to believe " anymore but, " I 'm afraid to believe "
edit on 0b44America/ChicagoSun, 01 Oct 2017 03:30:44
-0500vAmerica/ChicagoSun, 01 Oct 2017 03:30:44 -05001 by 0bserver1 because: (no reason given)
That's a good idea Phage , it's pointless if two men have the opposite believes and want to battle where wars start and people starting to die. It's
better to walk away from the battlefield and nobody dies.
And it's Sunday and got to go to church i'm still a man that believes in God and church
Although I do respect your opinions sometimes, not always i'm afraid..
Until next time
edit on 0b53America/ChicagoSun, 01 Oct 2017 03:41:53 -0500vAmerica/ChicagoSun, 01 Oct 2017 03:41:53 -05001 by 0bserver1
because: (no reason given)
I'm leaving this thread for now until I'm ready and prepared for part two .
I still dare those who are good with photoshop to review the particular picture I brought here as evidence .
Do the Google search for submarine ufo take out the highest resolution and look for what I looked for you'll see that every enlargement of the area I
point out will atleast show one being in the right corner .
i could swear ive seen this same image pop up before and its only a blimp being used as a target by the navy. i think there was a sequence of photos
showing it as they shelled it and destroyed enough inner bladders to make it fall out of the sky. WW1 if i remember right.
edit on 1-10-2017
by TheScale because: (no reason given)
edit on 1-10-2017 by TheScale because: (no reason given)
Today some seem to prefer blimps over weather balloons. If one would look closer they would see that some of these craft are huge and triangular in
form as the one I pointed out as the same ufo seen at sea from Turkish people..
Mantis or mantoid's are as you know a common feature of many abduction story's, whether they are real of not those whom have those encounters certain
seem to believe they are, the SMALL grey's are supposed to be subservient to them with the Tall Grey's having an unknown relationship, however many
account's even suggest that the Mantoid's are also superiors to the Nordic type humanoid alien's.
They were most popularized in the public imagination by Whitely Strieber's novel Communion, a novel which actually gave me the Heebe Jeebe's because
though description differed much that he wrote was awfully familiar to me.
Also despite my earlier Cheech and Chong suggestion (And that clip really does remind me of it) this is a great image, CGI or not, if it was not CGI
than I would argue this is NOT a blimp, Blimp's have fin's and of course Engine's, tethered blimp's have a cable which if one was ever built to reach
that altitude would be clearly visible because it would have to be rather thick and strong.
But as Phage correctly point's out the site it come's from is a YouTube channel that has a large following and plenty of highly suspect material, not
all of it is actually suspect but the site may not be above some less credible imagery.
That reminds me of the travesty about the supposed and fake Apollo 20 mission and the cigar on the moon, there really is an anomalous feature there
that may be a real structure of some kind or could just be a lunar anomaly of geology but as the community were getting more interested in that
phenomena that video came out as if to discredit the whole subject.
I do not think Observer the OP should leave his thread, any disagreement's should be kept low key and a civil discussion on all party's should take
place, sometimes opinion's will remain divided that is just the way it is and will always be and we should respect one another's views on occasion's
So every one should just cool it, take a step back if need be, learn from our own errors and try not to be so big headed when we are right that we
can not get it back out of the door because we are all some times wrong and all some times right.
edit on 1-10-2017 by LABTECH767 because: (no reason given)
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.