State Department releases thousands of Hillary Clinton documents

Without much fanfare, the State Department has released over 6,000 documents related to Hillary Clinton's time as Secretary of State, prompting speculation that it might contain explosive revelations.

Source



There was no official announcement of the data dump and people are already speculating that this means bad news for Hillary. We shouldn't assume that any damaging information will be found, but there’s always a chance. Have fun going through it at your leisure.

The State Department’s Reading Room website contains 301 pages, with 20 entries each, of emails released under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) rulings.

It's not hard to find, the endless articles about how active the State Dept. was in blocking FOIA requests especially during her tenure. This censorship was rampant across Obama's government, especially in Hillary's State Dept. Sounds like quite a bit of those things people had been itching and scratching for all vomited out at once...

originally posted by: eisegesis

God help us. Thank you God for helping us.

a reply to: eisegesis

Since there was no official announcement of the data dump, conservative pundits that noticed it quickly began speculating that the cache contained compromising information about Clinton’s tenure at the State Department, during which she used a private email server located at one of her residences.

Always on a Friday night it seems.

a reply to: JinMI

The irony of RT breaking the news to the masses is priceless.

Schedules ... wow!

Any grocery lists?

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
It's not hard to find, the endless articles about how active the State Dept. was in blocking FOIA requests especially during her tenure. This censorship was rampant across Obama's government, especially in Hillary's State Dept. Sounds like quite a bit of those things people had been itching and scratching for all vomited out at once...

No way. President Obama won an official Transparency in Government Award

a reply to: eisegesis


Since this occurred at 4:28pm today, and Fox News has said NUTHHHINGG in the 9 hours since, it's must be a "nice" dump. I think James Comey said that there were over 50,000 e-mails?

originally posted by: Phage
Schedules ... wow!

Any grocery lists?

You read them all?
Wow.

9082 pages thats gonna take a while to look through.......are there normally this many when this kind of thing happens

It doesn't take long to find things that are a bit odd (if not illegal) - in 2009 there is an email where Hillary asks her team to follow up on a Clinton Global Initiative approach to set up a meeting with the President and find out what could be offered. I thought she promised not include her business interests when she took the SOS job.



I believe the person reaching out to see "what he could offer" was David Crane of NRG Energy.

page one seems to be just lists and comunications one about dressing for snowy weather.

page two covers judicial watch v state department and energy insitute v state department and then jeffery stine v Cia

page 3 immigration reform v state and american society for law and justice v state department no.16

page 4 ameican center of law and justice v state department 16

page 5 same as page 4

page 6 national security archives and one on citizens united

pages 7-17 same all on citizens united

paged 18 citizens united and somethng about federation for immigration reform vs uscis and that continues from this page tell page 21 when it goes back to citizens united

page 22-36 its back to citizens united and then ones with blank headders

36-48 all blank headders then back to judical watch v state department from 48-176 same all judical watch stuff

177 covers jacqulen stevenes v department of state and goes on tell bottom of 183 ,i need to sleep but this is what i got from skimming so far

from the last page of documents under subhedder q and a about secret cia prisons in europe copied from PDF

L Press Guidance December 14, 2005 Council of Europe's Inquiry into Secret Prisons / Rendition Flights Question: Does the State Department have any comment on the Council of Europe's Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights report on their inquiry into allegations concerning secret prisons and rendition flights? Answer: • We have seen the report that Dick Marty delivered Tuesday [at the meeting of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe's Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights, which Mr. Marty chairs]. • The Secretary spoke to these issues at length in her statement and in subsequent public remarks last week; we provided a copy of those remarks to Mr. Marty on December 7. • We are not in a position to comment further at this time.

and

Background: Dick Marty reported yesterday on his inquiry into the alleged secret detention centers and rendition flights in COE member states. Among other things, Marty reported that information he has gathered to date reinforces the credibility of allegations concerning the transfer and temporary detention of individuals, without any judicial involvement, in European countries. He noted too that the allegations have never been formally denied by the United States. Specifically, Marty deplored the fact that no information or explanations had been provided on this point by Secretary Rice during her visit to Europe. Marty also said that his Committee has sent letters requesting information to Poland and Romania, and to the Permanent Observer of the United States to the Council of Europe, as well as to the Director General of Eurocontrol and the Director of the European Union Satellite Centre (EUSC). The Committee has called on the Council of the EU to intercede with EUSC to get authorization for access to the relevant data. Marty also welcomed the opening by Council of Europe of an Article 52 (of the European Convention on Human Rights) investigation permitting requests for relevant information from the parties to that Convention. Marty urged all COE member governments to commit themselves fully to establishing the truth about alleged rendition flights over their territories in recent years. He said he intends to ask the leaders of the parliamentary delegations to the Assembly to take initiatives within their parliaments in order to obtain more precise information, either by putting questions to their governments or by setting up of committees of inquiry. Marty said that the seriousness of the allegations and the consistency of the information gathered to date justify an in-depth inquiry. Marty's statement said that, if the allegations proved correct, the member states concerned would stand accused of having seriously breached their human rights obligations to the Council of Europe. He announced that the Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights will ask the Bureau of the Assembly to include in the order of business of the next PACE's plenary session (January 23-27 2006) an urgent debate on the subject.

page 3 wouldnt load not sure what im even reading honestly

put Benghazi in the search the site lets you use there are 157 pages on the matter

a reply to: eisegesis

Who cares! She's done and gone... Move on with your life! Why dwell? Stupid waste of discussion

originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: eisegesis

Who cares! She's done and gone... Move on with your life! Why dwell? Stupid waste of discussion

So you're saying statute of limitations has ended? Or do you mean any criminal wrong doing by her is ok because she's no longer a public official?

originally posted by: Rosinitiate

originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: eisegesis

Who cares! She's done and gone... Move on with your life! Why dwell? Stupid waste of discussion

So you're saying statute of limitations has ended? Or do you mean any criminal wrong doing by her is ok because she's no longer a public official?

So sick of this attitude. Yeah, she lost. That does not mean criminal actions, abuses of power, and her office are to be freaking ignored.

Well I know a few of these "new" ones will help expose even more about ol' Hillary and how she operated.

She will need to answer for this again and again as she continues her campaigning onslaught.